u havent seen inside the bag yet

pain pain one time pay for the DX 17-55 loh. sick of waiting for tamron 17-50 liao. cannot sleep well, cannot eat well... so... go tekan ATM...

inside the bag nothing one lah, batteries a lot, manuals (ya, i always carried this, non-pro mah, always forgot wud is wud)

AF-S DX Zoom-Nikkor 17-55mm f/2.8G IF-ED

Price: RSP RM 5,788.00

fulamak

dunno i save and hungry for how long only can get tat

5788, can pay for 2 years of my daughter's nursery already.

nice capture sifoo manic... and love ur small macro studio.. thinking want to build 1 for my self...

any tip from u sifoo..?

that price is too scary lah, market price lower....


little by little, sure will reach one. i also lusting for 1.5years wud.

ehm... this one i no comment yet, tarak kids now, so can still self-fish and buy for myself at the moment...

thx for liking the studio. i will take some photo showing how the setup was done later. but then u can easily google those, tons of them in google.

Even its Canon peer, the EF 16-35mm F2.8L USM is RM4900. I asked

ehm... differ range loh...

EF 16-35 should compete with AF17-35. both for FF.

while the 17-55, canon havent come out with equal or better version yet, the 17-55 IS is few streets losing.

AF-S DX Zoom-Nikkor 17-55mm f/2.8G IF-ED

Price: RSP RM 5,788.00
Market Price: RM 4,300.00 - RM 4,400.00

See see see, Hanry sum-yok-yok already
Henry you better dun touch ler ... tele macro you also belum master, dun even think about wide angle wide aperture!

i will it when shinchan^^ bought it...
pinjam from him cukup liao

For a all-rounder wide angle zoom it's more than enough for me and L-quality is a bonus
For the time being, the EF 17-40mm F4L is my aim coz .. well ... the price is NOT so scary so it's more realistic.

This post has been edited by ac98: Nov 7 2006, 10:28 AM

17-40L is anything sharper than the 17-35L.

just that the 16-35L is 2.8 lah if u die hard. and anyway, the 17-55 is 4750 (the price i got it)

I am not a die-hard. I got for quality, but in the same time also practicality

16-35 ada quality meh? ehm... the rating of 17-40 higher
but then, many die hard 2.8, 17-40 simply F4 no stim.

so expensive???
ok i sell u 4600

My images create IMPACT, not 'STIM'. 'Stim' heats you up and cools you down, impact lasts longer.
Hence, my selection of lenses are based on this

This post has been edited by ac98: Nov 7 2006, 01:39 PM

IMPACT vs. STIM, gogogo~!

glad to hear that... thanks...