http://www.catholicherald.co.uk/news/2015/...ng-richard-iii/

Hail, O Queen of Heaven enthroned.
Hail, by angels mistress owned.
Root of Jesse, Gate of Morn
Whence the world's true light was born:
Glorious Virgin, Joy to thee,
Loveliest whom in heaven they see;
Fairest thou, where all are fair,
Plead with Christ our souls to spare.



This post has been edited by yeeck: Mar 21 2015, 02:53 AM

Hi.

Something I received and I feel I should pass on.

Message from Pastor Khim Ang, Senior Pastor, River of Life Sanctuary

Church, last Wed a French Armenian prophet, Pr. Samuel Organnesyant came all the way to Malaysia for the first time. He warned:
1. The Malaysian churches to WAKE UP! They are too occupied with making money, status, materialism, self interest, lukewarmness etc.
2. There is no gray area but only two choices... Bloodshed or Revival.
3. Malaysia will be islamized with radical Islam and many will be killed.
4. Churches will be destroyed and Christians killed.
5. If Christians will repent and cry to the Lord, fast and pray earnestly, He can intervene and then revival will come.
6. God wants a people of power moving in miracles signs and wonders. Willing to pay the price. Where are they? Where are they?
7. Your prayer meetings and prayer conferences need to be powerful, not talk, talk, talk.! Worship, pray, worship, pray!! Call all to come and pray. Cry out! Get back the fire or else perish.!
8. Go tell the Church in Malaysia. I have come to bring this urgent message to Malaysia from the Lord. Choose - Revival or Bloodshed!
9. God says you must work to get at least 15% of those still in darkness to come to His Kingdom before the land can be transformed. With His empowering you can do it! Not by might, not by power but by My Spirit says the Lord.
I am passing this Word that was given last Wed. from this Armenian French prophet. He asked that the churches are to be warned and so I am just doing that.
God have mercy on us all.

hmm... the myrrh /frankincense must be sanctified first right ?

Veiling statues in Lent
April 12, 2014

Question Time by Fr John Flader

I recently visited a church at the end of Lent where all the statues and the crucifix were covered by purple veils. Why is the cross hidden from view at the very time when we should be meditating more on the passion of Christ?



Lent, until Holy Saturday was once common but now is much less so.
After the Second Vatican Council there were moves to abolish the custom altogether but it has survived.
Even more, the Bishops’ Conference of each country can decide whether to make the custom obligatory in its territory.
Where the custom is lived the crucifix and all other statues in the church are covered with a purple cloth without ornamentation from First Vespers on Passion Sunday to before the Easter Vigil.
The crucifix is unveiled after the Good Friday service, during which the cross is venerated by the faithful.
The only images not covered by a veil are those on the Stations of the Cross and any stained glass windows.
The statue of St Joseph, if outside the sanctuary, may remain uncovered during the month of March, when his feast occurs and he is specially honoured.
What is the origin of the custom?
According to Fr Edward McNamara it may have derived from a practice in Germany in the ninth century of extending a large cloth before the altar from the beginning of Lent.
This cloth, known as the “Hungertuch” or hunger cloth, hid the altar from the view of the people until the reading of the Passion on Wednesday of Holy Week at the words “the veil of the temple was rent in two.”
The veil in the temple of Jerusalem separated the Holy of Holies from the main body of the temple.
Some scholars say the custom was a remnant of the ancient practice of ritually expelling public penitents from the church at the beginning of Lent.
After the custom of public penance fell into disuse and the entire congregation was symbolically incorporated into the order of penitents through the imposition of ashes on Ash Wednesday, it was no longer possible to expel them from the church and so instead the altar, or “Holy of Holies”, was shielded from view until they were reconciled with God at Easter.
Later on in the Middle Ages the images of crosses and saints were also covered from the start of Lent.
The custom of limiting this veiling to the last two weeks of Lent, appears in the Ceremonial of Bishops in the seventeenth century.
The great nineteenth-century Benedictine liturgist Dom Prosper Gueranger gives a mystical interpretation of the veiling, based on the Gospel of St John, which was formerly read on Passion Sunday.
Just as Jesus hid himself from the Jews who wanted to stone him (cf. Jn 8:59), so by the veils he is now hidden from the world in preparation for the mysteries of his passion.
The statues of the saints are covered too since, if the Master himself is covered, so should be his servants.
Dom Gueranger also explains that while on the two feasts of the Finding and the Exaltation of the Holy Cross the cross is honoured as the throne of Christ’s victory, with its veiling in Lent it speaks to us of his suffering and humiliation.
Another spiritual interpretation of the veiling is based on the fact that in Christ’s passion not only was his divinity obscured but so was, in a certain sense, his humanity.
He was so disfigured by the blows and scourges that he was hardly recognisable as a human being.
We read in the prophet Isaiah’s depiction of the Suffering Servant, which has always been taken to refer to Christ: “As many were astonished at him – his appearance was so marred, beyond human semblance, and his form beyond that of the sons of men – so shall he startle many nations” (Is 52:14).
Likewise, we read in the psalm Jesus quoted while he hung on the cross: “But I am a worm, and no man; scorned by men, and despised by the people” (Ps 22:6).
So, in a sense, the veil hides Our Lord’s divinity and humanity, as did the wounds suffered in his passion.
Regardless of the original meaning of the veiling of the crucifix and statues, it has much to commend it as a way of helping us prepare for Our Lord’s Passover in the last two weeks of Lent.

