ayam actually more happy with this news. hoping they could purchase enough as 1-1 replacement for older ships like Sipadan. bigger ships like gagah samudera are also needed for OPV role

as for nsm, i dun give a fark. I personally prefers MM40mkIII but if rmn thinks nsm is superior, then why not. at least them older MM40mkII can be used to equip our SGPV and kasturi class instead

we have 56 astross 2, up to 100 oto melaras,22 G-5 and ant a dozen FH 70. so we do have pretty potent arty capability. we do however need to increase our 155mm arty number(there's like,what? 3 battalion worth?). them korean KH 179 155mm towed arty should be good. cheaper than G-5, as well as getting more 120mm mortar to complement oto melara. then we tok abt SPH

This post has been edited by ayanami_tard: Apr 13 2015, 10:08 PM

dalam perkara yg x berkaitan, russia already sell s-400 to prc.

since when we have 54 astross?

so what up with all the aster 30 vls lah, RAM CIW lah, et cetera?

when in doubt, buy another 18

I don't think the army will satisfied until we have at least 5 regiments (1 regiment: 18 launcher) of them astross II, 2 stationed in east malaysia while 3 stationed in peninsula.

at this rate i think the hueland will even throw blueprint on how to make munitions for our launchers for free. we're one of biggest astross user after all

still, sph juga tidak dilupa



This post has been edited by ayanami_tard: Apr 20 2015, 09:13 PM

mp.net is gonna close soon(may 1)

damn i gonna miss that place

for one thing, i aint gonna register as ayanamitard again

big boss retire liao

damn thing is going through under SGPV programme

offsets is good because none of our hard money go out, also we can sell our commodity and open up business potential, not to mention helping other industries. thailand paid part of them gripen with thai food while myanmar paid part of them china made stuff( sph, k-8 trainer and some missiles) with copper. cambodia bought some stuff from thailand and they paid partly with scrap metals from UXOs(unexploded ordnance)

some countries accept offsets because thats exactly what they need(palm oil, rubber, metals,etc). some countries accept offsets to make themselves more attractive to buyers.

the only country that afaik dun accept offset deal is US of A

sokong-lah produk negara islam

So far the only plausible option is T-90

T-84 is mechanically different(also also more complicated) than T-72. The fact that russia is mothballing their T-80 in favor of modernizing more T-72B into T-90 standard speak volume.

If we wanna go for both volume and also keeping the cost down, Type 96 is indeed a good idea. It weigh less than 50 tonne, use L/44 clone gun(only that it's 125mm to simplify logistics), can fire ATGM and powered by 1000hp powertrain. battleproven summore.

hell maybe they even give us Type 90 blueprint for free

t-72?what t-72? t-54 ada lar

all china tanks are based from T-54/type 59. only the newest type 99 have totally new design

if u follow chinese tank development, almost all chinese tank trave their root from type59/t-54.

just read this over mp.net mk II

http://indianexpress.com/article/india/ind...o-take-off-cag/

basically india will have to fight with stick and stone after 10 days.

This aspect of military is what fascinates me the mosf, the logistics. sure i oso like seeing new tanks and chopper being bought but if you cannot properly into logistics, they are just there being showpiece and all

best korean ballistic missiles are liquid fueled, so usa and worst korea can anticipate and intercept them missile(via SM-2 missile in their aegis network)

worst Korea have also developed their own long rang cruise missile

for shit and giggles. i bet idiot who made the "may may" haven't even see a tank up close