Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
18 Pages  1 2 3 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Military Thread V15, Gong Xi Fa Cai; Huat ah

views
     
thpace
post Jan 24 2015, 10:06 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
time to add tis into our arsenal brows.gif brows.gif

was told.. it like budget alternative to Hellfire on attack heli and come with ground variant also laugh.gif

user posted image

QUOTE
MIZRAK-U, developed by ROKETSAN primarily for use from assault helicopters is an anti – tank missile system. It is, with the advanced technology it has, highly effective against all armored threats in the field

Properties of the Product

MIZRAK-U, with its Imaging Infrared Seeker and Laser Seeker options, is an antitank missile, having a range of 8 km and lock on before / after launch and “fire and forget / fire and update” properties, used against armored targets, from Air to Ground as well as Ground to Ground.

Basic Properties

    Insensitive munitions (Level V)
    Tandem warhead effective against reactive armors
    Integration to various platforms (helicopter, UAV, land vehicle, stationary platform, light attack aircraft, naval platform)
    IIR or Laser Seeker options
    Lock on before / after – launch
    Fire and forget / Fire and update properties
    RF data link
    Smokeless composite solid propellant
thpace
post Jan 24 2015, 11:40 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
those wheel spg are still very much manual labor

Tracked variant are almost automatic from entering rounds and placing propellants


I hope K9 could be selected for our SPG or at least take turkey T-155 tongue.gif
thpace
post Jan 25 2015, 10:12 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(RobUlstan @ Jan 25 2015, 07:10 PM)
Hi guys, just want other's opinion. What do you think of our new digital camo? This particular picture does not really give good impression, but of course it's just one picture. The tan color especially seems jarring when contrasted to high vegetation areas. Maybe it works better in urban areas?
*
It designed for long range recon photo.. meaning u see from far u see pixelated picture when you zoom in.

That what digital camo are for..

This is just basic.. normally under combat or training, the crew will put vegetation onboard for added camo haha
thpace
post Jan 26 2015, 10:11 AM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
Advance air defence?

Maybe letak jernas and call it advance already...tat time memang ponyoh betul

This post has been edited by thpace: Jan 26 2015, 10:12 AM
thpace
post Jan 26 2015, 11:11 AM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(Dreadstar @ Jan 26 2015, 10:22 AM)
advance air defense ? now im confused .. we boosting our assets in east sabah not only for pilaks izzit? all sifu here minta pencerahan please. there is ''elephant in the room'' i guess...

hmm.gif  icon_question.gif LTZ
*
china got new base very nearby... so go figures

i think essom is more like secondary obective.. the obvious china base is more pressing

QUOTE(hafizushi @ Jan 26 2015, 10:22 AM)
we should be looking for something like medium 60-80km range SAM, i dont know what the best maybe patriot or samp/it while S300 would be to much nanti neighbor bising  laugh.gif
*
s300 is old system.. s400 better
since s500 aleady in production

QUOTE(wanvadder @ Jan 26 2015, 10:29 AM)
nak sumpit apa dengan S-300?

I believe we should get something quality, and affordable in quantity, so that we can spam if required
*
jet china

QUOTE(atreyuangel @ Jan 26 2015, 10:34 AM)
aku bagi hint
MRAD

hahahhaa
*
MEADS? Ada keh US nak bagi? whistling.gif whistling.gif
thpace
post Jan 26 2015, 11:25 AM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(KYPMbangi @ Jan 26 2015, 10:36 AM)
lol yup.. maybe only mid-range sam but certainly not s300 on sepanggar, nanti brunei mintak balik blackhawk pulak
or they could get the skyguard and be done with it

user posted image
*
If s300 can cover brunei airspace... i think they would be more than happy..

It obvious they are relying on us for defence help also.

It been hinted also several time also
QUOTE(KYPMbangi @ Jan 26 2015, 10:50 AM)
The problem is.. sepanggar aje ke? lumut di anak tirikan.. kesian..
*
Lumut still far away.. i more concern on our air force base at kelantan. Anyway military operation obvious is to take our their air force base 1st.. no plane basically sky dominance for enemy.