Written by: The Catholic Leader

The process of Islamisation in Malaysia has long started. Don't really need someone from France to tell us that as it has also affected France by their easy immigration for those from the Middle East. When the Muslims are getting more in numbers, they will certainly demand more of their rights to do this and that, including changing the Constitution since they are in the majority. Catholics certainly has a role to play by not using contraception as taught by Pope Paul VI's Humanae Vitae and be more fervent in their Faith.

This post has been edited by yeeck: Mar 21 2015, 03:50 PM

Quite right Bro Yeeck, Father OC Lim has been talking about this since forever. "Creeping Islamisation" has been ongoing since the early 80s. If not, earlier. Back then, few heeded. Now more and more already realized the wisdom of his warnings!

As far as contraceptives are concerned, the Church encourages the Billings Ovulation method. This is a far more effective method compared to chemical or physical based contraceptives.

No, the Church does not encourage any form of contraceptives be they natural or artificial. Only under very serious reasons are NFP tolerated.

NFP based on BOM is taught during CMPC, the only form of contraception allowed.

http://www.usccb.org/issues-and-action/mar...amily-planning/

This post has been edited by khool: Mar 23 2015, 05:24 AM

I. CATHOLIC TEACHING ABOUT MARRIAGE AND THE REGULATION OF BIRTHS

WHAT DOES THE CATHOLIC CHURCH TEACH ABOUT THE RELATIONSHIP OF MARRIAGE?

Marriage is a permanent relationship created by God and entered into by
the free consent of man and woman. It is a relationship of love and
service, and it is a Christian sacrament.

"The intimate partnership of married life and love has been established by
the Creator and qualified by His laws. It is rooted in the conjugal
covenant of irrevocable personal consent.. .

"By that human act whereby spouses mutually bestow and accept each other,
a relationship arises which by divine will and in the eyes of society too
is a lasting one . . . A man and a woman, who by the marriage convenant of
conjugal love 'are no longer two, but one flesh' (Mt 19:6), render mutual
help and service to each other through an intimate union of their persons
and of their actions ... Christian spouses have a special sacrament by
which they are fortified and receive a kind of consecration in the duties
AND DIGNITY OF THEIR STATE" (GAUDIUM ET SPES, 48).[1]

WHAT DOES THE CATHOLIC CHURCH TEACH ABOUT PARENTHOOD?

"Marriage and conjugal love are by their nature ordained toward the
begetting and educating of children. Children are really the supreme gift
of marriage and contribute very substantially to the welfare of their
parents. The God Himself who said, 'It is not good for man to be alone'
(Gen. 2:18) and 'who made man from the beginning male and female' (Mt.
19:4), wished to share with man a certain special participation in His own
creative work. Thus He blessed male and female, saying: 'Increase and
multiply' (Gen. 1:28).

"Hence, while not making the other purposes of matrimony of less account,
the true practice of conjugal love, and the whole meaning of the family
life which results from it, have this aim: that the couple be ready with
stout hearts to cooperate with the love of the Creator and the Savior, who
through them will enlarge and enrich His own family day by day.

"Parents should regard as their proper mission the task of transmitting
human life and educating those to whom it has been transmitted. They
should realize that they are thereby cooperators with the love of God the
Creator, and are, so to speak, the interpreters of that love" (Gaudium et
Spes, 50).

DOES THE CHURCH TEACH THAT A COUPLE MUST HAVE AS MANY CHILDREN AS THEY
PHYSICALLY CAN?

