Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
NVIDIA GeForce Community V14
|
raydenex
|
Jan 16 2015, 08:31 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Minecrafter @ Jan 16 2015, 08:29 PM) If only i've a bigger budget..or the price is around R9 270.  plus the R9 270 is a decent card.  Well,not as good as GTX960 for sure. you wait so long, the budget should be increasing with every month pass by, unless you're not saving. that being said.. buy current gen, not 2 gens ago card.
|
|
|
|
|
|
raydenex
|
Jan 18 2015, 02:03 PM
|
|
http://wccftech.com/nvidia-geforce-gtx-960-msrp-200/» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « ASUS Strix Invite Shows GTX 960 Retailing for $200 MSRP in Hong Kong
ASUS Strix is holding an event in Hong Kong, called “ASUS STRIX Techday 2015″ on the 24th. While the memo for it might have seemed completely boring to some, the event date instantly prompted me to dig deeper. The event details (a copy of which can be found over at HKEPC) feature the usual marketing material and also a surprise giveaway with a blurred out picture. The most curious text lies under that, something along the lines of “the reader will be able to experience the yet unreleased Geforce GTX Graphic Card”.
I spotted something amazing today. Nvidia fans can take a deep breath now. We have received two pricing updates so far: the first one at $313 Retail and the second one at $250 Retail. Now however, we have a third (and slightly more authentic) source: ASUS Strix. Well let me get down to it then.
ASUS Strix is holding an event in Hong Kong, called “ASUS STRIX Techday 2015″ on the 24th. While the memo for it might have seemed completely boring to some, the event date instantly prompted me to dig deeper. The event details (a copy of which can be found over at HKEPC) feature the usual marketing material and also a surprise giveaway with a blurred out picture. The most curious text lies under that, something along the lines of “the reader will be able to experience the yet unreleased Geforce GTX Graphic Card”.
Oh what could this new and mysterious card worth 1560 HKD possibly be?
The fact that they mention “Geforce Graphics” as opposed to naming a card plus the blurred out picture indicates that they are obviously talking about the Geforce GTX 960. Now here’s the best part just below that the ASUS Hong Kong management has put the statement that “…have a chance to win ASUS STRIX new generation GeForce GTX graphics card valued (HK $ 1,560)”. And that, ladies and gentlemen is why you should never underestimate the Media. By simply converting 1560 Hong Kong Dollars to USD gives us the value of $200; $201.26 to be precise.
I must admit that the 128 Bit bus width of the GTX 960 alarms me. However, I also have to grudgingly admit that the apparent overclocking potential of the card is a better deal for the $200 price point (compared to $250+). The $200 price tag for the base model is what I originally estimated ofcourse, so it does come as a relief. And because there is no possible reason (that I know off) for the GTX 960 to sell below retail in Hong Kong I think we can count on this as the most accurate update, effectively locking the price of the GTX 960. The mystery of the January 22nd Event is fading fast since we know more or less know what will be revealed. Lets see if Nvidia can still pull a rabbit out their hat. This post has been edited by raydenex: Jan 18 2015, 02:09 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
raydenex
|
Jan 27 2015, 06:20 PM
|
|
Kitguru; http://www.kitguru.net/components/graphic-...wing-a-scandal/"According to a report by PCPerspective, which cites Jonah Alben, senior vice president of GPU engineering at Nvidia, the GeForce GTX 970 features 56 raster operating pipelines (ROPs) and 1792KB L2 cache, not 64 ROPs and 2MB of cache, as previously reported. In a GeForce GTX 980, each block of L2/ROPs directly communicate through a 32-bit portion of the GM204 memory interface and then to a 512MB section of on-board memory. Since the model GTX 970 lacks part of L2 and ROPs, it cannot effectively use 512MB of 4096MB of onboard GDDR5 memory." lol I believe even in GPU-Z your GTX970's show 64 ROPs yes? Nvidia did some big con job this time. This post has been edited by raydenex: Jan 27 2015, 06:23 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
raydenex
|
Jan 27 2015, 09:02 PM
