Military Thread V16
Military Thread V16
|
|
Mar 19 2015, 04:22 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
726 posts Joined: Nov 2014 From: Southern Uganda |
Nobody want to run nekid ke? i'll do in mah bathroom if the sam be change and ciws be added
|
|
|
Mar 19 2015, 04:36 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Dec 2014 |
Norway Arctic exercise 'a provocation': Russia ![]() Russia has criticised Norway’s ongoing military exercise on the two countries’ northern borders as a deliberate provocation used as a cover for gathering intelligence about its Arctic neighbour. Between March 9 and March 18, Norway’s Armed Forces are carrying out their "Joint Viking" exercise, involving 5,000 troops in Finnmark county. In response, Russia on Monday ordered 45,000 Russian troops as well as war planes and submarines to begin exercises, in a huge show of military force. Aleksandr Khrolenko, a Putin loyalist who has held senior positions in Chechnya and South Ossetia, argued that Nato, through Norway, had deliberately provoked Russia, writing in Ria Novosti, Russia’s state newswire. “Given the growing tensions between Russia and Nato, the choice of training area looks like a provocation,” Khrolenko wrote. By bringing the Norwegian frigate Thor Heyerdahl to Kirkenes, a Norwegian town on Russia’s border, Norway was mounting “a threat to Russia’ Northern Fleet”, he argued. The Norwegian made Naval Strike Missile (NSM) has a range of 185km, whereas Severomorsk, the main base for Russia’s northern fleet is just 150km away. The Nato exercises, he argued, “violates longstanding principles of good neighbourliness in the Arctic”. Norway had not invited Russian military observers to the exercise, he added, ending decades of common practice. He also claimed that Nato was using its Arctic exercises to learn how to mount intelligence operations against Russia in the north, and also to increase “military pressure” on the Russian Arctic. http://www.thelocal.no/20150318/norway-arc...vocation-russia |
|
|
Mar 19 2015, 04:36 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,210 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
|
|
|
Mar 19 2015, 04:41 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
726 posts Joined: Nov 2014 From: Southern Uganda |
|
|
|
Mar 19 2015, 04:45 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Dec 2014 |
US Army approves Israeli surveillance balloon for purchase ![]() QUOTE The US Army has named a surveillance aerostat made by Israeli defense firm RT as an approved defense technology for purchase, the company announced on Wednesday. RT’s Skystar 180 balloon successfully completed the annual Army Expeditionary Warrior Experiment (AEWE), a lengthy process used to shortlist defense products for US acquisition. The Skystar 180 system, frequently used by the IDF over Gaza during Operation Protective Edge last summer, includes a miniature, multi-sensor payload made by Israeli company CONTROP. It serves army missions from the company to the brigade levels, according to RT. The AEWE program, held at Fort Benning, Georgia, is used by the US Army to encourage companies from around the world to submit production-ready devices and products for approval. “The selection and approval of the SkyStar 180 by the US Army is evidence of the system’s quality and its high-level technological capabilities, and it is a great honor for us,” said RT’s CEO, Rami Shmueli. “Our unique aerostat systems are the only long-distance aerial surveillance system that can operate from as high as 600 meters.” SkyStar 180 is a small mobile balloon designed for tactical mid-range surveillance and public safety, police, and military applications. It can carry day and night electro-optical payloads and a communication relay, suspended from a helium-filled balloon that is tethered to the ground. http://www.jpost.com/Israel-News/US-Army-a...purchase-394405 |
|
|
Mar 19 2015, 04:46 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,210 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
QUOTE(Dreadstar @ Mar 19 2015, 04:35 PM) now waiting for torpedo news... J+S launcher compatible with any Nato lightweight torpedoes and US Mk 44 / Mk 46 torpedoes. MU90.. what are odds?even RMN never hint what torpedo they wish If not that, most likely british stingray QUOTE(OvenBaked @ Mar 19 2015, 04:41 PM) Not compatible with vls systemSylver vls.. i just want so which version will rmn install. If they think of future. A50. Then can install aster system with upgraded radar |
|
|
Mar 19 2015, 04:47 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(Dreadstar @ Mar 19 2015, 04:35 PM) now waiting for torpedo news... J+S launcher compatible with any Nato lightweight torpedoes and US Mk 44 / Mk 46 torpedoes. basically MU90 i think, can use it in both Helicopter and ship. even RMN never hint what torpedo they wish so no need buy 2 type torpedo. This post has been edited by waja2000: Mar 19 2015, 04:49 PM |
|
|
Mar 19 2015, 05:06 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
726 posts Joined: Nov 2014 From: Southern Uganda |
![]() |
|
|
Mar 19 2015, 05:08 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
25 posts Joined: Jul 2008 |
Nice NSM.
