Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

81 Pages « < 2 3 4 5 6 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 AMD K8 Family Overclocking (754/939/940/AM2/1207), General discussions and newbies' guide

views
     
Ash
post Jan 12 2006, 02:36 AM

Legend
******
Senior Member
1,697 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: KL




whats the difference between e3 and e6?
Westley
post Jan 12 2006, 08:39 AM

Night Crawler...
****
Store Representative
679 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PG/KL/CYBERJAYA



this might be showed that amd is slowly migrate to a new platform.
to focus more on new technology and production, they reduce the cost by produce old chip using 1 solution and design.

so no matter wat, it is still e4 for all...
emilz
post Jan 12 2006, 05:29 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,377 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Nothing special


any information
sidewinderz
post Jan 12 2006, 05:37 PM

Long Live UV!!!
*******
Senior Member
3,966 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur



winchester core...old core...does not oc as good as the current batch of venice processors...should be able to hit bout 2.7ghz on this processor at max...btw, dun create a thread la...post it in other threads..you really want mod to close this thread duntcha? laugh.gif
emilz
post Jan 12 2006, 05:48 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,377 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Nothing special


QUOTE(sidewinderz @ Jan 12 2006, 05:37 PM)
winchester core...old core...does not oc as good as the current batch of venice processors...should be able to hit bout 2.7ghz on this processor at max...btw, dun create a thread la...post it in other threads..you really want mod to close this thread duntcha? laugh.gif
*
that means i got the old processor laa
sial la tuu
bought just 6 month ago

winc87
post Jan 12 2006, 05:51 PM

w|Nc
******
Senior Member
1,621 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Seremban



FYI, the venice is the first to have SSE3 support.

This post has been edited by winc87: Jan 12 2006, 09:46 PM
sidewinderz
post Jan 12 2006, 05:51 PM

Long Live UV!!!
*******
Senior Member
3,966 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur



hehe...new processors are all codenamed "venice" with revision of either E3, E4 or E6..hehehe..sorry dude...gotta read up before buying ma..laugh.gif anyway, its still good that you got yourself AMD instead of intel... cool.gif

This post has been edited by sidewinderz: Jan 12 2006, 05:52 PM
emilz
post Jan 12 2006, 05:57 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,377 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Nothing special


QUOTE(sidewinderz @ Jan 12 2006, 05:51 PM)
hehe...new processors are all codenamed "venice" with revision of either E3, E4 or E6..hehehe..sorry dude...gotta read up before buying ma..laugh.gif anyway, its still good that you got yourself AMD instead of intel... cool.gif
*
ya loo
but i fell the different between my 3200 and my friend 3000 venice
instead of overcloking, and in normal condition mine was lake a bit
sidewinderz
post Jan 12 2006, 06:04 PM

Long Live UV!!!
*******
Senior Member
3,966 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur



QUOTE(emilz @ Jan 12 2006, 05:57 PM)
ya loo
but i fell the different between my 3200 and my friend 3000 venice
instead of overcloking, and in normal condition mine was lake a bit
*
nah...that is wat you feel...actually its based on lots of factors...the mobo, ram and hard disk that both of you uses will yield slightly different performance...overall, your processor should be as good as the venice, the only drawback is that your Vcore runs slightly higher at stock as compared to venice....1.45v as compared to 1.4v....although at stock speeds, both does not have major difference in heat..but once OC, you'll know wat i meant..hehehe...

oh..another difference would be that venice supports SSE3 instructions whereas your processor doesn't....