|
|
QUOTE(terradrive @ Jan 27 2015, 07:08 PM) Nvidia should've sold this card with 3.5GB VRAM in the first place. The funny thing is.. they could've advertised the GTX970 with 3.5gb VRAM and people would have STILL bought it and say what a wonderful price to performance ratio the card is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
raydenex
|
Jan 27 2015, 09:07 PM
|
|
QUOTE(chocobo7779 @ Jan 27 2015, 08:17 PM) I'm pretty sure a lot of nVidia users are ready to jump ship into AMD after this scandal...  hmm bro, for many switching between red and green is a routine every few months or few years, although this time would be rather funny seeing that many reds jumped to green for the GTX970, and for the same reason/card those who are pissed may jump back to red camp. Hilarious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
raydenex
|
Feb 1 2015, 07:13 PM
|
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3MghYhf-GhULots of insight into the rise of 3dfx from the 4 founders, where/what they're doing now (1 is in Nvidia), the fall of 3dfx and what they did wrong that led to it, the purchase by Nvidia, etc. Interestingly Malaysia is singled out/mentioned at 2:23:00 when asked what was the most surprising thing these founders learned during their time at 3dfx This post has been edited by raydenex: Feb 1 2015, 07:14 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
raydenex
|
Feb 1 2015, 08:04 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Unseen83 @ Feb 1 2015, 07:51 PM) 3Ddfx Voodoo 3 2000 PCI 16mb SDRAM is my First Graphic cards... 1999/2000  During 98/99 when I was hunting for my 3dfx Banshee 16mb PCI, was already so hard to locate one as most of the stock was the AGP ver. Finally got 1 unit from a shop inside Imbi Plaza 2nd floor, can't remember the name. How was your experience? Still fondly remember that Creative Labs Banshee.. came bundled with the game Incoming. Good times.
|
|
|
|
|
|
raydenex
|
Feb 2 2015, 12:12 PM
|
|
QUOTE(targon @ Feb 2 2015, 07:25 AM) U re reminding me back to the era when Creative Labs (CL) are selling graphic cards beside their sound cards. My 1st CL card - Graphic Blaster Extreme 4Mb (Permedia 2) Then CL Graphic Blaster Riva TNT 16 Mb (yeah......the bundled Incoming game....fond memories of that) I think it was called 3D Blaster bro  Yup, they used to sell CD writer too, my 4x cdrw drive was a Creative.
|
|
|
|
|
|
raydenex
|
Feb 4 2015, 06:21 PM
|
|
QUOTE(SSJBen @ Feb 4 2015, 06:02 PM) 7-10 frames is 12% average performance difference, as you can confirm with TPU's chart (or any other chart really). Frametimes > average frames. Having 200 frames in a game means nothing when there are micro stutters that brings it down to more than half of the average frames. If the 980 is sold at the 780's price prior to launch (RM1.6k-1.8k), then it would have been a really good deal. Even the vanilla 780 launched at > 2k price point, I recall paying 2199 (or was it 2099) for the Zotac 780 reference back in 2013 (first week launch). Others brands were typically priced higher. This post has been edited by raydenex: Feb 4 2015, 06:21 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
raydenex
|
Feb 9 2015, 07:43 AM
|
|
Radeon x1300, 2005  Still kickin' when donated the desktop it was in last year. Eh.. thread lari liao.
|
|
|
|
|
|
raydenex
|
Feb 22 2015, 11:04 AM
|
|
There are multiple factors in play, some off the top of my head; 1. Architecture of the GPU 2. Memory addressing/compression techniques involved 3. Process step in semiconductor fabrication (ie 32nm, 22nm, 14nm and so forth)
So it's not as clear cut as comparing 128bit to 256bit to 384bit to 512bit etc etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
raydenex
|
Feb 22 2015, 11:43 AM
|
|
QUOTE(terradrive @ Feb 22 2015, 11:39 AM) 128, 256 bits isn't important anyways, it's the end result of memory bandwidth that's important. It's a more appropriate to compare rather than comparing what bits it have. Bear in mind I didn't mention about the GPU core yet, just comparing memory. I think you're confusing which side of the argument I'm on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
raydenex
|
Mar 12 2015, 04:07 PM
|
|
I once knew someone who gave his 1gb GDDR5 GPU (can't recall but it was most probably a HD6670) to his brother, in order to buy a GT 630 4gb gddr3 thinking he was upgrading.