No. In decisions about family size, the married couple "will thoughtfully
take into account both their own welfare and that of their children, those
already born and those which may be foreseen. For this accounting they
will reckon with both the material and the spiritual conditions of the
times as well as of their state in life. Finally, they will consult the
interests of the family group, of temporal society, and of the Church
itself" (Gaudium et Spes, 50).

WHAT DOES THE CHURCH TEACH ABOUT AN IDEAL FAMILY SIZE?

The Church has no specific teaching about an ideal family size. As
indicated previously, couples may take many factors into consideration. On
the other hand, there is a general Christian warning against
decision-making based solely on materialistic factors. Life is a gift to
be shared, and the Christian couple are called to be generous in the
service of life according to their circumstances.

For example, Pope John Paul II has noted that "decisions about the number
of children and the sacrifices to be made for them must not be taken only
with a view to adding comfort and preserving a peaceful existence.
Reflecting upon this matter before God, with the graces drawn from the
Sacrament, and guided by the teaching of the Church, parents will remind
themselves that it is certainly less serious to deny their children
certain comforts or material advantages than to deprive them of the
presence of brothers or sisters who could help them to grow in humanity
and to realize the beauty of life at all ages and in all its variety."[2]

WHAT DOES THE CHURCH SAY ABOUT METHODS OF BIRTH CONTROL?

"When there is a question of harmonizing conjugal love with the
responsible transmission of life, the moral aspect of any procedure does
not depend solely on sincere intentions or on an evaluation of motives. It
must be determined by objective standards. These, based on the nature of
the human person and his acts, preserve the full sense of mutual
self-giving and human procreation in the context of true love. Such a goal
cannot be achieved unless the virtue of conjugal chastity is sincerely
practiced. Relying on these principles, sons of the Church may not
undertake methods of regulating procreation which are found blameworthy by
the teaching authority of the Church in its unfolding of the divine law"
(Gaudium et Spes, 51).

Does the Church teach that the unnatural or artificial means of birth
control are immoral and blameworthy? Yes. In Humanae Vitae, the
first-named form of illicit or unnatural method of birth control is
abortion (n. 14).[3]

Then, "equally to be excluded, as the teaching authority of the Church has
frequently declared, is direct sterilization, whether perpetual or
temporary whether of the man or woman" (Humanae Vitae, 14). This condemns
tubal ligations, vasectomies, and the Pill.

"Similarly excluded is every action which, either in anticipation of the
conjugal act, or in its accomplishment, or in the development of its
natural consequences, proposes, whether as an end or as a means, to render
procreation impossible" (Humanae Vitae, 14). Such unnatural forms include
the Pill, the intrauterine device, foams, diaphragms, condoms, withdrawal,
mutual or solitary masturbation and sodomistic practices.

Are some forms of unnatural birth control worse than others? Yes. Those
forms that act after conception has occurred to prevent the continuation
of the pregnancy participate in the additional evil of abortion. "From the
moment of its conception life must be guarded with greatest care, while
abortion and infanticide are unspeakable crimes" (Gaudium et Spes, 51).

Surgical abortion is the most obvious but not the only form. The
intrauterine device (IUD) acts primarily as an early abortion agent by
preventing implantation of the week-old human life.

The birth control Pill makes the inner lining of the uterus very hostile
to implantation. It is not known how often the Pill acts in this way, but
it cannot be denied that the Pill may be acting as an early abortion agent
in any given cycle in any given woman.[4]

WHAT METHODS OF BIRTH REGULATION ARE MORALLY ACCEPTABLE?

"If there are serious reasons to space out births, reasons which derive
from the physical or psychological conditions of husband and wife, or from
external conditions, the Church teaches that it is morally permissible to
take into account the natural rhythms of human fertility and to have
coitus only during the infertile times in order to regulate conception
without offending the moral principles which have been recalled earlier"
(Humanae Vitae, 16).

Thus, the same teaching of the Church which condemns the use of the
unnatural methods of birth control explicitly approves of the use of
Natural Family Planning when there is a sufficient reason to avoid or
postpone pregnancy. With its emphasis on the necessity of a serious reason
to use even the natural methods, the Church is warning against selfishness
in family planning.

SINCE BOTH THE NATURAL AND THE UNNATURAL METHODS OF BIRTH CONTROL HAVE THE
PURPOSE OF LIMITING FAMILY SIZE, AREN'T THEY MORALLY THE SAME?

