Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Maxis The Official LYN Maxis Wireless (3G/3.5G) Thread, Now it comes with soap !
|
prasys
|
Oct 2 2007, 09:26 PM
|
Heros Never Die
|
 They call this upgrading. I dont know whats going on with them. It seems that they dont a give a damn on their old customers. I use to get very good speeds and now this. Phew....I am going to call them and tell them that I'm just going to pay 10% of it. Cause i am getting 10% of the advertised speed
|
|
|
|
|
|
prasys
|
Oct 2 2007, 09:32 PM
|
Heros Never Die
|
Great , they are cheating old users. Nice job maxis. It seems that they love new users very much. Typical maxis trick (as I expected)...Keep up the good job. What excuse are you going to give
Oh THEY STILL DO NOT ADMIT THEIR FAULT. Their customer support staff does not even know what is going on. Oh god...Now I am starting to rant. Give me 700Kbps++ for local link and I'll keep quiet. Seriously , I am not asking 3.6Mbps..Just 700Kbps is enough for me (local link)
|
|
|
|
|
|
prasys
|
Oct 2 2007, 09:46 PM
|
Heros Never Die
|
Celcom has few other major disadvantages compared to Maxis and the best part is that they use this IP '219.93.152.3' <-- please go and check as it will be your IP wherever you go http://www.google.com/search?q=219.93.152.3On top of that , its been blocked by Project Honeymoon for its spamming. So In other words , One Malaysia (aka Whole of Celcom Broadband users are tied behind one single IP. If some idiot continues to abuse the service , the rest has to suffer). On the other hand , maxis assigns each unique individual IP for every customer (which has an advantage , compared to Celcom). There you go. You be the judge I rather suffer with slow speed (like I did with JARING) rather then to be tied up in One big mumbo jumbo Shared IP Connection. http://www.projecthoneypot.org/i_efaeb8253...f415d039a505043No no no no , I am not Promoting Maxis nor I am pro-Maxis This post has been edited by prasys: Oct 2 2007, 09:48 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
prasys
|
Oct 2 2007, 09:57 PM
|
Heros Never Die
|
But then you will face a problem. If your IP Address is blocked. You will have a problem such as certain MMORPG , Games and certain application that does not allow you to have more then 1 concurrent connections. But then if you are just using it for surfing , its not a problem. There is a problem there. I've just found out that Celcom has not really secured their proxy server and its currently blacklisted by few Spambots etc. So there is a problem there. I hope Celcom looks into that matter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
prasys
|
Oct 2 2007, 10:10 PM
|
Heros Never Die
|
Thats great. Its because TM has a large backbone. Sadly , they still dont assign each individual address for Celcom Broadband users. Other then that , it seems to be a good alternative to maxis
|
|
|
|
|
|
prasys
|
Oct 3 2007, 02:28 PM
|
Heros Never Die
|
The speed during the wee hours of morning is pretty fast. But then I don't use the Internet during the daytime as I've to attend college. So its pretty useless. During the nightime , when i really need it..bam it does not work
|
|
|
|
|
|
prasys
|
Oct 4 2007, 03:29 PM
|
Heros Never Die
|
I have no comment at all. I am not sure why its that slow...Man I feel cheated now. Oh by the way , the latency is pretty good on the other hand...At least I managed to play DOTA...with minor lags. Its just that the speed sucks (even for local link now)
|
|
|
|
|
|
prasys
|
Oct 5 2007, 11:22 AM
|
Heros Never Die
|
This is a joke. Stay away from Maxis (if possible). My friend came over (he is a maxis wireless user as well and he is using that tiny USB Modem {I call it handy}]. We compared our speeds. Hes speed is way better then mine ( He just registered yesterday) and I'm speechless. Seriously , I have no word. He might be coming to my place today or tomorrow and I am going to test out his modem on my PC. If I am getting around the same speed as his...Then I think I know that maxis is trying to 'dump' the old users. Its just a hypothesis guys..I could be wrong as well
|
|
|
|
|
|
prasys
|
Oct 5 2007, 12:56 PM
|
Heros Never Die
|
Yeah but then its for few seconds. I don't even want 3.6Mbps. I am very happy if they cna provide me a stable and consistent 400-700Kbps local connection. I am happy. But this is insane...I am not looking for 4Mbps download. I just want a consistent download. I really enjoyed during the cooling off period but then it seems to be going down the hill
|
|
|
|
|
|
prasys
|
Oct 6 2007, 10:11 PM
|
Heros Never Die
|
Hint : Use google !