So yes some people do equate vram to overall performance of card. You can imagine the laughs I had, poor guy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
raydenex
|
Mar 16 2015, 12:12 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Minecrafter @ Mar 14 2015, 06:58 PM)  Finally a card to challenge the 280X. This actually made no sense, friend. The link is about incoming 390x, totally nothing to do with 280x. Can't brain your comment. If you said finally a new Radeon flagship to replace 290x (single gpu of course) then make sense
|
|
|
|
|
|
raydenex
|
Mar 31 2015, 01:23 PM
|
|
QUOTE(X3RXUS @ Mar 31 2015, 01:16 PM) Hello all sifus, I'm planning to get Palit GT740 2GB DD5 OC graphic card to go with Asrock H97 Pro4 motherboard. I'm wondering if it is a good graphic card and how much watts I need to look for in a PSU. Your replies are very much appreciated. Would help if you let us know what exactly you expect out of the card, ie what games you intend to play and at what resolution display (1080p? 1440p? less than 1080p?) I believe a standard GT740 would be fine with a 400w PSU (minimum requirement according to Nvidia) and a single 6-pin pcie power connector. Check the product's page at Palit website to see if they provide more specific requirement for their GT740.
|
|
|
|
|
|
raydenex
|
Mar 31 2015, 04:00 PM
|
|
QUOTE(X3RXUS @ Mar 31 2015, 02:21 PM) Just some old games like Hellgate London, Crysis and Half Live 2. I set my display resolution to only 1280x960 as that is only my old crt can support. The price is just too high. My budget is below RM400.  Respect. CRT user  Yes GT740 is sufficient. A 400w psu, with at least 1 x 6-pin pcie connector. You can scour the garage sales for a used GTX750 or 750ti also which will be future proof incase you change to an LCD monitor and want to play at 1920x1080 (psu can remain at 400w here, 750/750ti usually don't even require additional 6-pin pcie power connector).
|
|
|
|
|
|
raydenex
|
Apr 14 2015, 05:53 PM
|
|
I actually stopped naively assuming high ASIC = good overclock.
Case in point, owned a reference 780 with 65% or so ASIC but it overclocked like a beast. Owned an R9 290 with 80.x% ASIC, lemon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
raydenex
|
Apr 14 2015, 11:36 PM
|
|
with memory, hasn't it been samsung > hynix > elpida recently?
the samsung mem on my gpu does 8000mhz oc'd without breaking a sweat.
|
|
|
|
|
|
raydenex
|
May 5 2015, 09:20 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Quazacolt @ May 5 2015, 08:56 PM) what kinda gpu clock/mem clock are people doing on their GTX 980 reference/bone stock cards? mine atm: https://plus.google.com/u/0/+JasonLimQuazac...578729632544643fairly new in overclocking the 980's  =edit= ok f*k it doesn't work cross threads lol Can have a look over at the unigine heaven benchmark scores thread. I got my reference 980 at 1502 core (boost) and 2000 mem. Iirc memory clock at 2000 attainable with samsung memory. *edit - just saw your post.. memory at 3501 .. okay so that's 1750.5 mhz. regardless of mem type (samsung/hynix/elpida) i think you can get a bit more aggressive on the mem OC. This post has been edited by raydenex: May 5 2015, 09:23 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
raydenex
|
Jun 9 2015, 01:11 AM
|
|
QUOTE(ngkhanmein @ Jun 8 2015, 10:34 PM) i just suggest that wait for skylake. no point go for 980Ti. Are you confusing Pascal with Skylake? Cos the dudes above are not the only ones going "eh?" at you.
|
|
|
|
|