Not at all. The end does not justify the means; a common purpose does not
make morally equal all the possible means of achieving that purpose. "It
is not licit, even for the gravest reasons, to do evil so that good may
follow therefrom" (Humanae Vitae, 14). A prime purpose of the Ten
Commandments is to teach us that we may not act against our created human
nature in pursuing some purpose or pleasure. Thus, we may not kill or
steal or commit adultery to advance ourselves. The Church affirms that
efforts at birth regulation "must be done with respect for the order
established by God" (Humanae Vitae, 16).

WHY IS THE CATHOLIC CHURCH OPPOSED TO UNNATURAL BIRTH CONTROL?

The basic reason for the Church's opposition to any sort of sinful action
is that such actions are contrary to the nature God has given us. Jesus
said about marriage, "Let no one take apart what God has put together" (Mk
10:9). This can also be applied to the act of sexual intercourse which has
been called "the marriage act" for centuries of Christian history.

In the natural act of completed marital sexual intercourse, there is a
symbolic bodily unity of man and wife. However, in every form of unnatural
birth control, there is a positive effort to destroy the procreative
potential of an act that God has given us as a unique sign of married
love.

Looked at in another way, the sex act is meant by God to be a symbolic way
in which a couple are called to renew, at least implicitly, their marriage
covenant. In this bodily union, they are called to affirm anew their
original promises of married love, to take each other for better or for
worse, to be as one until death.

Unnatural birth control contradicts the symbolic renewal of the marriage
covenant. Instead, it says, "I take you for better but not for the
imagined worse of parenthood."

IS THERE A BIBLICAL BASIS FOR THE CHURCH'S TEACHING AGAINST CONTRACEPTION?

Yes. The 38th chapter of Genesis tells the story of Judah, his sons, and
Tamar. One of the sons, Onan, practiced the sin of
contraception--withdrawal in this case--with Tamar, and the Bible tells us
that God slew him because he had done an abominable thing (Gen. 38:10).

It is recognized today that Judah, Onan, and another brother were all
guilty of violating an ancient Eastern brotherhood law called the law of
the Levirate. However, the punishment for violating that law was very mild
and is spelled out in Deuteronomy 25:5- 10. Judah himself admitted his
guilt (Gen. 38:26). It is therefore clear that the special punishment
meted out to Onan was not just for the violation of the Levirate but
rather for the way in which only he had sinned--his contraceptive behavior
of going through the motions of the covenantal act and then "spilling his
seed" (Gen. 38:9).

This interpretation is backed up by the only incident in the New Testament
where immediate death is the punishment for sin--the deaths of Ananias and
Saphira who went through the motions of a giving act but defrauded it of
its meaning (Acts 5:1-11).

ARE THERE ANY OTHER BIBLICAL REFERENCES TO BIRTH CONTROL?

Probably yes. In the New Testament, it is possible that the Greek
"pharmakeia" refers to the birth control issue. "Pharmakeia" in general
was the mixing of various potions for secret purposes, and it is known
that potions were mixed in the first century A.D. to prevent or stop a
pregnancy. The typical translation as "sorcery" may not reveal all of the
specific practices condemned by the New Testament. In all three of the
passages in which it appears, it is in a context condemning sexual
immorality; two of the three passages also condemn murder. (Gal. 5:19-26;
Rev. 9:21, 21:8). Thus it is very possible that there are three New
Testament passages condemning the use of the products of "pharmakeia" for
birth control purposes.

DOES THE BIBLE HAVE ANYTHING TO SAY ABOUT HUMAN LOVE AND SEXUALITY?

Yes. There is simply no doubt that the entire biblical notion of human
love points to the fact that man is called to subordinate "eros," erotic
love, to "agape," self-giving love. While not referring specifically to
the issue of birth control, St. Paul's most famous discourse on love is
still applicable to this discussion. It is noteworthy that he begins and
ends on the two aspects of love that are needed for the happy practice of
natural family planning. "Love is always patient and kind; . . . it is
always ready . . . to endure whatever comes" (1 Cor. 13:4, 7). Christian
husbands are also told to love their wives as Christ loved the Church and
sacrificed himself for her (Eph. 5:25). All Christians were told by Christ
on the night before His death to love one another as He loved them, a
statement that has obvious overtones about self- giving love (Jn 15:12).
St. Paul also tells his listeners that the fruits of the Spirit are "love,
joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, trustfulness, gentleness, and
self-control." He reminds them that they cannot really belong to Christ
unless they "crucify all self-indulgent passions and desires" (Gal. 5:22,
24).

The above is incomplete but serves one limited purpose. It shows that it
is legitimate to state that the religious doctrine of marital
non-contraception has a basis in Scripture and that the practice of
natural family planning with its necessity of a certain amount of sexual
self-control fits well within the Christian biblical tradition.

