Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Ultimate Discussion of ASNB (47457-V), Wholly owned subsidary of PNB (38218-X)

views
     
dasecret
post Jun 18 2015, 11:04 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,498 posts

Joined: Nov 2012
QUOTE(hyelbaine @ Jun 18 2015, 09:25 AM)
It just shocks me how gullible people can be. If only these people understood how unit trust works and stop listening to rumours, they might be able to avoid making such stupid mistakes that some are making right now  doh.gif
*
You should read the full financial statements of the fixed price funds before calling ppl stupid cool2.gif
dasecret
post Jun 18 2015, 11:45 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,498 posts

Joined: Nov 2012
QUOTE(wil-i-am @ Jun 18 2015, 11:28 AM)
Mind to share yo concern?
*
oh, my concern is not about 1Mxx
It's the underlying difference between fixed price fund and floating price fund... obviously the value of the shares they own fluctuates right? How come the price of the fund doesn't? Is that sustainable?
It's seen as low/no risk investment product, but is that a right assessment? unsure.gif

Like I say.... read the financial statements and be your own judge
dasecret
post Jun 18 2015, 02:47 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,498 posts

Joined: Nov 2012
QUOTE(hyelbaine @ Jun 18 2015, 01:58 PM)
If you've read the previous threads that you would know that this has been discussed before. It's the job of the fund manager to ensure enough liquidity to honour redemptions while at the same time ensure that funds are properly invested and well diversified to ensure that the NAV does not deviate too far from the RM1.00 while all at the same time hunting for yields.

This is the same challenge faced by fund managers such as EPF, KWAP, LTAT, TH and any other UTMC that practices the same model. To these organisations the true NAV fluctuates but for companies like ASNB who are registered UTMCs, since the trust deed and the fund characteristics are as such that the value of each unit is still RM1 regardless on the actual NAV so it is the responsibility of the UTMC to honour it.

Try recalling back to 1997/98, did EPF, TH or ASNB failed to honour the RM1 pledge? If you weren't born yet at that time, you may want to ask your parents about it. How much financially did it affect them? Who knows.

None of these organisations discloses the actual NAV as I believe that they're exempted under the rules applied MFRS so even if you read the annual report page by page you won't find the NAV. You can never ascertain the NAV because you wouldn't know at what entry point for a particular security from which the fund enter or exit from. The annual report wont tell you the cost of each and every single transaction that was made because NAV also takes into account those things.

You can glean a lot from the annual report but not everything. You want to know how well is AS1M being managed? Looked at the MER of the fund.

Investment of any form has risks. Even if you keep money under the pillow has risks.
*
I'm glad that you read the financial statements and decided that you want to go for it... nothing wrong with that. But one can come to a different conclusion after being informed of the risks

I'm just saying 'This product is often seen as low/no risk, is that the right assessment?'
Like you pointed out correctly, they are equity funds. EPF is different, they are balanced/ fixed income with some mixed assets
dasecret
post Aug 18 2015, 10:36 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,498 posts

Joined: Nov 2012
I've attempted to remind people about ASx funds, but people is this thread seem to be too defensive to pay attention
So, for the benefit of the other readers, I will just lay down the facts again...

ASx funds are 100% Malaysia equity funds, just like the public mutual funds etc - early this year KLSE was 1850 points, now left 1570 points, do you think the fund make profit or make losses? Look at all the other floating rate funds in the market, including the ASG type

How come the price for ASx funds are still fixed at RM1 per unit?

http://www.asnb.com.my/pdf/PRODUK/Master_P...314complete.pdf

Pay attention to page 31,
5.12.2 Bases of Valuation on Investments for ASB, ASW 2020, ASM, ASD and AS 1Malaysia
The introduction of MFRS requires the Funds to apply NAV in its valuation bases and processes. The SC has
specified that the Fixed-Priced Unit Trust Funds are permitted but not required to comply with MFRS 139 and MFRS
7 for the financial years ending 31 December 2012 until 31 December 2015, subject to terms and conditions imposed
by SC.

If these funds follow floating NAV, what would be the value now?

Honestly, I don't think it's so easy for the gov to steal your money from the fund, after all it's guarded by trustee and all...
But.... is your money still worth as much? particularly in a falling market?

Just be aware that this is not FD, it was never meant to be
dasecret
post Aug 18 2015, 12:01 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,498 posts

Joined: Nov 2012
QUOTE(nexona88 @ Aug 18 2015, 11:53 AM)
The bolded part. so it's mean starting 2016, all Fixed price fund change into floating NAV just like ASG or any other UTs  hmm.gif
*
I don't know... your guess is as good as mine, but I sure am not taking the risk...

