Belphegor

Has my rx100 grip arrived yet?

Technically not an Alpha family, but a distant relative.



RX100m3 with timelapse app, stretched to 30% speed. Best viewed in fullscreen 1080p

This post has been edited by lwliam: Dec 24 2014, 03:16 AM

Here's a rough breakdown. All assuming you want AF.

55/1.8 Zeiss E mount FE
50/2.0 Loxia E mount FE (edit: sorry this is manual focus)
50/1.4 A mount (Sony/Minolta) + LAEA4
50/1.7 A mount Minolta + LAEA4
50/1.4 Zeiss A mount + LAEA4/LAEA3
50/2.8 macro A mount + LAEA4

You might need to do a bit of research on their price in the open market yourself.

Anyone care to add into the list anything I might missed out?

This post has been edited by lwliam: Jan 10 2015, 08:56 PM

Sony RX100mk3 have 120p

I'm not sure what you're referring to by Sony not having 1:1 macro lenses

On the A mount, there's 30mm/2.8 macro, 50mm/2.8 macro and 100mm/2.8 macro which does 1:1

On the E mount front, there's 30mm/3.5 macro and 50mm/2.8 touit macro which also does 1:1

Mind clarifying?

This post has been edited by lwliam: Feb 4 2015, 06:59 PM

Read that review, thought you were talking about the Minolta 135/2.8 with AF, and not the Rokkor version.

Wow! So revolutionary! I'm mind blown! *sarcasmmaximus*

How light travel: in a straight line in medium of the same diffraction indices.

Wave, spectrum (technically, its not used to describe a single wavelength of light), but in your case; yes, it travels in a straight line in the same manner as above.

Theres no such thing as how many types of light, rather, how broad or which portion of the wavelength you're referring to.

But excuse me, i dont understand your last question. But if i were to answer it anyway, I'd say, zero. A camera sensor doesn't emit light, so it is not able to 'do' any light.

Rest assured, those were absolutely not copied from the internet.

This post has been edited by lwliam: Feb 16 2015, 06:46 PM

Hahahaa.. I'd like to quote someone in this situation.. Adieu..


This post has been edited by lwliam: Feb 16 2015, 07:22 PM

Good for you. Congratulations. You have broken physics. You deserve a Nobel prize.

I wonder who said not to quote the internet.. Hypocrite..

I don't think it's noise you're seeing. It should be water spritz. If it was noise, it would've appear in the darker parts of the image as well and not only at a single patch. furthermore, its shot at iso200

This post has been edited by lwliam: Feb 17 2015, 11:32 AM

Personally, I think it's overexposed and low in contrast

This post has been edited by lwliam: Feb 21 2015, 06:56 PM

Fjive

Do you have a filter attached? If you have, remove and try again.

Is the front and rear element of the lens clean? Clean any marks with lens cleaning solution.

Test with another lens to confirm this phenomenon.

DSC02699 by william leong, on Flickr

Camera Sony DSC-RX100M3 (Sorry neither E not A mount)
Exposure 0.004 sec (1/250)
Aperture f/4.0
Focal Length 25.7 mm
ISO Speed 125


DSC02673 by william leong, on Flickr

Camera Sony DSC-RX100M3
Exposure 0.017 sec (1/60)
Aperture f/4.5
Focal Length 8.8 mm
ISO Speed 125

This post has been edited by lwliam: Mar 20 2015, 01:29 AM

Thanks, but I did not intend to have everything in the frame to be sharp. I wanted the yellow arrow only as the main focal point.

This post has been edited by lwliam: Mar 23 2015, 06:54 PM

The 2470 will do well for video.. though, in tight spaces, you'd probably wish you have the 1635 instead..

Sony

SEL 24/1.8 Z

DSC03773 by william leong, on Flickr

Sony SLT-A99V
MACRO 100mm F2.8
ƒ/2.8 100.0 mm 1/100 ISO 640

This post has been edited by lwliam: Apr 23 2015, 01:28 AM