WOULDN'T IT BE HELPFUL IF THE BIBLE CONTAINED CONDEMNATIONS OF
CONTRACEPTION THAT WERE MORE EXPLICIT AND MORE FREQUENT?

Not really. The lack of multiple references doesn't disturb the person who
has a sense of theological realism. Such a person is aware that the Bible
could hardly be more explicit in its condemnation of homosexual behavior
(e.g. Romans 1:26-32), but those who want to justify homosexual behavior
simply dismiss the biblical texts as not relevant to today or interpret
St. Paul to mean "promiscuous" sodomy although St. Paul makes no such
distinctions. Even if the Bible were filled with explicit condemnations of
abortion, sterilization, and contraception, the same approach would be
used on such texts by those who wished to justify such behavior as
compatible with biblical Christianity.

Thus it is the belief of the Roman Catholic faith and of many other
Christians that Jesus did not leave us with only a book subject to
everyone's personal and sometimes contradictory interpretations but also
established His Church as an authoritative teacher guided by the Holy
Spirit. The constant teaching by the Church on a matter of faith and
morals is called Tradition.

IS THE CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE AGAINST UNNATURAL BIRTH CONTROL A NEW TEACHING?

No. The question of birth control has been raised many times for 19
centuries of Christian life, and the Church has always responded with a
firm and universal negative to abortion, sterilization and all forms of
unnatural birth control. The encyclical Humanae Vitae in 1968 simply
reaffirmed this universal Tradition.

DOES THIS CONSTANT TEACHING HAVE ANY SPECIAL SIGNIFICANCE?

Yes. At the Last Supper, Jesus promised repeatedly that the Holy Spirit
would lead His Church into the fullness of the truth (Jn, chapters 14-17).
When a teaching has been taught with such unanimity and constancy
throughout the centuries, those who believe in Christ have every reason to
believe that such a teaching is from the Spirit and therefore true. Some
theologians believe that this constancy of teaching fulfills all the
requirements set forth by Vatican II for an infallible teaching by the
universal ordinary teaching of the Church's magisterium.[5]

HAVE PROTESTANT CHURCHES SHARED IN THIS TRADITION?

Yes. Before 1930, no Protestant Christian church accepted contraception,
sterilization or abortion. However, in 1930 the Church of England accepted
contraception. Many churches followed that path, but there are still some
Protestant churches that reject all forms of unnatural birth control. The
Eastern Orthodox churches likewise retain the authentic Christian
Tradition against contraception.

HAVE CHURCHES THAT ACCEPTED CONTRACEPTION ALSO ACCEPTED ABORTION?

Unfortunately, some churches have accepted abortion, using the same type
of reasoning that was used to accept contraception. Fortunately, not all
have taken this step, and some are rejecting their initial acceptance of
abortion.

DO NON-CHRISTIAN RELIGIONS HAVE SIMILAR TEACHINGS?

Yes, some do. It is difficult to find specific moral teachings in some of
the non-Christian world religions. However, there is no doubt that one of
the famous Hindus of modern times, Mahatma Gandhi, was completely opposed
to unnatural birth control. He called for self-control, and his statements
in the 1920s have many similarities to the statements of Humanae Vitae in
1968.

WHAT IS THE RELIGIOUS SIGNIFICANCE OF PRIESTS OR THEOLOGIANS WHO APPEAR
CONFUSED OR NOT TO BELIEVE THE OFFICIAL TEACHING OF THE CHURCH?

The chief significance seems to be that people need to distinguish between
the authentic teaching of the Church and that of some theologians. The
Canadian bishops responded to this question with a Statement on the
"Formation of Conscience." "'To follow one's conscience' and to remain a
Catholic, one must take into account first and foremost the teaching of
the magisterium. When doubt arises due to a conflict of 'my'' views and
those of the magisterium, the presumption of truth lies on the part of the
magisterium. (The magisterium is the official teaching of the Church.) ...
And this must be carefully distinguished from the teaching of individual
theologians or individual priests, however intelligent or persuasive."[6]

HAS THERE BEEN SUCH CONFUSION BEFORE?

Yes. This is not the place for a history of such things, but special
mention might be made of the problems of the 16th and 17th centuries when
theologians went wild with moral heresies in both directions, laxism and
rigorism.

HAS THE TEACHING OF HUMANAE VITAE BEEN BACKED UP BY BISHOPS AROUND THE
WORLD?

