Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Autodesk Programs Worth RM30-40k Is Now Available, For Free To Malaysian Students

views
     
azarimy
post Dec 10 2014, 10:00 PM

mister architect: the arrogant pr*ck
Group Icon
Elite
10,672 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: shah alam - skudai - shah alam


QUOTE(Elgore @ Dec 10 2014, 01:40 PM)
pen pencil quite obsolete
now just draw from basic CAD software
BIM still new here i guess

i dunno about BIM but interested to know more biggrin.gif

the future definitely moving towards BIM but feels slow here
hack even lots of people arent even aware of BIM
*
Most big architecture firms in malaysia and those with partners in singapore are already using BIM since the last 5 years. DBKL and JKR now have their own BIM group who're responsible to push the industry to adopt BIM, but they're still new.

UTM architecture programme fully equips students with BIM authoring skills using revit with climatic simulations. Some of the big architecture schools are also adopting revit as well.

Im a Revit instructor and was responsible of implementing BIM syllabus into the architecture curriculum.
azarimy
post Dec 10 2014, 10:06 PM

mister architect: the arrogant pr*ck
Group Icon
Elite
10,672 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: shah alam - skudai - shah alam


QUOTE(Elgore @ Dec 10 2014, 02:02 PM)
rclxms.gif nice

tho next time i cari makan susah d since i dunno BIM  sweat.gif
*
Most people with 3d background find revit a bit harder to learn. But i attribute it to their perspective of treating it like another 3D modelling software. It's not.

So for those without 3D background, i recommend learnin this straightaway and skip sketchup!
azarimy
post Dec 10 2014, 10:17 PM

mister architect: the arrogant pr*ck
Group Icon
Elite
10,672 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: shah alam - skudai - shah alam


QUOTE(Elgore @ Dec 10 2014, 02:12 PM)
what about from CAD 2D background and 3dMax user?  hmm.gif
*
how extensive is ur 3d background? basic 3D will help u understand the model. but the biggest difference is the workflow. revit is very profession-centric. meaning revit architecture is tuned to how architects work, while revit structure is tuned to structural engineers. if u're neither of those, then working in that environment can be counter-intuitive. i tried learning revit MEP, but i just dont understand why this has to come after that and not before, because that's how mechanical engineers sort out their business.

everybody will work in 3D. but the workflow is unique to their profession.
azarimy
post Dec 10 2014, 10:25 PM

mister architect: the arrogant pr*ck
Group Icon
Elite
10,672 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: shah alam - skudai - shah alam


QUOTE(WindDragon @ Dec 10 2014, 02:17 PM)
Some architects in malaysia use Revit because their Singapore consultants use Revit, but I won't call it BIM. U can have your 4D,5D or even 6D revit model but if the Developers and Main Contractors are not practising BIM, then the model is useless or what I call a very expensive clash detection model haha.

One of the reason why only 1 company in malaysia successfully implement BIM. Because the main con, architect, MEP engineer, structural engineer all under 1 umbrella company.
*
agreed. our main weakness as compared to singapore is BIM in malaysia is not coming from the top. in singapore, they made it the industry regulation to use BIM for all projects, and those without it will greatly suffer.

so far most firms i visited as part of students' industrial placement use revit as BIM authoring only, but not much else beyond that. even that is quite beneficial to the offices, as an architect can now work with less technical assistants, which means less people on the payroll yet the yield is higher as a project can be completed in less time.

i used to work freelance in a small group for 2 years, and it was pretty hectic, i had to drop it. but now i'm picking it up again, with a bungalow-sized projects done alone in a matter of days rather than weeks.
azarimy
post Dec 10 2014, 10:25 PM

mister architect: the arrogant pr*ck
Group Icon
Elite
10,672 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: shah alam - skudai - shah alam


QUOTE(Elgore @ Dec 10 2014, 02:22 PM)
0 in autocad 3d  sweat.gif
basic to intermediate in 3dmax
0 in sketchup  sweat.gif
*
oklah tu. go try revit.
azarimy
post Dec 10 2014, 10:38 PM

mister architect: the arrogant pr*ck
Group Icon
Elite
10,672 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: shah alam - skudai - shah alam


QUOTE(WindDragon @ Dec 10 2014, 02:36 PM)
Same situation over at my side. Architects mostly use it for clash detection only. That's like 10% of what BIM is capable of.

Ehhhhh. Other countries those with BIM knowledge are earning big bucks but in Malaysia this skill set is like worthless haha.
*
well, being revit instructor pays quite well, so i'm not complaining tongue.gif
azarimy
post Dec 10 2014, 10:39 PM

mister architect: the arrogant pr*ck
Group Icon
Elite
10,672 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: shah alam - skudai - shah alam


QUOTE(WindDragon @ Dec 10 2014, 02:30 PM)
Revit is for creating a BIM model, revit is NOT a 3d modeling tool. You can do 3d models in AutoCAD.

When using revit, you are actually building the building inside the computer. The components of the building have its own properties. Like the wall has wall properties, the windows have window properties.

In AutoCAD u can draw a square and that square and be a wall or a floor or a window, but in revit you have to define what is that square.
*
i was explaining to him how people with prominent 3D background finds revit harder to learn as compared to those who dont. this is due to their comfort and familiarity of the other 3D modelling software, particularly sketchup.

Bump Topic Add ReplyOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0171sec    0.93    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 13th December 2025 - 09:40 PM