Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
121 Pages « < 12 13 14 15 16 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Military Thread V16

views
     
BorneoAlliance
post Mar 16 2015, 06:13 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2014

What Can Mussolini’s Navy Teach Us About Chinese Naval Power?

user posted image

QUOTE
Like the PLAN today, the Italians were engaged in many military innovations throughout the 1930s. For example, one article notes: “The Italian navy was impressive for its pioneering naval research into radar and its prowess in torpedo technology — the latter resulting in powerful aerial and magnetic torpedoes and contributing to the maiali, or small human-guided torpedoes — the ultimate weapons in asymmetric naval warfare.” 

Also, the post-World War I Italian Navy, similar to today’s People’s Liberation Army Navy, harbored regional aspirations. With the conclusion of the war in 1918, the Italian admirals agreed that the navy must first dominate the Adriatic Sea and then expand into the Mediterranean and the Red Sea. China has a similar sequential strategy with attempting to dominate the Taiwan Strait as well as the South China Sea, followed by a push beyond the First Island Chain, and finally projecting power all the way to the Second Island Chain and beyond.


QUOTE
The Italians also experimented with swarming tactics and underwater assault techniques, built light surface-assault craft, and substantially increased the production of motor torpedo boats. In addition, in the interwar years, the Regia Marina started cooperating with the Italian air force and created torpedo bombers squadrons. 

Today, China likewise appears to be implementing a counter-intervention strategy, although it is far from clear how important this concept is in current Chinese military thought.  (see: “This is Still the One Article to Read on Chinese Naval Strategy in 2015”). However, as I stated before, “Anyone studying the Chinese military knows that the PLA is seeing a conflict with the United States through an anti-access and area denial lens.”


QUOTE
The British concern in the 1930s is very similar to the United States’ fear of losing a single aircraft carrier to Chinese missiles; the psychological impact would be just too shocking to contemplate, yet it appears that the United States opted for the French approach and is engaging in a naval buildup to confront the ostensible growing might of the PLAN


http://thediplomat.com/2015/03/what-can-mu...se-naval-power/
BorneoAlliance
post Mar 16 2015, 06:32 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2014
Wave Energy For The Australian Navy


user posted image

QUOTE
energy generators work by converting the mechanical up-and-down motion of waves into electricity.  We’re more familiar with buoy-type wave energy generators that float on the surface and tap into surfaces waves and swells. Wave Energy’s approach is different.

Its fully submerged CETO 5 units tap into the less dramatic but more stable movement of subsurface waters.  The subsurface design insulates CETO 5 from storms, and it virtually eliminates the NIMBY factor since it is not visible from shore.  We’re also more familiar with wave energy designs that generate electricity offshore, then transmit it to shore by cable.

The CETO 5 can do that, but it can also do something quite different. It can pump water onshore at high pressure. Some of the pressurized water goes to run a standard off-the-shelf turbine, and some goes to a desalination plant.


https://cleantechnica.com/2015/03/15/first-...base-australia/

This post has been edited by BorneoAlliance: Mar 16 2015, 06:33 PM
BorneoAlliance
post Mar 16 2015, 07:51 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2014
Are China's missiles a bigger threat or trillions in debt on a bloated military ?


user posted image

QUOTE
Jerry Hendrix of the Center for a New American Security explains, the Chinese approach is to launch a slew of (relatively) low-cost missiles to overwhelm U.S. defenses:  

Using a maneuverable re-entry vehicle (MaRV) placed on a CSS-5 missile, China’s Second Artillery Division states that its doctrine will be to saturate a target with multiple warheads and multiple axis attacks, overwhelming the target’s ability to defend itself. MaRV warhead itself would use a high explosive, or a radio frequency or cluster warhead that at a minimum could achieve a mission kill against the target ship. While the United States does not know the cost of this weapons system, some analysts have estimated its procurement costs at $5 million to $11 million. Assuming the conservative, high-end estimate of $11 million per missile gives an exchange ratio of $11 million to $13.5 billion, which means that China could build 1,227 DF-21Ds for every carrier the United States builds going forward.

