QUOTE(etigge @ Jul 14 2015, 03:54 PM)
If the rims were shodded with the same tires, I say the difference is minimal. for 22inch or 451 , the tire choice is limited to thinner tires only, the widest is 1.3 inch. the wider the tires, the more resistance, meaning it needs more effort to pedal, especially uphill. But on the other side of the coin, smaller diameter makes pedaling easier. So, there are pros and cons. So this means it is actually easier to pedal a 20 inch foldie than a 22 inch unit. Why don't you change the existing tires with smaller width tires, like the Kenda Kontender. It will ease the pedaling but it will be bumpy as narrower tires needs more air pressure and will be hard on your bump.
Changing to bigger rims makes pedaling harder, Adding another chainring will definitely help. This will add more lower gears, thus making pedaling much easier BUT it will be slower. Riding uphill needs practice and you need to build your stamina over time. You did not mention what kind of bike nor what size the front chain ring is. It will be easier to suggest if you did. Check the number of teeths your chainring have, if it has 53 or 52, you can change to 48 teeth unit and this might help.
Summary
smaller diameter rims easier to pedal than bigger
narrower tire width easier to pedal but harsh ride because high pressure
the more gears you have, gets more choice on ratios, more lower gears means each gear drop, gets easier and easier to pedal but slower speed.
The wheels are (20"x1 3/8) is 451 right? The chainring is 52T with 7 speed cog. I'm fine with the setup but my gf kaki lembik a bit so was considering on her bicycle.
I have thought of upgrading her bike to 2x chainring, but with the additional new chainring+FD+shifter it may already cost a few hundred $ so might as well to consider a new bicycle. It is a basic folding bike and cost about RM400+ a bike. The reason we bought it, is in case she might lose interest in cycling but seems like she haven't faded yet so i guess is good news la. For almost a year of cycling, we have packed our foldies in car and went cycling at different states but we try to choose places with less hilly area.
I thought that bigger wheels = better efficiency to cycle since a stroke of pedal will turn the wheel further compared to smaller wheel. That is why i was curious about the difference in wheel diameter. If smaller wheel is easier to cycle, a 16" will be more suitable? Will she look like a hamster pedaling uphill? On flat road with current bike she can maintain around 15+kph comfortably and I observed that she was usually using the 5th gear (3rd ring from the smallest cog) at this speed.
That is why i was curious about the difference in wheel diameter and which one is the better alternative to consider for choosing a new bike for her.
This post has been edited by edmundcwh: Jul 14 2015, 05:49 PM