QUOTE(lin00b @ Dec 26 2008, 04:15 AM)
because fd is offering 3-3.5% per year, if you dont touch it and let the interest accumulate, you will get back more than 40% in the 15 years.
other pros of fd is that the money is liquid, meaning if you find a better investment vehicle in 2-3 yars time, you can transfer the money from fd into it without losing anything.
for most cap protect fund, the usual term is that you have to keep the fund till mature (ie 15 years) only can you take back your capital, if you withdraw in 2-3 years you may not get back full 40k.
hench its important not to get fooled by big figures and start to think in annual rate of returns. only then can you compare apple with apple
Thanks for answering my question

Just to clear my doubts, I would like to ask a further question. Assuming I put in 1K everyyear, i get 5% every year, I would have the following tabulation (Cut & paste from Excel):
Year |Input| |Amt in a/c||Interest for present year| |Amt in a/c for present year with interest|
1 1,000 1,000.00 50.00 1,050.00
2 1,000 2,050.00 102.50 2,152.50
3 1,000 3,152.50 157.63 3,310.13
4 1,000 4,310.13 215.51 4,525.63
5 1,000 5,525.63 276.28 5,801.91
6 1,000 6,801.91 340.10 7,142.01
7 1,000 8,142.01 407.10 8,549.11
8 1,000 9,549.11 477.46 10,026.56
9 1,000 11,026.56 551.33 11,577.89
10 1,000 12,577.89 628.89 13,206.79
11 1,000 14,206.79 710.34 14,917.13
12 1,000 15,917.13 795.86 16,712.98
13 1,000 17,712.98 885.65 18,598.63
14 1,000 19,598.63 979.93 20,578.56
15 1,000 21,578.56 1,078.93 22,657.49
In 15 years, I would have received a total of RM 7657.49 from the interest, which is 48.95% from the RM15,000 that I have put in 15 years (i.e. 15000-7657.49/15000). If I divide that 48.95 by 15 years, I would have 3.26 %<--- what does this ratio means?
So offence yah... cause basing my understanding from what I gather above, I still dont understand what does this ratio means, and why it is being compared with the F.D. rate of
3-3.5% per year, because I would compare
3-3.5% per year rate with the
5% per year rate, which seems more like comparing an apple with apple. Please help me understand
Sorry yah, i am abit confused loh, because if F.D. is giving me
3-3.5% per year, as compared with
5% per year, that in itself is already a comparison between apple and apple... but I would agree that FD is more liquid.. that at least I can understand.
This post has been edited by kittybunny: Dec 28 2008, 11:24 AM