Anway
3G - UMTS (aka old tech) - speeds up to 384Kbps only (both up and down) 3.5G - HSDPA (improved Old thing) that delivers a faster downlink rate. Supports up to 14.4Mbps
HSDPA also provides a lower latency to the users as opposed to UMTS. There are many advantages of using HSDPA over UMTS. But both of them are in the same family.
|
|
|
|
|
|
prasys
|
Oct 7 2007, 08:20 AM
|
Heros Never Die
|
Maxis is crawling the whole day. Upgrade process ? downgrading process...I dont know
But then , when I surf the Internet using my maxis postpaid (aka with maxis APN). The Internet is fast...
|
|
|
|
|
|
prasys
|
Oct 7 2007, 03:20 PM
|
Heros Never Die
|
Dude let me tell you this
If you are into P2P..Just forget it. Just forget it. Its just nice for light surfing only and playing some cheap web-based MMORPG Games or running around in RO World. If you try to download during daytime , your download will be uber slow or it will say can't find tracker. It will just spit some random error message.
Maxis' speed suck by the way. Just to let you know , you'll regret. Better test it first before saying yes. How fast you say. Its up to 3.6Mbps. Can you get 3.6Mbps. Thats a yes and a no question. the peak is at least ~2.8Mbps (cause you need to minus all the overheads and other factors). I think you can't get more then 2Mbps at this moment. So yeah , speed varies
|
|
|
|
|
|
prasys
|
Oct 7 2007, 09:49 PM
|
Heros Never Die
|
Calm down ?..LYN loads ages and my signal is good...What more do they want ?...Seriously , maxis come and fix it and PLEASE PUT in your site that YOU ARE FIXING. I love JARING for one thing , they put everything in advanced and their technical team are soo organised.
I am going to ditch this very soon...and who knows..try izzi for a change..Maybe not..Well...I'll wait and see
Oh by the way your latency is also very poor. The latency should be ~100ms-200ms for HSDPA (for local links). Beyond that shows that your coverage zone is poor or Maxis is doing something. In this case , maxis is doing somethign or they can't able to cater enough users.
|
|
|
|
|
|
prasys
|
Oct 8 2007, 07:36 PM
|
Heros Never Die
|
I dont know how come you are getting 80kBps..But the speeds are extermely slow..when i say slow , I mean its really slow
|
|
|
|
|
|
prasys
|
Oct 8 2007, 08:18 PM
|
Heros Never Die
|
Could you do me a favour. Shut down all torrent application Then do a traceroute to www.lowyat.net QUOTE traceroute to www.jaring.my (61.6.32.105), 64 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 4.051 ms 3.450 ms 3.407 ms 2 192.168.0.1 (192.168.0.1) 5.301 ms 4.989 ms 4.541 ms 3 10.213.251.131 (10.213.251.131) 98.575 ms 87.621 ms 99.934 ms Okay on your 3rd hop , could you kindly ping the IP Address for 100 packets. I want to see whats the response like. Thats the tower , I want to see if its the problem with my cell tower or with maxis. Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
|
prasys
|
Oct 8 2007, 09:00 PM
|
Heros Never Die
|
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « PING 10.213.251.131 (10.213.251.131): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=0 ttl=252 time=88.805 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=1 ttl=252 time=88.550 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=2 ttl=252 time=98.571 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=3 ttl=252 time=78.500 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=4 ttl=252 time=98.441 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=5 ttl=252 time=88.492 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=6 ttl=252 time=88.361 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=7 ttl=252 time=98.366 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=8 ttl=252 time=98.350 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=9 ttl=252 time=108.322 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=10 ttl=252 time=87.294 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=11 ttl=252 time=88.289 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=12 ttl=252 time=88.739 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=13 ttl=252 time=88.257 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=14 ttl=252 time=97.213 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=15 ttl=252 time=97.182 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=16 ttl=252 time=89.147 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=17 ttl=252 time=88.140 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=18 ttl=252 time=87.112 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=19 ttl=252 time=87.081 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=20 ttl=252 time=97.052 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=21 ttl=252 time=97.039 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=22 ttl=252 time=117.003 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=23 ttl=252 time=87.021 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=24 ttl=252 time=97.917 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=25 ttl=252 time=96.968 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=26 ttl=252 time=87.049 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=27 ttl=252 time=86.965 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=28 ttl=252 time=86.893 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=29 ttl=252 time=97.865 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=30 ttl=252 time=86.962 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=31 ttl=252 time=176.837 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=32 ttl=252 time=86.813 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=33 ttl=252 time=86.733 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=34 ttl=252 time=106.735 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=35 ttl=252 time=86.669 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=36 