Anyway, one possibility is they extend the exemption... especially if the market is doing badly and if they change to floating NAV = 0.80 per unit instead of RM1.00 per unit; I think all the retirees who holds the units would be very upset... maybe they will try to wait until floating NAV = 1.02 per unit instead of RM1.00 per unit to unfix the price... but, if this round KLSE drop till 1,000 points or less, when would that happens?
dasecret
post Aug 18 2015, 12:45 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,498 posts

Joined: Nov 2012
Ok... since I'm ready to be shot at when I opened this can of worm, might as well just go all the way

You guys are missing the point
Why are you concerned so much if it would be changed to floating?
You should be concerned of what is the real value of the NAV as at now

Bank run would only happen if the NAV is below RM1.00 per unit.... if NAV is RM1.20 per unit, everyone will be laughing and keeping the units

So... when KLSE down, if you sell your ASx and put your money in floating rate funds, say at RM0.80 per unit, few years later when market is up, you get RM1.50 per unit... isn't that better than keeping your money in ASx and pray that the NAV is still at least RM1.00 per unit

It look and smell like FD because they want to attract more conservative investors to put money into the share market and these people don't like price fluctuations....
It is really not FD, just bear that in mind whenever you want to pick up more units
dasecret
post Aug 18 2015, 01:11 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,498 posts

Joined: Nov 2012
QUOTE(Ramjade @ Aug 18 2015, 12:59 PM)
If they change to floating, the principal could be affected thus reducing the final value. So if its fixed, principal will not be affected . Dividend will be added to the principal. Hence at the end of the day, regardless what's the NAV, your prinicipal is not reduced. But you gained the dividend.

I will rather they hold it at RM1.00. At least my prinicipal will not be affected. At least you know at the end of the day, you will still get some profit rather than worry about the condition of the market. Small profit better than big profit with risk. Like dreamer said, China and Greece is not going to recover anytime soon. Some more got 2 years to go.  whistling.gif After that 2 years, I can assure you nothing will change.  sad.gif  So for the time being, in my opinion fixed price is the way to go.
Search the thread a few pages back (don't know how many)

Ok. We wait for 1st of January and see what's the condition.
*
Aiyo, 'draw until showing the instestines' also don't understand

Since you invested in a unit trust product, you should first understand how unit trust works
Net asset value is basically how much the underlying assets are worth, in this case, the malaysia shares

In a normal circumstances, the NAV will change daily based on what is the asset value
In this case, it's fixed at RM1.00 per unit. But is the underlying assets worth RM1?

Say 100% of the amount the fund has was invested in Felda stocks, at IPO price of RM5
Now Felda stock is worth RM1.90
Your RM1.00 per unit is only worth RM0.38 per unit
If everyone today decides to go redeem their RM1.00, after 38% of the ppl redeemed, there's no asset/money left. Hence why.... I too don't think they will change to floating, but I also don't want to be last one to go redeem and can't get back my money

Of course, all these are exaggeration, they would also have good stocks which appreciated over time and the NAV should not be worth so little la... I just don't like the unknown or black box approach
dasecret
post Aug 18 2015, 01:24 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,498 posts

Joined: Nov 2012
QUOTE(aeiou228 @ Aug 18 2015, 01:18 PM)
ASNB has no authority to determine whether the fund should be fixed price or variable price, the authority lies with the SC.
I guess SC has to take a look at the ASX's latest NAV before permission is granted to extend the exemption. So the question now is how good is the ASX's NAV now? Is there a way to check fixed price ASX NAV? I've tried before, I couldn't find it.
*
That's the million dollar question isn't it? sweat.gif
Tell me when you found the answer pls
dasecret
post Aug 18 2015, 02:02 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,498 posts

Joined: Nov 2012
QUOTE(Ramjade @ Aug 18 2015, 01:52 PM)
I get what you meant. But this are the only fixed price fund in Malaysia if I am not mistaken. Correct me if I am wrong. Like I said before this, if they were to change it to floating, people will make a bank run for it including me.  tongue.gif Do they want to face the consequences of that? Better for them to play safe and maintain at fixed.

Second, if really change to floating, there are 2 more fixed price funds. I don't think they going to change all 3 to floating one shot. Just transfer there lo. Just need time to run to the bank and try for units again.

Third, by NOT changing to floating price, people giving them free money you tell me they don't want especially in this time? By changing to floating price, need to "sweet talk" people to buy floating funds.  Need to spend on advertisment. Need to work with bank to offer "promo". More expenses and headache for them. See how many ads they run in the newspaper and how many banks offer FD + Variable priced ASX? Either no one is picking up the funds or they cannot reach the target. People usually advertise if they cannot sell their product/just starting out.
*
I surrender doh.gif
Good luck to you, my conscience is clear

At least I know ppl like aeiou got the point
dasecret
post Aug 18 2015, 03:21 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,498 posts

Joined: Nov 2012
QUOTE(Hansel @ Aug 18 2015, 03:11 PM)
Something just occered to me : I first bought these ASM and ASW2020 funds back in 2007 and as far as I can remember, the price has been stable and fixed at RM1.00 since then. Basng on the information abt 31 Dec 2012 till 31 Dec 2015, then can we say the fixed-price system of Rm1.00 per unit has been extended at least once, and that was around December 2012 ? Are we able to find the ann't ?
*
I'm not sure how the previous fixed price works, but it has always been fixed
As to why 31 Dec 2012, simple, MFRS 139 was effective from 31 Dec 2012 financial year ends hence it was necessary to give exemption to these funds as they do not comply with MFRS 139... but all these really doesn't matter

yawn.gif
What matters is... this is not FD, the risks of floating funds apply to these funds too....

