QUOTE(xuzen @ Feb 27 2015, 04:01 PM)
I am happy you asked and I am happy to answer:
CIMB Asia-Pac Dynamic Income Fund aka Ponzi ver 2.0 amongst long time forummers here has the best risk-adjusted return. Hence keep it.
KGF and Small-Cap are essentially invested into the same market and they both have a correlation coefficient of 0.8 which is the numerical/mathematical way of saying you are invested in the same market. 1 is the max value.
KGF's Corr-coeff vs Ponzi is 0.60 whereas Small cap Corr-coeff with Ponzi 2.0 is 0.54.
To be a logical investor, you need to choose the component of your portfolio to have low Corr-coeff with each other, hence choose small-cap with Ponzi 2.0.
Now you ask me, how I get to have access to all these data?
I told you, I have a crystal ball.
Xuzen
Wow, that's awesome, thanks for sharing your thoughts, learnt something new. So basically within a portfolio, to be considered logical, one would need low Correlation between the funds within one's own portfolio. that's a pretty awesome technical perspective there:)
Found a link for the benefit of those who would like to know more:
Link 1Link 2I'm not gonna ask where/how you get access to the data but am grateful that you're sharing your expert insight;) instead i'm gonna ask this, should one completely diversify one's portfolio completely (look at link 1's umbrella-sunscreen graph) - somehow (from a newbie point of view) it seems like the philosophy of risk mitigation by means of diversification contradicts the aggressive investor nature (assuming the investor is categorized as this). could you enlighten us on your view on this? much appreciated:)