One thread accuse him being paid or bias. The thread about RON95vsRON97 article. Everyone said he being paid for reviews. And of course lot of Proton haters dont like his review.

They wrote lengthy review and the review is consistent with other auto blog. The pros and cons is consistent with others. So what's your problem with paultan Iriz review?

This post has been edited by ruffstuff: Feb 10 2015, 11:11 PM

Thread is not about Proton. But the TS directly indicate him being bias. And everyone started to bring up about Proton review and such. And lot of people tagging him.

The Ron95/ROn97 is in fact very good article from Paultan. It just that the whole malaysian is 'pig headed' about it.

how exactly you know they being paid? Seriously people.

No. He never said that. It is not the intention of the article which one saves more fuel or not. It is to guide people who have been thinking RON97 is the 'better' fuel for their car. That's all.

Did you check it?

This is why. Lot of malaysian claiming their own test is truer than the control test done by paultan.

I'm not the one who accusing anything. You are the one who need to bring up the proof.

Fine then.

Probably the minor mistake in the article is using one brand. Although it is pretty obvious, both of the car represent the standard MPI engine v GDI with high compression ratio. People still can't relate to this.

I believe what people been experience the 'goodnes' of RON97 (if there is any) is not the effect of RON number, but the additives.