Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

66 Pages « < 2 3 4 5 6 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Marantz Club - Because Music Matters~, Do share your marantz stories

views
     
sonerin
post Jan 2 2015, 09:09 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(chanhin @ Jan 2 2015, 09:01 PM)
I am using external DAC for USB purposes...

This is the only disappointment from PM6005 -> lack of USB
*
That is maybe a better choice. There are a lot external DAC that is better than internal dac
wim1983
post Jan 2 2015, 09:21 PM

Whiz
******
Senior Member
1,531 posts

Joined: Oct 2010


QUOTE(sonerin @ Jan 2 2015, 09:02 PM)
How you connect?  You using the internal dac?
*
I just use ODAC for the moment, no choice, I need more money if want to play with the Marantz DAC shakehead.gif
sonerin
post Jan 2 2015, 10:06 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
If you really going to use dac is better to go for external dac
fx20
post Jan 2 2015, 10:31 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
817 posts

Joined: Feb 2010
The ODAC will sound more transparent than the Cirrus Logic CS4398.
butt
post Jan 2 2015, 10:48 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
119 posts

Joined: Dec 2007


All Cirrus Logic CS4398 based chip or any particular model?
I personally think chip is only part of associated component before the final product, in which a good implementation of the chip will make a difference.

This post has been edited by butt: Jan 2 2015, 11:01 PM
bad2928
post Jan 2 2015, 10:53 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
628 posts

Joined: Apr 2010


QUOTE(fx20 @ Jan 2 2015, 10:31 PM)
The ODAC will sound more transparent than the Cirrus Logic CS4398.
*
sorry for off topic,how about cirrus logic cs4398 compare to ess sabre (ES9016S)?
TSchanhin
post Jan 2 2015, 11:29 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,615 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
QUOTE(butt @ Jan 2 2015, 10:48 PM)
All Cirrus Logic CS4398 based chip or any particular model?
I personally think chip is only part of associated component before the final product, in which a good implementation of the chip will make a difference.
*
100% agreed here.
Comparison across chipset only valid when all parties are designing based on top notch quality circuit.

Btw, do you guys feel that Saber 9018 sound a bit fake with too much 'details'? I mean not natural and might be an issue for pro-long listening experiences.

This post has been edited by chanhin: Jan 2 2015, 11:30 PM
ktek
post Jan 3 2015, 01:09 AM

小喇叭
********
All Stars
13,197 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
QUOTE(chanhin @ Jan 2 2015, 11:29 PM)
100% agreed here.
Comparison across chipset only valid when all parties are designing based on top notch quality circuit.

Btw, do you guys feel that Saber 9018 sound a bit fake with too much 'details'? I mean not natural and might be an issue for pro-long listening experiences.
*
try not using the highest rate like 192khz. too balance and flat tone, no emotion.
it will makes some changes to overall natural tone
fx20
post Jan 3 2015, 06:56 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
817 posts

Joined: Feb 2010
QUOTE(chanhin @ Jan 2 2015, 11:29 PM)
100% agreed here.
Comparison across chipset only valid when all parties are designing based on top notch quality circuit.

Btw, do you guys feel that Saber 9018 sound a bit fake with too much 'details'? I mean not natural and might be an issue for pro-long listening experiences.
*
It is about pairing. The sabre is rather transparent and you need to part it with right gears to get its best. If you felt fatigue after long listening, the culprit is probably your speaker.

BTW, the differences in DACs is not significant from 1 to another. They are audible only if you do side-side comparison.
fx20
post Jan 3 2015, 07:01 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
817 posts

Joined: Feb 2010
QUOTE(butt @ Jan 2 2015, 10:48 PM)
All Cirrus Logic CS4398 based chip or any particular model?
I personally think chip is only part of associated component before the final product, in which a good implementation of the chip will make a difference.
*
DAC in 6005.
The ODAC is designed by NwAvGuy and Yoyodyne Consulting and it is meant to be flat and balanced. Some find it too dull for music, but it can be a real gem if you can pair it correctly with a transparent speaker.
fx20
post Jan 3 2015, 07:03 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
817 posts

Joined: Feb 2010
QUOTE(ktek @ Jan 3 2015, 01:09 AM)
try not using the highest rate like 192khz. too balance and flat tone, no emotion.
it will makes some changes to overall natural tone
*
I dont get your point.
sonerin
post Jan 3 2015, 07:10 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,739 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(fx20 @ Jan 3 2015, 06:56 AM)
It is about pairing. The sabre is rather transparent and you need to part it with right gears to get its best. If you felt fatigue after long listening, the culprit is  probably your speaker.

BTW, the differences in DACs is not significant from 1 to another. They are audible only if you do side-side comparison.
*
Agree. Without proper pairing is pointless
wim1983
post Jan 3 2015, 03:27 PM

Whiz
******
Senior Member
1,531 posts

Joined: Oct 2010


QUOTE(sonerin @ Dec 31 2014, 03:44 PM)
Sorry to hijack this thread but I am curious to ask, why need to warm up first before it can shine ? Pm6005 is a solid amp right ? I thought only tube need warm up. Please correct me if I am wrong.
*
I think is break in, when playing music in brand new state, I feel the bass a bit too strong, now I feel that the bass just nice after few days playback, whether it can be better will have to keep track 1st thumbup.gif
wim1983
post Jan 3 2015, 03:30 PM

Whiz
******
Senior Member
1,531 posts

Joined: Oct 2010


QUOTE(ktek @ Jan 3 2015, 02:09 AM)
try not using the highest rate like 192khz. too balance and flat tone, no emotion.
it will makes some changes to overall natural tone
*
Actually, there is an article try to prove that playing music in 24bits 192khz is meaningless, hmm interesting.. hmm.gif
TSchanhin
post Jan 3 2015, 03:44 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,615 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
QUOTE(wim1983 @ Jan 3 2015, 03:30 PM)
Actually, there is an article try to prove that playing music in 24bits 192khz is meaningless, hmm interesting.. hmm.gif
*
Not sure on stereo.

But I can clearly hear the differences between DTS and DTS HD as well as Dobly vs Dobly HD. The differences are only on the details.. All their volume are same on respective audio tracks.
wim1983
post Jan 4 2015, 01:33 AM

Whiz
******
Senior Member
1,531 posts

Joined: Oct 2010


QUOTE(chanhin @ Jan 3 2015, 04:44 PM)
Not sure on stereo.

But I can clearly hear the differences between DTS and DTS HD as well as Dobly vs Dobly HD. The differences are only on the details.. All their volume are same on respective audio tracks.
*
What you mean is audio track like 5.1/7.1 right? hmm.gif
fx20
post Jan 4 2015, 08:58 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
817 posts

Joined: Feb 2010
QUOTE(wim1983 @ Jan 4 2015, 01:33 AM)
What you mean is audio track like 5.1/7.1 right? hmm.gif
*
He meant 16/48 vs 24/96
ktek
post Jan 8 2015, 11:42 PM

小喇叭
********
All Stars
13,197 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
mini cd receiver MCR503, just got it back from lending a friend.
user posted image
SUSsupersound
post Jan 8 2015, 11:52 PM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
11,554 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
Owner of SR5007 reporting in.
Topet
post Jan 9 2015, 08:42 AM

schadenfreude
*****
Senior Member
994 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
From: Sabah


want to change my avr to 6007 or 6008 but i think i'll stick with my LX 56 at the moment...

66 Pages « < 2 3 4 5 6 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0263sec    0.37    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 7th December 2025 - 11:46 AM