The SSD Thread V5, Solid State Drive
|
|
 Mar 9 2015, 03:51 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Junior Member
351 posts Joined: Sep 2010 From: alor setar, kedah  
|
QUOTE(limadekad @ Mar 9 2015, 02:00 PM) iinm the boot time is longer than 10 sec. Haven't tried file transfer yet. becnhmark your ssd using crystaldiskmark and post the result here..Nope, was using a WD Green previously. Is it just me? I've upgraded my ram to 8 gb as well.  |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 10 2015, 11:31 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Junior Member
351 posts Joined: Sep 2010 From: alor setar, kedah
|
QUOTE(limadekad @ Mar 10 2015, 11:11 AM) well, i was hoping for a noticable speed bump when i upgraded my system with an ssd and additional ram. well tbh, the sata 2 port really holding you back.. your ssd should give double the speed especially the read speed of your current setup.. even a good hdd can give 150 - 190mb/s of read speed.. by just upgraded to 270mb/s of read speed, the speed gain is insignificant. since you already have a ssd, why not just get a mobo that can support sata 3 to fully utilize the ssd performance.. what option do i have? upgrade my mobo?  |
|
|
Mar 11 2015, 08:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Junior Member
351 posts Joined: Sep 2010 From: alor setar, kedah
|
QUOTE(stromae @ Mar 11 2015, 05:07 PM) hi guys which is better... please be noted that transcend ssd370 128gb version have write speed kinda low.. only at 170mb/s.. 470mb/s write is only for 512gb and 1tb version. i think the best is lite-on 900s 128gb.my maximum budget is rm300.. LITE-ON 900S 128GB (M5PRO) 92K/82K 540/330 RM240 KINGSTON HYPER X 120G 20K/60K 555/510 RM275 TRANSCEND 370 128GB 75K/75K 570/470 RM219 PLEXTOR M6S 128GB 88K/75K 520/300 RM289 btw in my mind is transcend 370... btw my pc will bottleneck.. since still using SATA 3Gbps port.. thx.. edit: source http://www.anandtech.com/show/8792/transce...gb-512gb-review This post has been edited by arifhasim85: Mar 11 2015, 08:06 PM |
|
|
Aug 24 2015, 09:13 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Junior Member
351 posts Joined: Sep 2010 From: alor setar, kedah
|
QUOTE(lavenzo @ Aug 24 2015, 12:12 AM) hi, well i vote for longer warranty.. performance different in normal pc usage does not matter..any lite-on s900 users here? where do you claim your warranty if needed to? is there a lite-on warranty center here in KL? im thinking to get 1 from IPMART but the warranty only 1 year. sufficient enough? or transcend 370 series is better? price about the same but 3 yrs warranty i understand SSD is more reliable compared to HDD but..hard to say right... |
|
|
Dec 16 2015, 04:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Junior Member
351 posts Joined: Sep 2010 From: alor setar, kedah
|
QUOTE(kherel77 @ Dec 16 2015, 03:30 PM) Is it still reliable/worth to have RAID0 SSD nowadays? Or have single SSD that saturated SATA3 full speed out there? in term of raw performance, RAID 0 are awesome. but for general usage/gaming, performance different is negligible. if you already have 2 identical ssd, for the sake of science no prob go with RAID 0. indeed RAID 0 will increase risk of data losses, but it still far less compared to standard HDD. Thinking to have 2x120GB cheapo SSD..like L9S or M6S. however, 2x120GB SSD in RAID 0 are not recommended IMO. might as well go with single 256GB SSD. will give you better price/size. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0549sec
 0.56
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 2nd December 2025 - 02:23 PM |
Quote