i know what camera to buy next !

http://www.dpreview.com/articles/765883594...28mp-bsi-sensor


kills offerings from sony, Panasonic, olympus !

Too bad it has no optical/electronic viewfinder...

A lot of camera of that size and price range dont offer evf anyway except a6000. And some people dont really want the evf if it means sacrificing the lcd screen size and price tag. Personally though, if I want evf, I probably wait for nx50 or go for a6000 now. But nx500 sensor wont be a slouch if indeed on par with nx1.

This post has been edited by DaddyO: Feb 7 2015, 10:48 AM

nah... so funny
kill sony? image get mushy even with iso 400. not to mention higher iso sensitivity
kill olympus? most aps-c mirrorless focusing capability from ev 0 to 20. even entry level em10 focus capability from ev -2 to 20
kill panasonic? do u think samsumg lenses beat panasonic's leica standard & olumpus's zuiko standard?

$800 - 4K video, NX1's sensor, optically stable lens, 28MP.
name a competition

we're not talk about features, we're more concern about performance. no point if higher megapixel with smaller image sensor. plus, everyone knows of nx1 doesn't do well in high iso, and struggling while af in lowlight, whereas even cheapo em10 capable of, and better image quality

although I agree the term "kill" is a bit over the top.

but then I don't think the new Samsung sensor is lacking in comparison to sony or m4/3 sensors at all. Old one is rubbish, but the new one is a lot better for sure, based on various reviews like Dpreview or TheCameraStore.

arr... the AF-C of the em10 isn't that great to be honest, I own one and using one, using AF-S 90% of the time. The lack of PDAF sensor is obvious. Low light focusing I don't dare to be super proud with it too, probably on par with my own EOS M in accuracy, speed wise it varies from different lenses.

and again, do you think it's that bad? Samsung isn't a company who just started with little resources.

so i ask u, did u really test the new samsung mirrorless camera? i'm love samsung, tv, led screen, but not camera, is because the quality not meet up market standard

although em10 af not really fast when in lowlight condition, still, precise and better

Not really sure what you mean. I took some shots with nx300 sometime ago and the shots look perfectly fine. If you are talking about the previous nx generation which has some degradation issue pass iso 1600, maybe you have a point but current nx gens produce some superb images, granted I'm no pixel peeper.

This post has been edited by DaddyO: Feb 10 2015, 11:46 PM