QUOTE(peter_pj @ Nov 9 2008, 02:14 PM)
Hmm, then I might know you as well
Haha!. I see. How long were you in PwC?
QUOTE(peter_pj @ Nov 9 2008, 02:14 PM)
I agree with this fact...in fact I know the methodologies team as well (though I am not from audit background). The bad thing about pwc's good methodologies would be the staff need to do more and more sampling, lol
True, but we've greatly toned down the need for substantive TODs in recent times. Then again, it all depends on the sectors that you're in. I hardly do much of substantive TODs anyway

but the fact on other Big4's metholdologies that I've seen so far.. hmm, that's another story
QUOTE(peter_pj @ Nov 9 2008, 02:14 PM)
100% true. I was in PwC and now with EY and I totally can feel the difference in culture. In pwc, the people are kiasu and work environment is very tense - the annual GWP surveys already prove this fact. But EY on the other hand has friendlier staff and people are more approachable within the department (whether senior or junior) and across all the LOS and groups.
I think you meant, GPW

Anyhow I can't comment much on the other Big4 working culture 'cos you'll have the easy and hard times. IMHO, I don't think that my dept's all that tense and kiasu (it's prolly others then). So far my friends who have moved on within the Big4 says their experience in other firms are
different. Just takes awhile to get used to it.
QUOTE(peter_pj @ Nov 9 2008, 02:14 PM)
It's true about it being 'messy' which is probably because the department is desperately understaffed...but don't believe the held back from promotion bit is true. Anyway, on the plus side - it would be a great way for you to learn a wider scope of the job and be a lot more independent compared to staff from departments
What Peter said is true. If you're due for promotion, there isn't a slightest reason why they should hold you back. If you don't get it, heck.. join the other Big4..they'll definitely take you in