Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Why AMD Overclockers is always more than Intels?

views
     
goldfries
post Sep 22 2006, 05:19 PM

40K Club
Group Icon
Forum Admin
44,415 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




QUOTE(yetieater @ Sep 22 2006, 05:11 PM)
Exactly what I was thinking.  AMD is not a budget-CPU brand.  Its processors are still on par with similar offerings from Intel.  It's not a small company that's sweeping up the lower end of the market.
*
the Semprons were cheap. the A64s weren't cheap, especially the S939 variants.

the thing is we're talking about S64 / A64 only - but prior to that, we have the great T-bred Bs that were highly OCable too. they're cheap (i bought mine for RM 225 or so) and pair it with a nForce2 mobo with OCing features (NF7-S, 8RDA+, A7N8X, DFI LP so on so forth) and wow........ 1466mhz processor running at 2.2ghz++ or more!! biggrin.gif

Intels aren't that bad either, take the P4 2.4C on boards like IS7 / IC7 - they're nice to OC too. just that the P4 parts tend to be more pricey, so people opt for the AMDs.
goldfries
post Sep 23 2006, 12:38 PM

40K Club
Group Icon
Forum Admin
44,415 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




QUOTE(hongchiang @ Sep 23 2006, 01:38 AM)
that mean A64 is not for overclockers...
is a high performance proc is it?
*
i'm using A64 2800+ at 2.5ghz. smile.gif

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0118sec    0.22    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 5th December 2025 - 09:34 PM