QUOTE(-vip3rleon9- @ Dec 28 2006, 11:57 PM)
Nope, dont worry. 2.9v is still in the safe zone for passive cooling.QUOTE(toughnut @ Dec 29 2006, 09:17 AM)
@-vip3rleon9-
try 3-3-3-8 and 2.7v first. if still cannot,try upping the Vdimm. my silly twin stick of rebranded ddr333 KVR can easily do ddr480 at 3-4-4-8-2T 2.9v (didn't dare go higher
)
Its better to try 2.5-4-4-8 before 3-3-3-8 because the difference in the Cas Latency makes more different than those two in the middle.try 3-3-3-8 and 2.7v first. if still cannot,try upping the Vdimm. my silly twin stick of rebranded ddr333 KVR can easily do ddr480 at 3-4-4-8-2T 2.9v (didn't dare go higher
QUOTE(-vip3rleon9- @ Dec 29 2006, 05:23 PM)
so far i'm running 2.5-3-3-8 @ default V @ DDR470. 
i'll try using this timings and OC till DDR480 or even maybe DDR500 on 2.9V.
Some chips can go and some cant depends on the chips itself. So try and experiment yourself. i'll try using this timings and OC till DDR480 or even maybe DDR500 on 2.9V.
QUOTE(mazdagtr210 @ Dec 29 2006, 09:04 PM)
no need to oc ur ram la.. used timing enought edi maaa... see ur proc first before ur fried ur ram lorrrr
Higher ram frequency with loose timing is better than slower ram frequency with tight timing.
Dec 31 2006, 10:05 PM

Quote



0.0293sec
0.54
7 queries
GZIP Disabled