U.S. defenses would have to destroy every missile fired, a tough problem given the magazines of U.S. cruisers and destroyers, while China would need only one of its weapons to survive to e!ect a mission kill. Although U.S. Navy and Air Force leaders have coordinated their efforts to develop the means to operate in an anti-access/area denial (A2/AD) environment by disrupting opposing operations, the risk of a carrier suffering a mission kill that takes it off the battle line without actually sinking it remains high.


user posted image

user posted image

QUOTE
US Navy plan is to have counter missiles and offensive missiles on every ship in a plan called distributed lethality  The US Navy plans to distribute lethality throughout the Fleet, increasing combat power on each ship while ensuring those ships are more capable of operating in dispersed and network-denied environments.  So militarily will not be just hundreds and thousands of Chinese missiles versus US aircraft carriers.

It will be loads and loads of US missiles and counter missiles in a missile race.  Most enemy long-range anti-ship cruise missile (ASCMs) would likely be fired at 100-150 nm (nautical miles) or less. There are several potential missiles available to U.S. forces that could provide more than 150 nm range, such as the Norwegian Kongsberg Naval Strike Missile (NSM).


Read more :- http://nextbigfuture.com/2015/03/are-china...-threat-or.html

This post has been edited by BorneoAlliance: Mar 16 2015, 07:52 PM
hafizushi
post Mar 16 2015, 08:02 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
28 posts

Joined: Aug 2010


QUOTE(azriel @ Mar 16 2015, 05:08 PM)
i hope RMN get what they want for anti-ship missile, that is NSM instead of exocet block 3
TSyinchet
post Mar 16 2015, 08:25 PM

If you wish for peace, prepare for war
Group Icon
Elite
1,157 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
From: Petaling Jaya

Might be seeing some proposal for lekiu class mlu.
hmm.gif
azriel
post Mar 16 2015, 08:46 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
4 posts

Joined: Jan 2012
SIPRI - Malaysia 2014 - Arms Transfers.

user posted image
user posted image
user posted image
azriel
post Mar 16 2015, 08:56 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
4 posts

Joined: Jan 2012
SIPRI - Singapore 2014 - Arms Transfers.

user posted image
user posted image
azriel
post Mar 16 2015, 09:03 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
4 posts

Joined: Jan 2012
SIPRI - Thailand 2014 - Arms Transfers.

user posted image
user posted image
user posted image
SUSalaskanbunny
post Mar 16 2015, 11:39 PM

Foodie
*******
Senior Member
4,283 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
From: Vietnam

QUOTE(BorneoAlliance @ Mar 16 2015, 12:58 PM)
Ex-admiral: Group manipulated Navy procurement system

user posted image

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia...curement-system
*
pfftt... as expected...
pobox
post Mar 17 2015, 10:10 AM

On my way
****
Junior Member
551 posts

Joined: May 2013


Any live photo/updates from LIMA?
SUSRight Hand Man
post Mar 17 2015, 10:16 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Jan 2015
Guys i have this question..tried googling but couldnt find the answer..maybe coz i didnt use the correct term..but since this is military tered, i hope u ppl can help a bit.

In Challenger 2, behind the commander's cupola, there are 2 tube-lookalike. What are those? And what is it called?
azriel
post Mar 17 2015, 11:30 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
4 posts

Joined: Jan 2012
Sea trial of the Indonesian Navy Oceanography Ship - KRI Rigel.


MilitaryMadness
post Mar 17 2015, 11:37 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


Residents of Konstantinovka, in government-held Eastern Ukraine riot after a Ukraine army armored vehicle crashes into pedestrian sidewalk, killing 2 people including an 8-year old girl

user posted image

QUOTE
A freak road accident involving a Ukrainian armored personnel vehicle that killed an 8-year-old girl escalated into a series of riots in Kostantynivka, Donetsk Oblast, on March 16.

The accident took place at around 3 p.m. in the center of the city of 95,000 residents. The armored vehicle lost control on the road and hit the little girl, her aunt and her baby cousin. The aunt received heavy injuries and was taken to a local hospital, but the baby was not injured, according to the Ukrainian authorities. The aunt later died in the hospital.