Tat time even ship are sitting ducks
thpace
post Jan 26 2015, 11:25 AM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(OvenBaked @ Jan 26 2015, 11:21 AM)
Jangan2 yang ni laugh.gif

user posted image
*
Manpad.... ni lagi ponyoh betul...
thpace
post Jan 26 2015, 11:32 AM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(Dreadstar @ Jan 26 2015, 11:30 AM)
that one super advance ..

yang ini pun ok

user posted image
*
Pantsir is considered point defence... does not even come.close to.medium range.. max 20 to 25km

Then again.. we did show some interest it last time... for base defence.. good enough

This post has been edited by thpace: Jan 26 2015, 11:34 AM
thpace
post Jan 26 2015, 11:32 AM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(waja2000 @ Jan 26 2015, 11:31 AM)
went china Yongshu Airbase complete,
we will more relationship with china air force, they can easy fly  sabah and penisular for exercise or visit
*
Or other "kind" of visit... hehehe
thpace
post Jan 26 2015, 11:40 AM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(waja2000 @ Jan 26 2015, 11:34 AM)
remember mou
at the end maybe will get LY-80 SAM defense  system . brows.gif  brows.gif
*
Well.. i would say depends..

I managed to talk to some atm buddy.. they say they would like to avoid china stuff as much as possible.. any future confrontation sure would be china.. u nak pakai benda ya mereka buat?

Baik aku beli benda russia or murica biarpun mahal. Again that their view lah... the one tat make final decision is always our gomen.. tat why if china no tender, atm would be very happy because compared to other system china sure will offer the cheapest..

and tis alone will get the top political leader open eyes.. get cheapest can already.. good enough no need get expensive one
thpace
post Jan 26 2015, 11:42 AM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(Dreadstar @ Jan 26 2015, 11:38 AM)
kalau kita beli ini ..indon and pinoyland sure bising.
*
Indon dah considering nak beli.. if we buy they canot bising also

Pinoy... itu buat bising pandai.. benda tak ada

Plus, vietnam pun ada their new s300 pmu2 iinm.. tak nampak other asean bising pun

Again.. if any confrontation.. vietnam would be the 1st to kena
thpace
post Jan 26 2015, 12:11 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(Dreadstar @ Jan 26 2015, 11:51 AM)
bcoz vietnam surrounding neighbors tak sama macam malaysia. u know la our neighbor .. baru kita bina lighthouse they want war already. when sabah sarawak join malaysia last time those two country already bising. 1 of them even serang kita.
*
Tu memang indo political gimmick for years

Want gain voters? Ganyang malaysia.. hidup indon.. burn malaysia flag.. throw shit to embassy.

But they know.. if they lay a hand on us, they will sure kena from others. We just a silent dog tak nak buat problem. Bising bising lah.. we just silently obliged asal tak gigit can ad. Bark all u want

Pinoy... is all bark but langsung no bite to back up

Thailand? Tat one is lalang maximun.. not to my benefit.. no neeed support

Singapore. Can say it maybe our closest ally unlike wat others always describe. Want military hardware who to benchmark? Singapore la..


QUOTE(KYPMbangi @ Jan 26 2015, 11:53 AM)
Korea yes, taiwan no
Korea I think their deal usually involves "you must buy in XX quantity" style
*
Korea benda mahal... bukan murah pun k2 black panther my favourite is one good example. Canggih but expensive like shit satu biji plus still canot full production because mtu problem

If we buy taiwan.. i can see prc official.. one eyebrow naik already
thpace
post Jan 26 2015, 12:19 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(waja2000 @ Jan 26 2015, 12:01 PM)
well no so enmity to china ....
Indo/Thailand also use china defense product .... our army also use FN-6
china product some is good and cheap. reduce cost procurement and operation cost
S-300 each set cost usd 500 milion with 16 missile.  S-400 expected around usd 800 million per-set,
how much we can buy? what can do with 16-32 missile.
defense missile is burn money and consumption war, unless can keep big quantity like 100~200 pcs missile, if not no make different.
we do more relationship with china, which can help more to develop the country.
*
Small arm deal just to please china only

Our relationship with china is a complex one compared to others country..

Like singapore.. it purely economic relationship

Like vietnam and pinoy.. it purely confrontation

We pulak sit in between.. we need china economic might but we dont want china snooping around our waters

China also the same. They value our relationship but they also want expend their influence especially in sea. In vietnam and pinoy case.. it simple, just direct confrontation

In our case.. they have to account past relationship. That why both china n malaysia have not been vocal of each others but at each back side preparing a dagger to stab each others when either one made the wrong move.
thpace
post Jan 26 2015, 12:27 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(madoka @ Jan 26 2015, 12:17 PM)
K2 is already in full production, the transmission problems already solved

KSAM is more like Vena missile system and they cost less because South Korean order them in large number already
*
The problem was their locally made transmission system. Gears fitting and break not working properly

For now.. they buy german mtu like the one used in our pt91m for initial production. Not fully solved but rather to please the public because of the balloning cost of the K2 program. One of the most expensive tanks

In back scene.. they still want to use their own local mtu and are stilling trying the solve the problem.

