QUOTE(ericmaxman @ Feb 10 2015, 09:40 PM)
1st) pls dont say every car is good/god car/best bang for your bucks/Very interested/worth itIf so why you are not driving it as your daily ride
Block on content usage from Paultan.org
|
|
Feb 10 2015, 10:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,210 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 10 2015, 10:17 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,210 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
QUOTE(ericmaxman @ Feb 10 2015, 10:15 PM) just highlight the bad point as well... like the some case of HR-V good good good.. in end test drive sluggish second minus or reduce your portong fanboyism famoust in /k/ for that This post has been edited by thpace: Feb 10 2015, 10:18 PM |
|
|
Feb 10 2015, 10:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,210 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
|
|
|
Feb 11 2015, 12:14 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,210 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
QUOTE(ruffstuff @ Feb 10 2015, 11:20 PM) Really? Why? RON95 infact is very good article from PT. It just that malaysian people still have the mindset of RON97 is the better fuel no matter what facts you throw in. to do a real control test, you need to consider the variablesin this case, fixed variable/control - the engine of the car basically same performance and spec non-fixed/test variable - RON 95 or RON 97 His method of review even by engineering standards is rudimentary, unless the driver is a robot no one have the same driving habit. he claimed tat they switch drivers along the journey. This actually make the result even worse because now u are swapping different driving habits on all the tested vehicles which theoretically increased the randomness of the result. If one driving drive all the way until finish, at least he can claim consistent result by assuming tat one person have the same driving habit all the way. Then go to the next car and drive the same way as before. (More credible than swapping drivers) Now u are swapping 4 different fellow in one car an expect a consistent result? what he should do on in his so call real situation test is employed a dyno tester machine.. No not the kind tat improve your engine performance but rather the lab dyno testing used in university mechanical lab or engine test plant (both proton and p2 have it this is small lab type for university students to do lab test » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « And this is better dyno enginer performance (K&N) » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « I am too lazy how to explain how it works but it can be used to test diff fuel type and engine performance Publishing the result based on control lab test is more credible than i drive on road and here is my result. If u are writing scientific paper and this is your methodology, the professor will laugh and throw your paper into the bin. |
|
|
Feb 11 2015, 01:12 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,210 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
QUOTE(ruffstuff @ Feb 11 2015, 08:47 AM) The last bit is quite irony. You'll see the comment if Paultan really did a control test. They will rubbish it and ask for 'real-world' test to use Saga and Myvi. I guess u dont know really how RON number really works The fact still doesn't change that using higher number RON give benefit for normal engine compression ratio. What i believe is the different additives added to the fuel itself that produce different result. Not the RON. For higher ron fuel, to prevent knocking retardant are added in which normally longer chain of hydrocarbon into the fuel to prevent the fuel from self ignite. That the additives you are talking about, there hardly any performance additives If you want more power, you do it by adding higher octane fuel not RON. like pure ethanol, hyrogen etc etc but at the risk tat your car might explode because it not designed to operate in such high energy environment. Baciscally, the more flammable the fuels the better it is, the more power you can gain per litter of tat fuel. To calculate "scientifically' is by looking at the otto atkinson miller cycle etc the car engine is based upon. Again, it took me 4 years to learn about and I am lazy to explain it in details those themo cycles QUOTE(K3nnYkl82 @ Feb 11 2015, 09:27 AM) For me its a damn good test. adding more variables make for a more inconsistent result. The fixed variable should be the driver but instead it become the test variable as wellActual environment.. Same route.. Same jam or not.. Driver A might be more heavy footed than driver B. Thats why they swap to average it out. The key point is the car maintain same fuel. its a real life test. Control environment result are like what manufacturer advertise lo.. most oso cant get those figurea what ppl use ron97 have to justify the cost differences ma QUOTE(Quazacolt @ Feb 11 2015, 11:19 AM) kopitiam people (that guys is clearly one of them) will still rubbish what you said. In retrospect to your answer, Public uni rent those equipments for a reasonable fees for a valid reason if PT have access to those lab equipments, i think PT wouldn't be doing just simple car blogs only UM, USM, UTM and any respectable university mechnical lab will have it and it available for public use The only thing you have to do is write to the dean and explain why you want to use it. Of course, it will be more difficult to have those High performance lab like the one used in P1 and P2. The main reason why it difficult because engine fuel consumption is a closely guarded secret at least I better than some wikepedia warrior that think they know everything by reading wikepedia |
|
|
Feb 11 2015, 01:23 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,210 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
QUOTE(ruffstuff @ Feb 11 2015, 01:15 PM) nope.. i personally pump ron95 just because it cheaperThe reason why 97 is more expensive is because it marketed to high performance vehicles meaning more strict quality controls which inversely increased it base line cost. The strict quality control is just better filtering and more constant quality lab test. Again, it just marketing If want more power octane, you should ask to petronas shell etec to introduce ethanol fuel mixture, then you can get better power per litter plus cleaner burning fuel. |
|
|
Feb 11 2015, 01:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,210 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
QUOTE(Quazacolt @ Feb 11 2015, 01:19 PM) K3nnYkl82 If you, you can ask him to contact me and i will try to ask for him for a equipment loan at either of those university tiu lo, looks like another MON97 case but he sounds like professor la, write letter can straight away loan any university equipment. clueless kuli like me who know nothing besides reading up google/wiki dare not question/challenge. ok bro i just google/wiki, i know nothing. Of course he have to pay because the technician would have to set it up, It a pain in a ass to set up anyway QUOTE(newmaster @ Feb 11 2015, 01:21 PM) well, if can natural gas is better fuel if you can cramp more gas into the combustion chamber meaning higher pressuresadly, NGV run on reduce pressure environment to comply to safety requirement |
|
|
Mar 5 2015, 07:19 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,210 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
|
| Change to: | 0.0178sec
0.48
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 2nd December 2025 - 09:27 PM |