QUOTE(darun @ Oct 12 2006, 11:23 AM)
Actually, this kind of practice is always good for the company and the boss/manager, but whether it is good for the employee is kinda depends on the individual. If there is knowledge sharing, then the company will benefit as it means its employees will be able to contribute better, on top of that once the knowledge level is saturated, i.e. leveled out where most the employees are at the same level, then this will drive competition and again the company will benefit.
On the other hand, from an employees point of view, each person has their own skill and knowledge that gives them the competitive edge. Like you said, teaching others this is practically limiting your own rice bowl.
What do you say if currently it's only me who's teaching and others never teach? This benefits the company but not me or other workers.
QUOTE(dreamer101 @ Oct 12 2006, 11:27 AM)
Carefree,
1) If you think you live on what you know at this moment forever, you must be very naive. If you can learn it in 6 months, someone else can definitely learn it in 6 months too. So, you need to keep on running and learn more stuff.
2) Why do you think you cannot learn from others too??
3) By the way, you learn and know more when you teach someone. If and only if you can teach someone, that is when you really know something. Only when you teach someone, you know whether you have a gap in your knowledge.
4) I had worked in IT/Datacom/telcom world for 20 years and I still need to learn and keep up with the world. What makes you think that your 6 months of learning can last you a while??
5) In this new world, the most important thing is not what you know. Anyone can Google and know a lot of stuff. The most important thing is how fast that you can learn anything..
Dreamer
P.S.: My company used to have what we called brown bag lunch. That means at lunch time, people bring their own lunch to listen to lectures/training from their co-workers. The attendance and presentation are purely voluntary. You could choose to present or attend as you wish. It is lunch hour which is not part of working hour. The presentation material are stored on the server for anyone to learn at any time. This is American company at USA.
By the way, the free seminar / presentation are highly common and open to public for almost all universities at USA. And, some of them are probably webcast over the internet. A lot of MIT lectures videos are stored and available over the Internet too.
So, do you really think what you know is really worth that much??
Dreamer,
1) 6 months is short, I know. But as I said, you must understand the consept, else, you can't learn it well. Of course I do improve, that's why I'm now taking part time degree study. I don't wanna stuck with what I know now.
2) I do want to learn from others but if others in the learning session do not wish to teach (which they are now), how do you think I could learn?
3) No comment on this point. But I do agree.
4) Same as point (1). On top of that, I do always search for better ways to improve my working speed/quality.
5) Understand, will keep this in mind.
From what you've said, it's good for having a learning session but best is it's on voluntary. What's the point if it's only me who teaches what I know and others do not teach what they know? This is the main reason, and if they can google and learn what I know all this two years of learning, I must

them.