Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
121 Pages « < 45 46 47 48 49 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Military Thread V16

views
     
BorneoAlliance
post Apr 4 2015, 09:47 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2014
user posted image
BorneoAlliance
post Apr 4 2015, 09:53 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2014
user posted image
BorneoAlliance
post Apr 4 2015, 10:16 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2014
user posted image

This post has been edited by BorneoAlliance: Apr 4 2015, 10:23 PM
BorneoAlliance
post Apr 5 2015, 11:38 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2014

AG-600 likely a military transport plane for Chinese troops in Pacific


user posted image

AG-600 amphibious flying boat, the largest seaplane in the world, designed by the Aviation Industry Corporation of China, can potentially be used as for military transport across the Pacific, according to Vasily Kashin an analyst from Moscow's Center for Analysis of Strategies and Technologies, according to Sputnik News.

The AG-600, set to take its first flight next year, is being developed primarily to extinguish forest fires and carry out maritime humanitarian operations according to the Aviation Industry Corporation of China. However, Kashin said it is extremely unlike China to devote so much resources and money to design an aircraft purely for firefighting purposes. Kashin said that the AG-600 will likely be unfit for purpose as a search and rescue plane at sea, as it will not stand up to ocean waves.

Kashin said it is also unsuited to long-range maritime patrol missions because most land-based aircraft with enough range can do the job better and more efficiently. With its large size, the AG-600 is more likely to be used as long-range transport to transfer cargo and personnel across the vast Pacific region. The People's Liberation Army Navy or Air Force may use it to project Chinese power and influence to the disputed South China Sea and any other region in the Western Pacific.

http://www.wantchinatimes.com/news-subclas...000022&cid=1101
IReallyNeed Answers
post Apr 5 2015, 11:50 AM

Krazeybender
*****
Senior Member
921 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
From: Cheras


QUOTE(BorneoAlliance @ Apr 4 2015, 10:16 PM)
user posted image
*
Lol, why is peenoise on the list but sg and my not on list?

Peenoise just waste space only when include them in!

Hahahaha
BorneoAlliance
post Apr 5 2015, 02:12 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2014

The Pentagon’s $10-billion bet gone bad

user posted image

QUOTE
It was the most powerful radar of its kind in the world, they told Congress. So powerful it could detect a baseball over San Francisco from the other side of the country.

If North Korea launched a sneak attack, the Sea-Based X-Band Radar — SBX for short — would spot the incoming missiles, track them through space and guide U.S. rocket-interceptors to destroy them. 

Crucially, the system would be able to distinguish between actual missiles and decoys.  SBX “represents a capability that is unmatched,” the director of the Missile Defense Agency told a Senate subcommittee in 2007.


QUOTE
In reality, the giant floating radar has been a $2.2-billion flop, a Los Angeles Times investigation found.


http://graphics.latimes.com/missile-defense/
BorneoAlliance
post Apr 5 2015, 07:20 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2014

China’s Coming War With Asia: trouble brews in neighbourhood

user posted image

QUOTE
‘‘China claims that its rise is intended to be peaceful,’’ defence analyst Andrew Krepinevich writes in the current issue of Foreign Affairs, ‘‘but its actions tell a different story: that of a revisionist power seeking to dominate the western Pacific.’’ 

Krepinevich argues forthrightly that the response of the US and other regional states should be ‘‘archipelagic defence’’, by which he means hi-tech defence of the first island chain — Japan, the Ryukyus, Taiwan and The Philippines — against Chinese revisionist claims and military intrusion. Quite certainly, this is the fault-line where the tectonic plates of American supremacy and Chinese ambition meet.


http://www.theaustralian.com.au/arts/revie...h-1227290211398
BorneoAlliance
post Apr 5 2015, 07:28 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2014
user posted image
BorneoAlliance
post Apr 5 2015, 07:37 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2014
user posted image
BorneoAlliance
post Apr 5 2015, 09:58 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2014
RMAF MADGE SOC 3

user posted image

This post has been edited by BorneoAlliance: Apr 5 2015, 10:06 PM
SUSfutmil
post Apr 5 2015, 10:22 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
1 posts

Joined: Dec 2010
user posted image
LTZ
post Apr 5 2015, 10:30 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
36 posts

Joined: Sep 2013
QUOTE(BorneoAlliance @ Apr 5 2015, 09:58 PM)
RMAF MADGE SOC 3

user posted image
*
Masih x de early warning....

Borneo dilupakan....
BorneoAlliance
post Apr 5 2015, 11:08 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2014
QUOTE(LTZ @ Apr 5 2015, 10:30 PM)
Masih x de early warning....

Borneo dilupakan....
*
Untuk Borneo Mo Aegis tuan baru dapat defend dari .... tongue.gif
wkkm007
post Apr 6 2015, 12:05 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,123 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
From: OUG - Muhibbah LRT



atreyuangel
post Apr 6 2015, 01:38 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
406 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E



QUOTE(LTZ @ Apr 5 2015, 10:30 PM)
Masih x de early warning....

Borneo dilupakan....
*
OTW tuu
skali gap filler sama coastal baruu...


opss tongue.gif tongue.gif
BorneoAlliance
post Apr 6 2015, 07:55 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2014
user posted image
BorneoAlliance
post Apr 6 2015, 07:58 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2014
user posted image
waja2000
post Apr 6 2015, 10:51 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
QUOTE(azriel @ Apr 3 2015, 09:45 AM)
Looks like it will not be a flat-top design.
According to Marhalim's article it is a smaller variant of the Type 071. IMO the design looks similar to the Makassar Class.
*
well just want to ask,
LPD vs Frigate with one is more complex ?
biggrin.gif

azriel
post Apr 6 2015, 11:43 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
4 posts

Joined: Jan 2012
QUOTE(waja2000 @ Apr 6 2015, 10:51 AM)
well just want to ask,
LPD vs Frigate with one is more complex ? 
biggrin.gif
*
Well i'm no expert but IMO building a LPD is more complex as it need to do this:

user posted image

BorneoAlliance
post Apr 6 2015, 03:47 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2014
user posted image

121 Pages « < 45 46 47 48 49 > » 
Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0285sec    0.44    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 9th December 2025 - 09:38 AM