Photography The Official Nikon Discussion Thread Ver.25, D500 out now
|
|
 May 25 2015, 10:08 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Mar 2011 From: 57000 Sri Petaling  
|
Is it worth to get a nikon 35mm f/2.0D lens with damaged exterior (lots of scratches) at less than rm600? The seller claims that it still work properly. Average price at LYN used is around rm900
|
|
|
May 25 2015, 10:46 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Mar 2011 From: 57000 Sri Petaling
|
QUOTE(PF T.J. @ May 25 2015, 10:30 AM) I think its worth it, but you have to be very sure that the damage is only limited to the external parts Quote from seller:  "The lens is clean. There are tiny dusts inside the lens. But it doesn't affect pictures. And of course it has no fungus,no haze,no scratch,no balsam separation."   |
|
|
May 25 2015, 02:31 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Mar 2011 From: 57000 Sri Petaling
|
QUOTE(Everdying @ May 25 2015, 12:56 PM) damaged exterior can mean its been dropped? so just make sure it focuses well else lens may be out of alignment, so only one way to find out. A D90.but what body are u using it on? if DX then the 35mm 1.8 is better and cheaper. I've been looking around for comparison with the 1.8 DX. There are features where the AF-D wins, but yeah overall 1.8 DX is better. Still I'd go for AF-D with a good price. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0581sec
 0.40
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 10:28 PM |
Quote