Yes. With the exception of a very small number of hierarchies, every
national body of bishops that has commented on Humanae Vitae has supported
it. Even where positive support was not offered, there was no real
divergence from the doctrine of the encyclical.[7]

Pope John Paul II has repeatedly reaffirmed the teaching against
contraception, sterilization and abortion.[8] The World Synod of Bishops in
1980 reaffirmed this Tradition, and both the Pope and the Synod have
referred to this teaching as a divine precept.[9]

In the United States, the Catholic bishops reaffirmed the Tradition
immediately after Humanae Vitae[10], again in their specifically moral
pastoral[11] and again in documents on religious education.[12]


II. NATURAL FAMILY PLANNING: THE SOLUTION

HAS GOD PROVIDED ANY MORALLY ACCEPTABLE METHODS OF BIRTH REGULATION
BESIDES TOTAL ABSTINENCE?

Yes. In His providence, God has provided natural means of birth regulation
sufficient for our sociological needs. From the creation of the first
family, breast-feeding has provided a certain amount of spacing between
babies. More recently, other natural methods have been developed.

CAN BREAST-FEEDING REALLY SPACE BABIES?

Yes. More pregnancies are postponed throughout the world through
breast-feeding than through any of the methods that can be called
conscious efforts at birth regulation. However, this is true only of
"ecological" breast-feeding in which mothers are constantly with their
babies who in turn suckle frequently. This natural form of pregnancy
postponement is morally acceptable. (Further documentation may be found
in Does Breast-feeding Really Space Babies?[13]

The usual spacing of babies with ecological breast-feeding ranges between
18 and 24 months. Thus the Author of Nature seems to have designed Nature
so that mothers should be with their babies, nurse, and enjoy a natural
spacing between pregnancies.

WHAT ABOUT "RHYTHM"?

The first type of Natural Family Planning based on periodic abstinence was
Calendar Rhythm. This was used during the 1930s. It could be just as
effective as the barrier methods then available (condoms, diaphragms) if
the woman had regular cycles and if she were properly instructed. However,
because of a combination of cycle irregularity and generally inadequate
instruction, Calendar Rhythm was unreliable for many couples. It must be
emphasized that the modern method, of Natural Family Planning are very
different from Calendar Rhythm.

WHAT ARE THE MODERN METHODS OF NATURAL FAMILY PLANNING?

The two most popular modern methods of Natural Family Planning are the
Sympto-Thermal Method and the Ovulation Method. Both of these methods are
based on an awareness of a woman's present signs of fertility or
infertility. Thus, they are both a far cry from Calendar Rhythm which was
based only on past cycle history.

The Sympto-Thermal Method makes use of changes in a woman's cervical mucus
pattern and changes in her basal temperature pattern, and some women also
record physical changes that occur in the cervix. These signs of fertility
and infertility are used in a cross-checking way. The Ovulation Method
uses only the mucus pattern.

HOW DO THESE MODERN METHODS OF NATURAL FAMILY PLANNING WORK?

Modern Natural Family Planning (NFP) methods enable a couple to identify
the times of fertility and infertility of the wife. Couples seeking to
achieve pregnancy have coitus (sexual intercourse) at the most fertile
time. Couples seeking to postpone or avoid pregnancy have coitus only
during the infertile times and avoid genital contact during the fertile
time.

DOES NFP REQUIRE EXTENDED PERIODS OF CONTINENCE?

Usually not. Some couples may have only a week of abstinence per cycle,
and most couples will not have more than the 12 to 14 day period of
abstinence that has been practiced by Orthodox Jews for approximately
3,000 years. With the grace of Christ and the power of the Holy Spirit,
many couples are finding that the abstinence of NFP is not a drawback but
a definite asset for their growth as a married couple.

HOW EFFECTIVE ARE THE MODERN METHODS OF NFP?

Both are highly effective when properly used, but in comparative studies,
experience has shown that the Sympto-Thermal Method (STM) may be easier to
teach and to learn than the Ovulation Method and that it has higher
overall effectiveness rates. The STM has effectiveness rates in the same
range as the Pill and the IUD, and it is more effective than the
contraceptive barrier methods.

HOW CAN I LEARN TO PRACTICE NFP?

The most complete book on the subject is "The Art of Natural Family
Planning."[14] The most widespread NFP education service is The Couple to
Couple League. For further information about learning NFP or establishing
a CCL chapter, contact the League at an address at the end of this
pamphlet.


III. THE MARITAL EFFECTS

HOW DOES THE USE OF UNNATURAL BIRTH CONTROL AFFECT MARRIAGE?