Turkey cleaver.. buy their design but put german mtu inside straight. No need headache, only later delevop their own mtu
thpace
post Jan 26 2015, 02:20 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(madoka @ Jan 26 2015, 02:18 PM)
there is pic of insurgents with their loots after battle with Ph. Special Police Forces, you can see the helmets and the body armor

[attachmentid=4317992]
*
free body armor n guns

siapa tak nak especially insurgents laugh.gif

Pinoy really fail or farked up big time.. 200 special force dead or injured or captured.. Siapa nak retrain

This post has been edited by thpace: Jan 26 2015, 02:21 PM
thpace
post Jan 26 2015, 03:14 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(MrUbikeledek @ Jan 26 2015, 02:56 PM)
Multi-layered Air Defence

Long/Medium Range - S-400/Patriot/BUK-M2/SAMP-T
Short Range - Jernas/ADATS/Pantsir(missile)
Very Short range - Stinger/Starstreak/Igla
Point defence - Skyshield/Pantsir (guns)
*
one fourmmer mentioned about our actual air defence plan before our financial crisis threw the plan away. According to him, this was what they (armed force) envisioned for our national air defence system

very short range- various manpad (actually already completed)
Short range - pantsir ( we are interested and wanted to join in the development. When we bought our MIGs, we were asked by russian if we are interested)
Medium range - buk system ( or medium range missile on s300)
long range - s300 system (could come later but idea was to equid it with medium range first and long range upgrade later on) rolleyes.gif

Iiinm vietnam also did theirs like tis.. lower initial purchase cost.. and when need to upgrade, just buy more launcher and long range missile. Actually no need launcher, just new long range missile canister sweat.gif

why all russian? Well before 1997 financial, if we were to ask for patriot from US. They would definitely not sell to us partially because of Mahathir also tongue.gif
European weapon industry have not matured

This post has been edited by thpace: Jan 26 2015, 03:26 PM
thpace
post Jan 26 2015, 10:21 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(waja2000 @ Jan 26 2015, 04:45 PM)
i means later in kopitian later will have fully of people comdam RMAF/Gov, "tak boleh terbang" topic haha  biggrin.gif
*
German one was not equip with paratrooping equipments because want to meet delivery date
Now, can only do cargo lifting

I not sure how ours going to be.. airbus notorious for having problem. I not sure why we are even buying more from them. Even our ec725 does not come problem free shakehead.gif

QUOTE(madoka @ Jan 26 2015, 04:46 PM)
other alternative if you not fond of about Chinese system

EuroSAMPT with Aster 30 or Chu SAM Type 03 with her AESA radar

or Akash Missile System of India
*
If u want long range mobile missile defence.. only one name very synonymous in every arms market brows.gif brows.gif

The russian s-series missile defence system... s300 was so successful even russian didnt expect it. That why production just stop even though it a 80s design system. Murica still fear

what best, russian will sell it to anyone without restriction if you have the money laugh.gif
thpace
post Jan 26 2015, 11:06 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(waja2000 @ Jan 26 2015, 10:55 PM)
our sentiment,
for time being is hard to buy missile from Russia .....
"buy missile from country which missile kill our rakyat (Mh17) .or "buy missile to kill more plane (you know).... " i dont think gov want get this blame  ohmy.gif
*
buk was already in short list for medium range air defence
when this happens whistling.gif

even if russian purchase were to made.. i am sure it will be discreet
thpace
post Jan 27 2015, 12:21 AM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Jan 27 2015, 12:01 AM)
Wah, like that throw away all 5.56mm ammo la, because used to kill the soldiers at Lahad Datu. Idiots.... tongue.gif
*
whistling.gif

dont have to be tat harsh.. even if we were to purchase russian sam, i am sure it will be discreet. SAM system is not something every nation like to show around laugh.gif
thpace
post Jan 27 2015, 12:33 AM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(madoka @ Jan 26 2015, 10:24 PM)
I am agree with that, S-300 is AK-47 in Long Range SAM world, but the cost is expensive two brigade will costing about 1,1 billion US dollar right now  drool.gif
*
depending on missile package i would say

Vietnam bought medium range missile canister first then only upgrade to long range cannister

the radar was bought upgraded from Ukraine stock

i dont think it tat expensive..Past Iran now cancelled deal for five S-300 missile batteries was only $800 million..
That was without missiles package yet i guess.. but again 1.1Billion for 2 batteries is far over estimate.
If that so expensive, vietnam would even be able to afford it biggrin.gif

This post has been edited by thpace: Jan 27 2015, 12:35 AM

18 Pages  1 2 3 > » 
Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0555sec    0.48    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 5th December 2025 - 06:48 PM