ttl=252 time=96.699 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=37 ttl=252 time=86.655 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=38 ttl=252 time=116.748 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=39 ttl=252 time=86.686 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=40 ttl=252 time=86.534 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=41 ttl=252 time=97.553 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=42 ttl=252 time=86.498 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=43 ttl=252 time=86.645 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=44 ttl=252 time=87.479 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=45 ttl=252 time=86.414 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=46 ttl=252 time=96.355 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=47 ttl=252 time=96.351 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=48 ttl=252 time=86.331 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=49 ttl=252 time=86.347 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=50 ttl=252 time=86.294 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=51 ttl=252 time=86.286 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=52 ttl=252 time=86.255 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=53 ttl=252 time=86.229 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=54 ttl=252 time=86.451 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=55 ttl=252 time=96.212 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=56 ttl=252 time=96.265 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=57 ttl=252 time=96.141 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=58 ttl=252 time=106.124 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=59 ttl=252 time=86.051 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=60 ttl=252 time=96.057 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=61 ttl=252 time=96.017 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=62 ttl=252 time=86.013 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=63 ttl=252 time=95.981 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=64 ttl=252 time=95.950 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=65 ttl=252 time=85.936 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=66 ttl=252 time=85.884 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=67 ttl=252 time=85.877 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=68 ttl=252 time=85.827 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=69 ttl=252 time=95.885 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=70 ttl=252 time=85.780 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=71 ttl=252 time=85.857 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=72 ttl=252 time=106.009 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=73 ttl=252 time=95.700 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=74 ttl=252 time=85.673 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=75 ttl=252 time=95.633 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=76 ttl=252 time=95.706 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=77 ttl=252 time=85.583 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=78 ttl=252 time=85.565 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=79 ttl=252 time=105.773 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=80 ttl=252 time=85.494 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=81 ttl=252 time=85.465 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=82 ttl=252 time=85.442 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=83 ttl=252 time=85.466 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=84 ttl=252 time=85.396 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=85 ttl=252 time=95.392 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=86 ttl=252 time=106.739 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=87 ttl=252 time=95.362 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=88 ttl=252 time=95.333 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=89 ttl=252 time=85.292 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=90 ttl=252 time=85.245 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=91 ttl=252 time=75.233 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=92 ttl=252 time=95.214 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=93 ttl=252 time=95.249 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=94 ttl=252 time=95.201 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=95 ttl=252 time=85.115 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=96 ttl=252 time=85.093 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=97 ttl=252 time=135.080 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=98 ttl=252 time=96.011 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=99 ttl=252 time=105.048 ms 64 bytes from 10.213.251.131: icmp_seq=100 ttl=252 time=84.961 ms ^C --- 10.213.251.131 ping statistics --- 101 packets transmitted, 101 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 75.233/92.979/176.837/11.984 ms Hmm...The standard deviation is 12ms , which seems to be okay
|
|
|
|
|
|
prasys
|
Oct 9 2007, 02:28 PM
|
Heros Never Die
|
Dude
Firstly , I dont suggest you to go with maxis. Read all the rants and raves about it. Unless you want a mobile broadband. If you are a heavy downloader , please stick to streamyx.
Maxis is not for heavy p2pers. If you want torrent freedom without 3g cap then go for their Internet2Go package , that gives you an external IP with no p2p blocks (you don't get blocked) and you are assign a different IP Range
|
|
|
|
|
|
prasys
|
Oct 11 2007, 09:08 AM
|
Heros Never Die
|
I am thinking of downgrading as well....Not worth the upgrade now. You better wait till maxis admits their problem and improves their infrastructure
|
|
|
|
|