In general, it has a negative effect. The growing use of unnatural birth
control since 1913 has been accompanied by an almost 500% rise in the
divorce rate. Among Catholics, the divorce rate formerly was much lower
than the national average, but the divorce rate has risen sharply since
the mid-1960s when Catholics began using unnatural birth control at about
the same rate as the rest of a culture that is no longer Christian.[15] Even
if other factors have contributed to the breakdown of family stability,
there are ample indicators that the use of unnatural birth control has
been a significant factor.

HOW DOES THE USE OF NFP AFFECT MARRIAGE?

The general effect is positive. Many couples who have left unnatural
methods of birth control have reported an improved marriage relationship
with NFP. This has been confirmed by scientific social studies[16][17]
and by informal surveys showing an extremely low divorce rate among
couples practicing NFP.[18]

Improved communication, absence of feelings of being used, development of
non-genital courtship, peace of conscience, and no fear of the dangerous
effects of some unnatural methods have all been mentioned as contributing
to the improved relationship. In addition, the practice of NFP helps to
develop the same character strengths that are necessary for marital
fidelity and life-long marriage.

Summary. God is love and the Author of life and human sexuality. Authentic
religion is concerned with sex because sex is concerned with love and with
life. God is truth, and it is Catholic belief that the Church is guided by
the Holy Spirit in teaching the truth about love--including sexual love.
"If you make my word your home you will indeed be my disciples you will
learn the truth, and the truth will make you free." Jn 8:31-32

--John F. Kippley

Imprimatur: Most Reverend Daniel E. Pilarczyk, V.G.
Archdiocese of Cincinnati
February 25, 1981
Cincinnati, Ohio


ENDNOTES

1. Vatican II, "Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the Modern World."
Subsequent references are solely within the text and use the common name
of this document derived from the first words of its Latin text, "Gaudium
et Spes.' References are to numbered sections in the official text.

2. Pope John Paul II, homily at Mass on the Washington Mall October 7,
1979.

3. Pope Paul VI, encyclical letter titled "Humanae Vitae," July 25 1968.
References are to numbered sections within the official text.

4. "The Pill and the IUD: Some Facts for an Informed Choice "(Cincinnati:
The Couple to Couple League) 1980.

5. This has been developed by John C. Ford, S.J., and Germain Grisez,
"Contraception and the Infallibility of the Ordinary Magisterium,"
"Theological Studies," 39:2 (June, 1978) 258-312.

6. Canadian Catholic Conference, "Statement on the Formation of
Conscience," n. 41, December 12,1973

7. Marcellino Zalba, "The Magisterium of the Pope and of the Episcopal
Conferences...," "Natural Family Planning" (Milwaukee, WI.: DeRance, Inc.)
1980, 215-218.

8. Noteworthy affirmations of "Humanae Vitae" by Pope John Paul II include
his statement to the bishops of the United States (October 5, 1979) and
his "Message to Christian Families," 5th General Assembly, World Synod of
Bishops, October 25, 1980 ("Origins" 10, Nov. 6,1980).

9. John Paul II, "Message to Christian Families" op cit Synod of Bishops,
"The Message to Christian Families," nn 9-11, October 25,1980. (Origins
10, Nov. 6,1980)

10. National Council of Catholic Bishops, "Human Life in Our Day" November
15, 1968.

11. NCCB, "To Live in Christ Jesus" (Nov. 11 1976) pp. 17-18.

12. NCCB, "Sharing the Light of Faith" (1979) nn 105-B, 131.

13. "Does Breast-feeding Really Space Babies?" (Cincinnati: The Couple to
Couple League) 1980.

14. John and Sheila Kippley, "The Art of Natural Family Planning"
(Cincinnati: The Couple to Couple League) 1979.

15. For further evidence, see "The Legacy of Contraception: Fornication,
Divorce, Abortion" (Cincinnati: The Couple to Couple League) 1980.

16. Mary Peter McCusker, "Couples' Perceptions of the Use of Fertility
Awareness Methods of Natural Family Planning on Their Marriage
Relationship," (Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America) A
Master's degree thesis, June, 1976.

17. Joseph Tortorici, "Conception Regulation, Self Esteem and Marital
Satisfaction among Catholic Couples: Michigan State University Study,"
"International Review of Natural Family Planning" 3:3 (Fall, 1979) 191-205.

18. One survey showed that less than 1% of responding NFP users had been
divorced and remarried. (Nona Aguilar, "No-Pill No- Risk Birth Control"
(New York, Rawson Wade) 1980, 104-105) Priests with long experience in
Catholic marriage tribunals have said that in almost all cases of divorce
it has been preceded by unchastity--either contraception during the
marriage or by premarital sex or both.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
c 1981 The Couple to Couple League International Inc.

