Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 WTA the role of display quality in judging IQ

views
     
DaddyO
post Mar 18 2015, 12:40 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,255 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(ieR @ Mar 18 2015, 11:20 AM)
simple answer to your question, YES.

lets put it this way, turning it to a physical term....
printing a 8R(or extreme way, a 4R) vs a 12R poster print. which let u see more of the 'IQ' quality? (provided the DPI remains at 300dpi.)

but if a 8R with 300dpi compared with a 12R with 75dpi then its a imbalance comparison. something similar with your case.

i meet a customer yesterday, which give me a time of hell, egoish and stubborn to listen my explanation of PPI. he insist why his 24inch monitor is blur, because he compare that 24inch FHD display with a FullHD 5 inch phone. well, the pixel pitch is high, hence packing in heck of sharpness details. but again, you wont be able to see the larger picture* hence things like bokeh or the 'depths' of field, arent noticeable since everything is compress down to a smaller screen.
so to gain a good view of IQ, not only size but the PPI of monitor plays both roles.

another answer would be get a good 27inch(upsize) 4k(high dpi) monitor and it will blew you away.

(there are many other roles of IQ of displays(monitor) too, like color accuracy, color gamut, and delta e)
*
Actually another explanation is....is the monitor screen matte or glossy?

DaddyO
post Mar 18 2015, 05:12 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,255 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(Decky @ Mar 18 2015, 01:37 PM)
Monitor is matte while my surface pro 3 is glossy
*
Theres your answer. Matte monitor tend to desaturate color.


 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0128sec    0.68    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 22nd December 2025 - 07:39 AM