AMD Radeon™ Discussion V12, Latest - 14.12 | WHQL - 14.12
|
|
 Jun 19 2015, 09:34 PM
Return to original view | Post
#41
|
 
Senior Member
5,211 posts Joined: Feb 2005 From: Konohana  
|
QUOTE(Unseen83 @ Jun 19 2015, 07:14 PM) well i don't want AMD to win all ... it be bad for competition.. don't forget AMD try to monopoly all CPU/GPU - Fail lol x Biggest joke of the day right there |
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 20 2015, 09:40 AM
Return to original view | Post
#42
|
|
Senior Member
5,211 posts Joined: Feb 2005 From: Konohana
|
I'm keeping my 290X after seeing the block diagram of Fury. Tessellation performance won't be that much faster than 290X, among other things. Disappointing. You can read Techreport explains it
|
|
|
Jun 20 2015, 07:40 PM
Return to original view | Post
#43
|
|
Senior Member
5,211 posts Joined: Feb 2005 From: Konohana
|
QUOTE(S4PH @ Jun 20 2015, 06:39 PM) Biggest joke of the day right there Not even slightly. You'll see. |
|
|
Jun 21 2015, 01:26 PM
Return to original view | Post
#44
|
|
Senior Member
5,211 posts Joined: Feb 2005 From: Konohana
|
QUOTE(cstkl1 @ Jun 20 2015, 11:58 PM) Never met an idiot who cling that much to his card. It's just estimation. I do more digging on it and find out it's not 100% true. Tonga GCN 1.2 does make improvement in certain areas over Hawaii GCN 1.1Another smeagol. Btw its about that johor idiot. That techreview report was insightful. Although they should put that tonga tess accelaration is a trait in the new gcn. So its not a apple to apple comparison with 290x numbers. Are those fury throughput data an estimation or facts?? The second data table. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0448sec
 0.77
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 5th December 2025 - 03:56 AM |
Quote