What amazes me is... aren't you guys interested how much the underlying assets is worth? What if it's only worth RM0.50 per unit now? Why do you want to pay RM1.00 for a RM0.50 asset? Just because you were promised you can sell it for RM1.00 next time?
dasecret
post Aug 18 2015, 04:38 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,498 posts

Joined: Nov 2012
QUOTE(wil-i-am @ Aug 18 2015, 04:28 PM)
Bro, u shld refer to latest MP dated 30/6/2015 instead of 30/6/2013
*
My bad.... just asked mr google and didn't check the year

http://www.asnb.com.my/pdf/PRODUK/Master_P..._prospectus.pdf
Page 68, no change as expected
But they dont allow me to copy the texts

dasecret
post Aug 19 2015, 09:24 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,498 posts

Joined: Nov 2012
QUOTE(wil-i-am @ Aug 18 2015, 09:40 PM)
Based on ASW 2014 AR, the estimated NAV is 1.0563 -v- buy n sell price @ RM1/unit
*
Boss, can show how you get the number? snap a picture of the page or something? notworthy.gif

I searched high and low pun tak nampak anything, no balance sheet also
dasecret
post Aug 19 2015, 11:46 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,498 posts

Joined: Nov 2012
QUOTE(aeiou228 @ Aug 19 2015, 11:44 PM)
The 1% management fee for FP funds was calculated based on VOF instead of NAV, therefore it still does not reflect the actual NAV.
Whereas the management fee for VP funds is calculated based on NAV.

VOF: value of fund.

[attachmentid=4778354]
*
Spot on thumbup.gif
Was about to say the same. And annual report did warn that the MER would not be comparable to variable priced funds due to that
dasecret
post Aug 26 2015, 11:52 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,498 posts

Joined: Nov 2012
QUOTE(Pink Spider @ Aug 25 2015, 02:16 PM)
fixed price funds is just like your beloved EPF

I love to use examples and analogies...

U pass me RM100,000 to invest in a business

We have an agreement...
- Should u decide to cash out, u will only get back your capital of RM100,000
- But I also guarantee u that u won't lose your capital, if u cash out I will pay u back 100% of your capital
- It is up to my discretion to declare/pay out how much dividend to u, if at all

Scenario A
I managed to grow the business, a year later it is worth RM150,000, i.e. 50% return

But I think that I want to retain some profits for future growth, so I pay out 20% dividend i.e. RM20,000 to u, balance RM30,000 is retained.

Business value now: RM130,000
Scenario B
I made some profits for u, total profits from trading of goods were RM20,000

But I also trashed the office when I *ahem* with my secretary last night. We bought the office unit at RM50,000. If u were to sell it off now, can only fetch RM25,000. Now that's some heavy damages done brows.gif

Realised profits: RM20,000
Unrealised loss: (-RM25,000)
Business value: (-RM5,000)

But I still can pay u RM20,000 as dividend whistling.gif ph34r.gif

End up the business left value of RM75,000 only tongue.gif
That's fixed price fund for u, in a simplistic view. wink.gif
*
Thank you sifu! This is what I've been trying to say but no one in this thread seems to get. rclxms.gif rclxms.gif
dasecret
post Aug 26 2015, 11:54 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,498 posts

Joined: Nov 2012
QUOTE(szaku89 @ Aug 25 2015, 02:24 PM)
What if market perform badly, and they made looses. They lower the interest rate. But you don't loose your money which is in asx.

If you were buying stocks in klse, you have the risk of loosing much more money if the market isn't good.
*
Hmm... despite the good illustration ppl still dont understand doh.gif
dasecret
post Aug 26 2015, 12:40 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,498 posts

Joined: Nov 2012
QUOTE(Pink Spider @ Aug 26 2015, 12:08 PM)
For fixed price funds, tt's a double edged sword, sort of.

In good years, the fund managers held back some. In a way he's "hiding" the profits for future
In bad years, u will thank him for what he did on those "good" years

But hor...

How many of us bother to do the calculation to see if the fund manager short-changed us? Say for example, the fund actually made RM100M over the years, but PERSISTENTLY paid grossly lesser, maybe only paid out RM30M to investors. During an extended good market performance, u would be better off with a Variable Price fund or even investing in stocks yourself, the cilaka punya fund manager took chunks away from u. Then when bear market comes, he will take your retained profits to rescue the latecomers' arses. Cilaka betul~ tongue.gif  laugh.gif

Give and take lor...

To add...

In the long term, MOST IF NOT ALL markets will grow, on an uptrend...

I.e. if u have time on your side, u would be better off with VP funds or even investing in stocks than with a FP fund
*
For me, it's very simple, I don't like the unknown.... the real performance of the fund manager cannot be measured because the available information is not comparable

But after following this post, I understand the 'national interest' for FP funds to be in the market. Ppl really see this as a more superior than FD product, and that way the equity market will be supported by funds like this on top of EPF, KWAP etc cool2.gif

Quite clever of whoever who came up with something like this

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0585sec    0.34    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 9th December 2025 - 12:33 AM