



Photography Question for night photography
|
|
Jan 30 2015, 02:20 PM, updated 11y ago
Show posts by this member only | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
52 posts Joined: Mar 2010 |
to achieve crisp clear shots at night like these, it's a MUST to use tripod right? all of these are taken by the same photographer.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 30 2015, 02:24 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
481 posts Joined: May 2006 |
QUOTE(streethype @ Jan 30 2015, 02:20 PM) to achieve crisp clear shots at night like these, it's a MUST to use tripod right? all of these are taken by the same photographer. For longer exposure or below 1/10 shutter speed, a tripod is a must. And shoot at low ISO. And a new camera with a good noise performance sensor can make a lot of difference. This post has been edited by bcteh: Jan 30 2015, 02:25 PM |
|
|
Jan 30 2015, 02:25 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,358 posts Joined: Feb 2006 |
night photography for still object you will use tripod, very easy..
but for moving object, like car, human, you will need a good skill of diffusing flash light + a fast lens (mostly prime). |
|
|
Jan 30 2015, 06:30 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#4
|
|
Elite
2,725 posts Joined: Mar 2006 |
|
|
|
Jan 30 2015, 07:53 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
779 posts Joined: Aug 2009 |
3rd photo
Who or what's that? |
|
|
Jan 30 2015, 11:39 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#6
|
|
Elite
24,193 posts Joined: Feb 2010 From: Perak |
QUOTE(streethype @ Jan 30 2015, 02:20 PM) to achieve crisp clear shots at night like these, it's a MUST to use tripod right? all of these are taken by the same photographer. First shot taken with tripod, low ISO and long exposure » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « The remaining shots were taken with wide apertures and high ISOs, thus noneed tripod. Depending on the lighting of the environment, usually it will be challenging to get shots like these using only a kitlens and no tripod |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 30 2015, 11:40 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#7
|
|
Elite
24,193 posts Joined: Feb 2010 From: Perak |
|
|
|
Jan 31 2015, 12:06 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#8
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(streethype @ Jan 30 2015, 02:20 PM) to achieve crisp clear shots at night like these, it's a MUST to use tripod right? all of these are taken by the same photographer. not necessary.the photos you show, none of them require tripod. you can do it handheld, all depends on your setting. |
|
|
Jan 31 2015, 12:08 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#9
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(hiansitt @ Jan 30 2015, 02:25 PM) night photography for still object you will use tripod, very easy.. for still subjects, you can just handheld. tripod not necessary.but for moving object, like car, human, you will need a good skill of diffusing flash light + a fast lens (mostly prime). for moving subjects, again depends on what effect you want and how you set. can go without tripod, and does not require diffusing flash and does not require prime / fast lenses. it all depends on how far you're willing to push the ISO, balance with the shutter, holding technique and whether image stabilization is available. |
|
|
Jan 31 2015, 09:15 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,255 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
QUOTE(goldfries @ Jan 31 2015, 12:08 AM) for still subjects, you can just handheld. tripod not necessary. The advice a bit generic. To TS, dim your room or go out to your backyard with some light at night, set up your preferred focal length and take some shots by holding it as still as possible. Test different settings by slowing down the shutter speed and ramping up the ISO. for moving subjects, again depends on what effect you want and how you set. can go without tripod, and does not require diffusing flash and does not require prime / fast lenses. it all depends on how far you're willing to push the ISO, balance with the shutter, holding technique and whether image stabilization is available. If it turns out blurry or too noisy, better invest in tripod and primes if you intend to do a lot of night shots. Lower f stops lens like f/2 compare to f/3.5 makes a lot of difference. On the other hand, if your test shots turns out ok because you got steady hand, you still have to deal with moving subjects. |
|
|
Jan 31 2015, 02:45 PM
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
it's generic because the question is not specific.
|
|
|
Jan 31 2015, 06:16 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
633 posts Joined: Jan 2012 |
QUOTE(goldfries @ Jan 31 2015, 05:08 AM) for still subjects, you can just handheld. tripod not necessary. Totally agree.. master your holding technique and more than half the battle is yours.. know your lens focal length / shutter speed and you can determine the results.. These are all old school skills... for moving subjects, again depends on what effect you want and how you set. can go without tripod, and does not require diffusing flash and does not require prime / fast lenses. it all depends on how far you're willing to push the ISO, balance with the shutter, holding technique and whether image stabilization is available. |
|
|
Feb 2 2015, 11:00 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,289 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Stairway to Heaven |
All those pics are not taken with tripod. If you see these pics, the places are rather well lit, and the point of interest are placed so that they are well exposed.
Like what the rest said, there are many ingredients to taking a good shot at night. Handling technique, high ISO camera, fast lens, composition, image stabilization However, for landscape night photography, tripod is a must because every ounce of light is important and low ISO is preferred. |
| Change to: | 0.0148sec
1.03
5 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 22nd December 2025 - 03:55 PM |