|
|
|
Mar 19 2015, 05:11 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
|
|
|
Mar 19 2015, 05:22 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
726 posts Joined: Nov 2014 From: Southern Uganda |
QUOTE ![]() The state-of-the-art design and use of composite materials is meant to give the missile sophisticated stealth capabilities. The missile will weigh slightly more than 400 kg (880 lb) and have a range of at least 185 km (100 nm). NSM is designed for littoral waters ("brown water") as well as for open sea ("green and blue water") scenarios. The usage of a high strength titanium alloy blast/fragmentation warhead from TDW is in line with the modern lightweight design and features insensitive high-explosive II. Warhead initiation is by a void-sensing Programmable Intelligent Multi-Purpose Fuze designed to optimise effect against hard targets. Like its Penguin predecessor, NSM is able to fly over and around landmasses, travel in sea skim mode, and then make random manoeuvres in the terminal phase, making it harder to stop by enemy countermeasures. While the Penguin is a yaw-to-turn missile, NSM is based on bank-to-turn flight (see Yaw (flight) and flight control). The target selection technology provides NSM with a capacity for independent detection, recognition, and discrimination of targets at sea or on the coast. This is possible by the combination of an imaging infrared (IIR) seeker and an onboard target database. NSM is able to navigate by GPS, inertial and terrain reference systems. After being launched into the air by a solid rocket booster which is jettisoned upon burning out, the missile is propelled to its target in high subsonic speed by a turbojet sustainer engine—leaving the 125 kg multi-purpose blast/fragmentation warhead to do its work, which in case of a ship target means impacting the ship at or near the water line. |
|
|
Mar 19 2015, 05:52 PM
|
|
Elite
1,157 posts Joined: Jul 2008 From: Petaling Jaya |
Hmm, lots of interesting news.
thales for the supply of optronic and communication equipment for the mkm worth rm50mil. Putd is expected to operate 15 nuri while tudm will operate 12. petronas sign mou on s-100 uav. |
|
|
Mar 19 2015, 06:01 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Dec 2014 |
Russia, China may coordinate on nuclear-powered destroyer ![]() Russia is very likely to start construction on the world's third nuclear-powered destroyer with the assistance of China. Admiral Igor Kasatonov, retired deputy commander of the Russian Navy, said the construction of the 10,000-ton Leader-class guided-missile destroyer would begin in 2017. Vasily Kashin, a military expert from the Center for Analysis of Strategies and Technologies based in Moscow, said the project provides a new opportunity for China and Russia to deepen defense cooperation. The Leader-class destroyer would be the world's third nuclear-powered destroyer after the USS Truxtun (DLGN-35) and USS Bainbridge (DLGN-25) of the United States. Since both American vessels were later redesignated cruisers, the Leader-class would in fact be the only nuclear-powered destroyer in the world. Kashin said that the Leader-class is larger than the two American ships. Unlike the US Navy, Russia does not have overseas naval bases around the world, the piece said, and it makes sense for Russia and China to build nuclear-powered destroyers or cruisers that can remain at sea for longer. Kashin also said China is working hard on the design of a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier. The participation of China in the construction of the Leader-class destroyer may give China the experience it needs, he said. http://www.wantchinatimes.com/news-subclas...000149&cid=1101 |
|
|
Mar 19 2015, 06:06 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Dec 2014 |