Further Information

For further information about Natural Family Planning (NFP), for referral
to Couple to Couple's NFP instruction in your vicinity, or for information
on self-instruction contact:

The Couple to Couple League
P.O. Box 111184
Cincinnati, OH 45211
(513) 661-7612

This information is from a brochure titled "What Does the Catholic Church
REALLY Teach about Birth Control?" The brochure and related material may
be ordered from Couple to Couple League direct or through CRNET's Catholic
MarketPlace.


Source: https://www.ewtn.com/library/MARRIAGE/CCLBC.TXT

Thanks bro, was also looking for that EWTN article ... lucky you managed to find it!

The point I'm trying is make is that, there are some Catholics who are trying to lower the bar to use NFP when they have no grave reasons to do so. This is not in accordance with the mind of the Church when it tolerates NFP.

Still, NFP is accepted. So no issue ...

Only under certain grave situations.

...

This post has been edited by khool: Mar 23 2015, 05:17 PM

ah here is ur home.

I think I need God

Everyone needs God. Even militant atheists.

The last two weeks of Lent are centered around the death attempts on Jesus life by the Jewish authorities. His betrayal, arrest, mock trials, beatings, the final “Via Doloroso” and crucifixion and death of Jesus on the cross.



And he shall grow up as a tender plant before him, and as a root out of a thirsty ground: there is no beauty in him, nor comeliness: and we have seen him, and there was no sightliness, that we should be desirous of him:

Despised, and the most abject of men, a man of sorrows, and acquainted with infirmity: and his look was as it were hidden and despised, whereupon we esteemed him not.

Surely he hath borne our infirmities and carried our sorrows: and we have thought him as it were a leper, and as one struck by God and afflicted.

But he was wounded for our iniquities, he was bruised for our sins: the chastisement of our peace was upon him, and by his bruises we are healed.

All we like sheep have gone astray, every one hath turned aside into his own way: and the Lord hath laid on him the iniquity of us all.

He was offered because it was his own will, and he opened not his mouth: he shall be led as a sheep to the slaughter, and shall be dumb as a lamb before his shearer, and he shall not open his mouth.

He was taken away from distress, and from judgment: who shall declare his generation? because he is cut off out of the land of the living: for the wickedness of my people have I struck him.

And he shall give the ungodly for his burial, and the rich for his death: because he hath done no iniquity, neither was there deceit in his mouth.

And the Lord was pleased to bruise him in infirmity: if he shall lay down his life for sin, he shall see a long-lived seed, and the will of the Lord shall be prosperous in his hand.

Because his soul hath laboured, he shall see and be filled: by his knowledge shall this my just servant justify many, and he shall bear their iniquities.

Therefore will I distribute to him very many, and he shall divide the spoils of the strong, because he hath delivered his soul unto death, and was reputed with the wicked: and he hath borne the sins of many, and hath prayed for the transgressors.

--Isaias 53

The Greatest Week - Holy Week



Life would be so nice without suffering.

Suffering is the most shocking reality in this world. A

glance at the daily news and the amount of suffering

people experience everywhere is staggering,

sickening.

Even as we look around, some of our relatives or

friends are confronted with the most dreadful

situations accompanied with pain and hardship:

physical, emotional, financial...

Suffering is so scandalous to modern man that

everything is done to escape its grip. That is the

reason why drinking, drug addiction, violence are on

the rise today. These are means to relieve the

unpleasant circumstances.

Trying to escape aches and pains do not solve

problems though and often make them worse.

The only answer to suffering, the only way of

understanding its purpose and value, resides in the

contemplation of the Passion of Our Lord Jesus

Christ.

Only the Passion gives us the key to the meaning of

suffering which is summarised in one word:

Redemption.

In itself suffering is absurd and revolting, but seen in

the light of the Passion of Our Lord, it becomes a

source of joy. Why joy? Because through suffering,

Jesus opened to us the door to His Paradise. Because

united to the suffering of Our Lord, our pain becomes

a source of merit and power.

The saints who performed the biggest number of

miracles are the saints who suffered the most.

Suffering is in no way a curse. It is the occasion to

experience the consoling presence of God and his

Might.

Suffering is a proof of the existence of God as God

alone can give the grace and power to bear the most

intolerable pain with peace and joy.

Behind suffering there is also a secret. The secret of

the love of God for us, for me, and the secret of my

love for Him...