This post has been edited by sidewinderz: Jan 12 2006, 06:04 PM
emilz
post Jan 12 2006, 06:07 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,377 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Nothing special


QUOTE(sidewinderz @ Jan 12 2006, 06:04 PM)
nah...that is wat you feel...actually its based on lots of factors...the mobo, ram and hard  disk that both of you uses will yield slightly different performance...overall, your processor should be as good as the venice, the only drawback is that your Vcore runs slightly higher at stock as compared to venice....1.45v as compared to 1.4v....although at stock speeds, both does not have major difference in heat..but once OC, you'll know wat i meant..hehehe...

oh..another difference would be that venice supports SSE3 instructions whereas your processor doesn't....
*
compare to ram mine more better 160 sata 2 1g corsair ram
he oso used abit but not fatality 512 ram kingston

sidewinderz
post Jan 12 2006, 06:10 PM

Long Live UV!!!
*******
Senior Member
3,966 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur



QUOTE(emilz @ Jan 12 2006, 06:07 PM)
compare to ram mine more better 160 sata 2 1g corsair ram
he oso used abit but not fatality 512 ram kingston
*
haha....how bout fragmentation of the OS and applications installed and running in the background? hehe...dun forget bout that...dun worry so much...wat matters most is that whether you can achieve high clockspeeds when you OC it.. cool.gif
KilJim
post Jan 12 2006, 09:29 PM

^-_-^ ZzzZzZzZzzz....
Group Icon
Elite
4,424 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Singapore



QUOTE(winc87 @ Jan 12 2006, 05:51 PM)
FYI, the venice E6 is the first to have SSE3 support.
*
weird, my CPU-Z says my E3 supports SSE3 too, is that a bug? blink.gif

btw, since i'm too damn lazy to read up tongue.gif is there any real advantage of SSE3?

winc87
post Jan 12 2006, 09:48 PM

w|Nc
******
Senior Member
1,621 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Seremban



hehehe, Venice is the first to have SSE3. I also do not know i typed E6, sorry for my mistake. tongue.gif
antonio
post Jan 13 2006, 08:13 PM

AMD Phenom II & Intel i7 Overclocker
Group Icon
VIP
4,032 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: MSR Headquaters
SSE3 can count faster on math calculation i guess....
winc87
post Jan 13 2006, 08:26 PM

w|Nc
******
Senior Member
1,621 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Seremban



It's not faster but to make it easier for programmer to do their jobs.
antonio
post Jan 13 2006, 08:34 PM

AMD Phenom II & Intel i7 Overclocker
Group Icon
VIP
4,032 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: MSR Headquaters
QUOTE(winc87 @ Jan 13 2006, 08:26 PM)
It's not faster but to make it easier for programmer to do their jobs.
*
easier=faster lar...tak same erk??? thumbup.gif

winc87
post Jan 13 2006, 08:47 PM

w|Nc
******
Senior Member
1,621 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Seremban



hehehe...if you learn assembly language then you will know what i mean. It is easier for programmer to do a calculation by calling the instructions from SSE3.
antonio
post Jan 13 2006, 09:09 PM

AMD Phenom II & Intel i7 Overclocker
Group Icon
VIP
4,032 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: MSR Headquaters
whats assembly lingue???i do know Lingo,actionscript,a lil bit of VB, and a lot of Sandra,memtest,prime95 tongue.gif
newbieockids
post Jan 13 2006, 10:16 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,405 posts

Joined: Jun 2005



QUOTE(antonio_zth @ Jan 13 2006, 09:09 PM)
whats assembly lingue???i do know Lingo,actionscript,a lil bit of VB, and a lot of Sandra,memtest,prime95 tongue.gif
damn i hate assembly language so much.. failed my 8085 assembly language paper once b4.. tongue.gif

This post has been edited by newbieockids: Jan 13 2006, 10:16 PM
youngmasterho
post Jan 17 2006, 10:55 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
335 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
with my PC spec in my signature... i tried to overclock to reach 1.9+GHz while keeping at 210Hz FSB... dun dare to increase further becoz i was told it will burn d mobo... my CPU voltage is less than 1.4v, northbridge voltage is default

i dun hav a good CPU cooling system....

sifu sekalian, wat would b d max overclock speed will i achieve? thx a lot.

This post has been edited by youngmasterho: Jan 17 2006, 10:58 AM

81 Pages « < 2 3 4 5 6 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0166sec    0.47    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 7th December 2025 - 09:01 AM