Iraqi Air Force got CH-4B drone from China: Moscow think tank ![]() QUOTE The photograph of the drone suspected to be the CH-4B at an Iraqi Air Force base currently making the rounds on social media. (Internet photo) A photograph has surfaced online which purportedly shows a CH-4B unmanned combat aerial vehicle stationed at an Iraqi Air Force base, according to a March 17 report by Moscow-based think tank Center for Analysis of Strategies and Technologies cited by China's Global Times. This is the first known instance of the drone, developed by Beijing-based China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation (CASC), being exported, according to the paper. The CH-4 series of drones, the design for which was heavily copied from the US MQ-1 Reaper developed by General Atomics, entered service with the PLA Air Force in 2013. The CH-4 has a wingspan of 18 m and a maximum takeoff weight of 1350 kilograms. Two variants of the drone have emerged, the CH-4A surveillance drone and the combination surveillance and attack CH-4B. The CH-4A can fly for a maximum of 30 hours or 5,000 km, although another estimate put it as high as 40 hours. It can cruise at altitudes of between 5,000-7,000 m at a speed of 150-180 km per hour. The drone can fly within a 250 km radius of its operator, but with a satellite link this can be increased to 2,000 km. The CH-4B can carry six weapons weighing up to a maximum of 250-350 kg, according to different estimates, and it is equipped to carry CASC's 45 kg AR-1 laser-guided anti-tank missile, which can be fired from an altitude of 5,000 m, and several small satellite-guided aerial bombs, weighing 100 kg. With a full weapons payload it can fly for a maximum of 14 hours. http://www.wantchinatimes.com/news-subclas...000159&cid=1101 |
|
|
Mar 19 2015, 06:06 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Sep 2009 From: under the moonlight |
QUOTE(KYPMbangi @ Mar 19 2015, 03:55 PM) ayam actually more happy with this news. hoping they could purchase enough as 1-1 replacement for older ships like Sipadan. bigger ships like gagah samudera are also needed for OPV roleas for nsm, i dun give a fark. I personally prefers MM40mkIII but if rmn thinks nsm is superior, then why not. at least them older MM40mkII can be used to equip our SGPV and kasturi class instead |
|
|
Mar 19 2015, 06:18 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Dec 2014 |
DARPA moves ahead on long-range 100 Gbps wireless links ![]() Pentagon researchers are taking the next step in developing an airborne wireless link that can transmit data at 100 gigabits per second over long distances. The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency has issued a Broad Agency Announcement for Phases 2 and 3 of the project, which could issue up to two awards totaling $27 million. The goal is to hit 100 Gbps across 100 kilometers (62 miles) for an air-to-ground link and 200 kilometers (124 miles) for an air-to-air link, each within a single radio-frequency channel. Six contractors—Northrop Grumman, Raytheon, Battelle Memorial Institute, Silvus Technologies, Trex Enterprises and Applied Communication Sciences— took part in Phase 1 of the program, which explored high-order modulation at millimeter-wave frequencies and spatial multiplexing as the foundations for achieving 100 Gbps. Phase 1 technologies achieved rates in excess of 25 Gbps on a single carrier and 50 Gbps with dual polarization, DARPA said, showing the potential for 100 Gbps. How fast is 100 Gbps? In October 2013, German researchers managed that speed, which was at the time declared to be a world record for wireless transmission, 10 times faster than Google Fiber. But that was in a lab, using lasers combined with electronics. So getting to 100 Gbps in the air over long distances would be quite a feat. Basically, DARPA wants to provide forces in the field with the kind of connectivity they would get from a fiber optic network, but do it wirelessly. That 100 Gbps speed would be about 500 times faster than the military’s current wireless connections. In the next phases of DARPA’s program, researchers will seek to develop a prototype airborne data link capable of being installed in a high-altitude aerial platform, operating at up to 60,000 feet, and functioning in all weather conditions, regardless of rain, fog or clouds. The system will include both airborne and ground nodes, with the airborne node’s size, weight and power requirements being compatible with high-altitude unmanned aircraft, DARPA said. http://defensesystems.com/articles/2015/03...reless.aspx?m=2 |
|
|
Mar 19 2015, 06:32 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Dec 2014 |
Russia Targets NATO With Military Exercises