The accident sparked riots and reports of gunfire in the city, where many residents do not welcome the Ukrainian authorities and troops. According to some reports from the ground, Ukrainian military installations were surrounded by angry residents and barracks were set on fire, but Kyiv Post has not been able to get an independent confirmation.

The Ukrainian authorities have said the soldiers who drove the military vehicle have already been detained. The driver was said to be driving erratically and is said to have fled the accident scene in a taxi.
“When investigation ends, those who are guilty will be severely punished,” Ukraine's Defense Ministry said in a statement. “Moreover, commanders will be held responsible for absence of proper control.”

Meanwhile, videos of unrest in Kostyantynivka have become viral in social networks. Most of them showed people shouting in the streets and fires burning. The local office of the interior ministry said protesters burned tires in the streets. Local media has accused local authorities of authorizing the use of live rounds to disperse rioters, but no confirmation has been received.



pcboss00
post Mar 17 2015, 11:41 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
177 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
QUOTE(Right Hand Man @ Mar 17 2015, 10:16 AM)
Guys i have this question..tried googling but couldnt find the answer..maybe coz i didnt use the correct term..but since this is military tered, i hope u ppl can help a bit.

In Challenger 2, behind the commander's cupola, there are 2 tube-lookalike. What are those? And what is it called?
*
Can you give the picture. Cupola? You mean turret?
OvenBaked
post Mar 17 2015, 12:02 PM

Hurricane
*****
Senior Member
726 posts

Joined: Nov 2014
From: Southern Uganda



QUOTE(Dreadstar @ Mar 16 2015, 05:43 PM)
a cat ???  cry.gif
*
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

kerolzarmyfanboy
post Mar 17 2015, 12:19 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
575 posts

Joined: Feb 2013
QUOTE(OvenBaked @ Mar 17 2015, 12:02 PM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
kucing panggang
vietnamese drooling watching this pic
BorneoAlliance
post Mar 17 2015, 12:40 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2014


Secret Service Anti-Drone Tech And A New 3DRobotics Drone Are Top Posts In This Week's Drone Roundup


user posted image

QUOTE
Published in collaboration with The Center for the Study of the Drone, this weekly feature highlights the most interesting news, commentary, art, technological developments, public policy issues, and legal developments related to drones. 

As many readers know, my academic research and writing focuses on both civilian and military drones, and The Center’s research similarly focuses on many different uses of drone technology — the roundup therefore features a mixture of civilian and military uses.

The Roundup will appear here every Monday and is mostly prepared by the Center’s staff with some input from me.  This week’s roundup features news from March 8, 2015 – March 15, 2015. 


More reading:- http://www.forbes.com/sites/gregorymcneal/...-drone-roundup/
SUSRight Hand Man
post Mar 17 2015, 02:48 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Jan 2015
QUOTE(pcboss00 @ Mar 17 2015, 11:41 AM)
Can you give the picture. Cupola? You mean turret?
*
It''s on the turret..behind the commander's hatch..or cupola.
I mean this one :

user posted image

This post has been edited by Right Hand Man: Mar 17 2015, 02:48 PM
DDG_Ross
post Mar 17 2015, 03:32 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
27 posts

Joined: Feb 2014
From: Somewhere in the pacific, or indian ocean


QUOTE(Right Hand Man @ Mar 17 2015, 02:48 PM)
It''s on the turret..behind the commander's hatch..or cupola.
I mean this one :

user posted image
*
Isnt that the wiper fluid reservoir? for the commanders periscope cleaning system
SUSRight Hand Man
post Mar 17 2015, 03:35 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Jan 2015
QUOTE(DDG_Ross @ Mar 17 2015, 03:32 PM)
Isnt that the wiper fluid reservoir? for the commanders periscope cleaning system
*
Not sure what it is..hence asking. if you know it is that, then it would be great. nod.gif

121 Pages « < 12 13 14 15 16 > » 
Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0345sec    0.29    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 12:41 AM