Can't deny that, but still makes good entertainment. His Suzuki Swift Sport review repeated too many times same points, ended up being funny review to me lol.

But his written articles are nice informative reads. PT not much original features eg RON95/97 test, car seats, ISOFIX, wearing seat belt, traction control etc. Then many years ago he/Harve wanted to record E30 ownership, but end up not much writeups (edi sold long time ago anyway). But nvm la, I can understand they must be always busy, can be hard to multitask, so whatever they can write is ok la by me.

actually i know of this pauline tan, she was quite pretty... but i think she married liao

I guess u dont know really how RON number really works
For higher ron fuel, to prevent knocking retardant are added in which normally longer chain of hydrocarbon into the fuel to prevent the fuel from self ignite. That the additives you are talking about, there hardly any performance additives

If you want more power, you do it by adding higher octane fuel not RON. like pure ethanol, hyrogen etc etc but at the risk tat your car might explode because it not designed to operate in such high energy environment. Baciscally, the more flammable the fuels the better it is, the more power you can gain per litter of tat fuel. To calculate "scientifically' is by looking at the otto atkinson miller cycle etc the car engine is based upon. Again, it took me 4 years to learn about and I am lazy to explain it in details those themo cycles

adding more variables make for a more inconsistent result. The fixed variable should be the driver but instead it become the test variable as well

In retrospect to your answer, Public uni rent those equipments for a reasonable fees for a valid reason
UM, USM, UTM and any respectable university mechnical lab will have it and it available for public use

The only thing you have to do is write to the dean and explain why you want to use it.
Of course, it will be more difficult to have those High performance lab like the one used in P1 and P2. The main reason why it difficult because engine fuel consumption is a closely guarded secret

at least I better than some wikepedia warrior that think they know everything by reading wikepedia

So are you saying that we should always pump RON97?

K3nnYkl82

tiu lo, looks like another MON97 case

but he sounds like professor la, write letter can straight away loan any university equipment.

clueless kuli like me who know nothing besides reading up google/wiki dare not question/challenge.

ok bro i just google/wiki, i know nothing.

no,ron 97 no good from what he write,what he mean we should pump pure ethanol, hyrogen etc etc

This post has been edited by newmaster: Feb 11 2015, 01:22 PM

nope.. i personally pump ron95 just because it cheaper
The reason why 97 is more expensive is because it marketed to high performance vehicles meaning more strict quality controls which inversely increased it base line cost. The strict quality control is just better filtering and more constant quality lab test. Again, it just marketing

If want more power octane, you should ask to petronas shell etec to introduce ethanol fuel mixture, then you can get better power per litter plus cleaner burning fuel.

If you, you can ask him to contact me and i will try to ask for him for a equipment loan at either of those university

Of course he have to pay because the technician would have to set it up, It a pain in a ass to set up anyway


well, if can natural gas is better fuel if you can cramp more gas into the combustion chamber meaning higher pressure

sadly, NGV run on reduce pressure environment to comply to safety requirement

Tackle la dia bang

thread about paultan moving to RON usage. come one peeps. lets get back to the topic.

anyhow, it's his website. those who hate his review can just let it be. no harm done to you

What trigger the issue, the the RON95/97 articles where /k/ accuse him bias/paid reviewer.

/k/ is the ESSENCE of LYN

Was a loyal reader of PT, but not anymore after all the butthurt. Sorry not sorry.

i start from read autofreak late 2013..but autofreak comment section krik..krik..krik until now...if u say paultan review paid review..autofreak oso same..just u guy read Iriz article paultan (infokereta) n compare with autofreak, funtaticko, topgear, wemotor, lifelivedrive, cbt, automania, arenakereta, autoworld, geartinggi, astroawani...all give same review..why u guy oni say paultan is paid review?

QFT.

anyone who states these sort of things i lose respect. coz the internet is full of ppl, theres definitely trolls and etc. clumping them all together as a "forum full of defamatory clowns" includes anyone who actually supports him that uses the forum.

way to go

probably because the tone of paultan is almost as if proton completely revolutionized the malaysian motoring industry

annddddddd

maybe the fact only paultan was the official web partner for the iriz launch and coverage and exclusives and nobody else ?

Never really into car thing and only click links on lowyat upon seeing it, I think PT will be losing more visits than he thought will matter.

maybe you guys should start quoting links to other sites such as http://www.autofreaks.com/ ,http://www.topgear.com/my/, sites I never knew existed, because everybody seems to be quoting PT in their threads link.

Will definitely do so.

Not sure why PT put that statement but it is not good blaming forums.

Wilson