QUOTE(cocopuffs @ Jul 19 2016, 11:45 PM)
The property is to live in long term and not for short term investment and even though loan tenure requested is maximum years, i intend to settle before retirement age. So the banker recommended shorter mrta that doesn't cover the full loan tenure. Looking at your advices, in short the mrta is beneficial to the bank. If i choose mlta, do i have to buy it independently or can i go through the bank?
If i don't want the trouble and stick to the shorter mrta, will there be any disadvantages down the years?
Dear,
1. Based on your criteria, MLTA will be suitable to your cause.
Because
MLTA
a. will give protection to you even after your have refinance or sell of the property, the protection follows you and can transfer to another new property or old property
b. The protection coverage is level term, means if you purchase protection of RM500,000 after 35 years time, the protection will still be the same amount
c. Purchasing MLTA through outside bank offer, your family will receive the cash when anything happen to you (Death, TPD and Critical illness), they can chose to settle the property loan or for their own use
d. Protection can be more than the loan tenure of your property, meaning to say >35 years
However, it's pricier than MRTA
MLTA through bank
a. Anything happen to you, bank will use the sum assured to settle the housing loan first before disburse the money to you
b. the protection are limited to your housing loan loan tenure, means it is not unlimited and it is not transferable
c. customization space are limited for mlta through bank
2. However, MRTA shouldn't be removed from the picture
a. It's cheaper compare to MLTA, thereby it comes with the shortllife features that doesn't benefit you in long term
b. buying 35 years cost isn't too high, whereby if you wish to budget your cash flow, hence MRTA will be a good option
However, the shortfall is
a. can't transfer to another property (indirectly saying)
b. will settle the housing loan first before disbursing the cash to y our family
c. the protection is reduced through yearss and yearss.
d. the protection wouldn't be able to cover the outstanding loan balance if ever the interest rate rises too high 8-10%!
e. Anything happen to you after that, the ownership transfer will be quite troublesome, it will take maybe years. Because the process of transfer of ownership after your death will thorugh amanah rakyat and high court, it will take a long time.
Well, you can see there's pros and cons for both product, do study wisely and chose the right product for your objectives.
3. MLTA can be purchase independently through Mortgage consultant
CODE
MRTA
1. REDUCING protection, when interest rate rise, the protection will be reduced and couldn't covered the total loan amount.
2. when you sell or refinance your property, MRTA policy will lapse. You will need to purchase a new one whereby factor in your current age, it will be even more expensive
3. It's only beneficial to the bank
4. Interest will be charged when finance into the loan amount
5. There's a time frame for the amount to be claimed when (death/TPD) occured. 2-4 years. With will writing 2-3 years.
MLTA
1. it is a term protection. Rm500k protection, after 35 years will still be Rm500k
2. When sell or refinance your proeprty, MLTA wouldn't lapse and will still be active.
3. It's beneficial to you
4. There's Hot cash receivable when you lapse the policy. Around 20 years, your cash value receivable will breakeven with total premium paid.
5. Death or TPD occured, it will take 7-30 days to receive the death benefit cash value
Cheers