![]() Analysis QUOTE According to Russian statements, the snap exercise, which was not announced before it began March 16, will last five days and will involve some 45,000 servicemen, around 3,000 vehicles, more than 40 surface vessels, 15 submarines and 110 aircraft. The more notable systems involved are the Iskander mobile theater ballistic missiles and fighter aircraft that are being deployed to Kaliningrad, Tu-22M3 long-range strategic bombers that are being deployed to Crimea, and ballistic missile submarines that have been sent to sea with protective escorts. QUOTE The forward deployment of theater ballistic missiles and bomber aircraft are provocative indicators of possible pre-emptive action against NATO and Eastern Europe. Given Russia's military actions in Ukraine, the possibility, however unlikely, that the country could expand operations cannot be dismissed. For that reason, and because Russia has intentionally designed the drills to mimic a potential conflict with Europe, the exercises are cause for alarm in Europe. By deploying Tu-22M3 bomber aircraft, Russia is also openly invoking the threat of nuclear confrontation. Considering Moscow's statements about a potential deployment of nuclear weapons to Crimea, Russia is clearly connecting the Ukraine crisis and its intentions in the Arctic to the nuclear deterrent it possesses. QUOTE Considering the military tensions surrounding the Ukraine crisis and its fragile cease-fire, these exercises are an aggressive signal, particularly since they immediately follow Putin's mysterious disappearance last week. Russia has an interest in flexing its military muscle to remind everyone of the havoc it could wreak and to dissuade anyone from taking radical action in Ukraine. The United States has been careful when it comes to Ukraine, even delaying the deployment of 300 U.S. troops to western Ukraine as part of a training exercise. The United States maintains, however, that this deployment is still an option and could order it as early as April. QUOTE In that context, Russia's exercises serve as threats to the opposing forces, demonstrating capabilities and suggesting intent. But they are important military tools to the Russian military as well. To maintain readiness, actually executing operations or deployments through exercises is a must. Beyond that, Russian military planners need to have a realistic understanding of the capabilities of Russian forces. There is no better way to gain this understanding than to let those forces run through operations, or parts of them, to determine the basic parameters that are feasible. As Russia tests its own capabilities, it shows the rest of the world the type of operations and the military districts it considers key in its strategic planning. Read more :- https://www.stratfor.com/analysis/russia-ta...itary-exercises This post has been edited by BorneoAlliance: Mar 19 2015, 06:32 PM |
|
|
Mar 19 2015, 06:40 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,210 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
QUOTE(junchuan @ Mar 19 2015, 06:15 PM) Actually many users of the Smart-S also use ESSM. I think the only ship that uses the Smart-S/MICA combo is Gowind. So actually its compatible with both Dcns would most likely push for their sylver vls instead of america vls. Basically a whole European packageDon't give up, there's still a tiny chance for ESSM. This eliminate essm package as they only been tested on those america vls. Unless, we are going to pay to adapt essm to syvler vls, which is highly unlikely. The best option is to either use mica or aster 15 system Aster 30 is of course most likely out. So i would say aster 15 will have better chance than essm while mica is the most likely candidate |
|
|
Mar 19 2015, 07:10 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
368 posts Joined: Oct 2012 From: Penang |
So hard to find lima air show videos
2013 got alot |
|
|
Mar 19 2015, 07:13 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
28 posts Joined: Aug 2010 |
since no one posted it yet, I will posted here the brief interview with Mr Anuar Director of the Defence & Security Division at Boustead Heavy Industries Corporation Berhad (BHIC) during LIMA 2015
|
| Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic |
| Change to: | 0.0255sec
0.28
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 7th December 2025 - 05:38 PM |