If at the Bridge, he wont dare to give decisions lik yday. He'll make the decisions favorable to us. I hope. 

why he not dare since there is campaign against us? it very obvious no penalty given to hazard when spurs tackle from behind...

why he not dare since there is campaign against us? it very obvious no penalty given to hazard when spurs tackle from behind...

the campaign against us....I think that is just a smoke screen used by Mou to protect our player. Imo la.

you never know...

inb4 v bcum something big like Uefalona. lel

Gerrard announced leaving liverpool.felt sorry the him and liverpool.sad day for liverpool fan

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/...ext-season.html

Cech isn't going anywhere this Jan.

thats obviously because cech is much better.
 

http://www.express.co.uk/sport/football/54...i-Transfer-News

Its like express.co.uk read this thread.we discussed about signing varane and boomm,they said we on race to sign him

We cannot keep looking the other way where Gary Cahill and Branislav Ivanovic are concerned. Likewise, we need infinitely more from Willian and Oscar in the final third. Should the much maligned Obi Mikel play in "big" away games? We probably would not have shipped five goals, regardless of your opinion on him. Does anyone in this team know how to take a shot?

The sheer volume of goals that originate from Ivanovic’s or Cahill’s defensive channel is absurd. They do not work well as a defensive tandem and even average teams have now figured out how to exploit them. Ivanovic has the positional sense of a centre back playing as a right back. His ability to just seemingly let crosses come into the area is unparalleled. While Azpilicueta engages his opponent and invariably gets a block onto any attempted cross Ivanovic stands off, arms behind back, as his winger/full-back easily plays the ball into the area.

Ivanovic bombs forward to good effect repeatedly, but even this side of his game leaves us continually exposed. Watching him amble back as our opposition counterattack is bemusing. I can probably count on one hand the amount of good decisions he has made as an attacking player this season. His crossing is poor, despite getting himself into good positions his end product is woeful and the continual diving is an embarrassment. Given the inherent weakness in our right hand side, I am unsure why Azpilicueta has not been moved across. Yes, the Spaniard is not as dynamic as Ivanovic, but defensively he is far more robust.

Is it Ivanovic that causes Cahill to be awful or vice versa?

If Mourinho believes that there are no better options at the club than Cahill and Ivanovic we are in a bad way. Cahill is not of sufficient quality to play in a more attack minded Mourinho side. Ivanovic may improve if he is shifted across to play at centre back, but it is difficult to distinguish who or what is causing the issue on our right hand side. My personal opinion is that Cahill’s indecisiveness and reticence to step forward and challenge causes the biggest issue. Others may see Ivanovic’s wastefulness in the final third and inability to defend as more pressing issues. It may well be that getting rid of the pair of them for a short space of time will help at this point. Mourinho cannot turn a blind eye to repeat failure.

When we bought Willian I was expecting this delightfully skilful Brazilian who had torn us to pieces to compliment the artistry of Eden Hazard. The reality has been Willian developing into a well-rounded player, highly technical and a complete footballer but he has lost his attacking edge along the way. Can someone also tell the pair of them that it is okay to have a shot? Thank you.

Oscar might well be my favourite player and I would strongly argue that if we had a right winger of a similar ilk to Hazard he would knit the side together perfectly. However, both Willian and he do precisely the same job in the side. Their quick short passing, rotation and creation of angles to link play looks wonderful but there is next to no incisiveness. Where Hazard gets the ball and drives at defenders, Willian will stop play and circulate possession. Again, there is nothing wrong with ball retention but at some point you have to start doing more.

With the January window approaching I would be going all out to sign a proper winger. Having Hazard destroying teams from the left and a new right winger driving forward with the ball regularly changes the dynamic of the team. It might even prompt Ivanovic to not bomb forward as our only wide outlet. We cannot continue to try and pass our way through teams every single week. There needs to be someone else in this side with the ability to beat men, create and attack the back four.

We have spent £32m on Willian who looks to be a better central midfielder than a winger. We have spent £18m on André Schürrle who continues to go backwards with every performance.

Raheem Sterling looks like an obvious candidate, Alexis Sánchez would have been ideal, Marco Reus will be leaving Dortmund in the summer and there are a host of others who would improve us in that area.

or

The one thing I cannot quite comprehend is the lack of playing time for Loïc Rémy. The Frenchman can operate as a winger; he has pace, is powerful and would likely cause more of a threat than Willian/Schürrle/Salah.

THE HARDING PERSPECTIVE

good read
i kinda agree with the points he put up, we need a winger more than defender at the moment.

    When we bought Willian I was expecting this delightfully skilful Brazilian who had torn us to pieces to compliment the artistry of Eden Hazard. The reality has been Willian developing into a well-rounded player, highly technical and a complete footballer but he has lost his attacking edge along the way. Can someone also tell the pair of them that it is okay to have a shot? Thank you.