Yes that was the idea,...but seems like got stuck for 1 hour liao.
any idea how to show the opposite?

i dont know how to put it, but i know you are very much against what i am about to say..
.... No one can time the market, so just buy at any time , any price, does not matter how many units you get?

Fo practical purposes, not academically, I feel NAV and no of units are important. They are the product what total value is.

"Cancellation off" effect (as in distribution/dividend where NAV down, No. of units up) aside, a person who gets more units for the same amount of money put into the same UT is in better position to profit.

Give RM10k to A and B - to buy the same UT.

If A managed to enter at lower NAV, he gets more units.

B enter at higher NAV, he gets less units.

When distribution time comes, A's gain will be further amplified. he will get more than B.

So in this sense, the no. of units matter. The NAV we enter too.

Created a new spreadsheet based on your advice so that I can visualize my freshly started portfolio

Bravo...soooo nice the charts.
seems like no US, Japan & Europe...need Cimb Global Titan Funds???

Haha, no bullet liao. I only dare to touch some extra funds to invest

Next bullet will be the monthly RSP, but still haven't decide on a fund yet

Wow...nice charts!

just 1 question..on the "by Country" chart
the 45% Malaysia is include both the EQ and bond?
if yes,...I think better separate as I "think" your "by country" charts is cater for EQ.
seems Malaysia % not tally between "by Types and Country" and "By Country"
I maybe wrong...have a review.
also why the vertical % lines in the "by type and Country" not tally?
ex..the FI is 41% but the vertical is about 39%

setting new benchmark!!

Let me check the autosum value and table values tomorrow

I just combined both the chart shown by you and yklooi's table posted few pages pack

haha we're in the same boat dude

From my point of view, 'A' has taken a longer investment horizon so that achieved higher gain compared to 'B' with shorter period.

It doesn't matter whether a fund distribute dividend or does not practice such distribution policy.

[attachmentid=4306805]

This post has been edited by cappuccino vs latte: Jan 19 2015, 02:03 AM

Haha.. I knew it. Another distribution discussion here...

salah Unker Looi!

ya ya

Nice efforts explaining a clearer picture of nav, no.units n distribution, a better understanding for me, i like the mooncake explanation

And market crash = Biawak shit

China market plunges. Shanghai bourse drops > 4%

URL: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2015-01-19/c...uspensions.html

Kinda agree with looi ... Its a double edged sword

Dragonland stocks have been very unpredictable and volatile lately

Nvm lar, its 3-months, 6-months and 1-year returns have been Ponzi-like

Kangarooland rallying 1%

I ask biawak shit on your mooncake

This post has been edited by Pink Spider: Jan 19 2015, 10:04 AM