Dec 15 2006, 02:47 PM
QUOTE(thankyou @ Dec 15 2006, 12:00 PM)
Next... China!! 
WORST!
Tracing route to www.btchina.net [220.196.42.5]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 9 ms 2 ms 1 ms 192.168.0.1
2 101 ms 89 ms 89 ms 10.213.251.131
3 88 ms 89 ms 89 ms 10.213.140.193
4 88 ms 89 ms 89 ms 10.213.159.13
5 86 ms 134 ms 102 ms 192.168.186.2
6 91 ms 99 ms 99 ms 10.213.8.1
7 98 ms 99 ms 99 ms 202.179.111.74
8 98 ms 99 ms 99 ms 202.179.111.69
9 98 ms 99 ms 99 ms B098P0200000.maxis.net.my [202.75.135.97]
10 96 ms 101 ms 98 ms B097F0400000.maxis.net.my [202.75.128.60]
11 97 ms 99 ms 99 ms B001F0210300.maxis.net.my [202.75.128.30]
12 148 ms 139 ms 139 ms p1-0-1-1.a00.kslrml01.my.ra.gin.ntt.net [203.78.
193.5]
13 128 ms 129 ms 129 ms ge-1-0-0.r01.kslrml01.my.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250
.16.145]
14 139 ms 148 ms 139 ms p1-1-2-1.r00.sngpsi01.sg.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250
.2.4]
15 317 ms 329 ms 359 ms as-0.r04.sttlwa01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.3.2
53]
16 297 ms 306 ms 289 ms p16-0-1-2.r20.sttlwa01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.25
0.2.68]
17 298 ms 298 ms 300 ms POS3-0.BR2.SEA1.ALTER.NET [204.255.169.97]
18 308 ms 309 ms 308 ms 0.so-4-3-0.XT1.SEA1.ALTER.NET [152.63.106.10]
19 305 ms 309 ms 319 ms 0.so-7-0-0.XL1.SAC1.ALTER.NET [152.63.53.249]
20 318 ms 319 ms 308 ms 0.so-3-0-0.XR1.SAC1.ALTER.NET [152.63.53.238]
21 306 ms 308 ms 319 ms 185.ATM6-0.GW3.SAC1.ALTER.NET [152.63.51.105]
22 276 ms 279 ms 289 ms chinaunicom-gw.customer.alter.net [157.130.207.1
18]
23 278 ms 278 ms 289 ms 211.94.39.29
24 281 ms 278 ms 289 ms 211.94.44.10
25 280 ms 279 ms 279 ms 211.95.88.25
26 288 ms 279 ms 288 ms 211.95.74.17
27 * * ^C
14 139 ms 148 ms 139 ms p1-1-2-1.r00.sngpsi01.sg.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250
.2.4] <--- Singapore NTT? Why can't they use this for all singapore site? Why maxis still need to route through US? Any Network expert can explain this?
So... Maxis ---> NTT(SG) ---> NTT (US) ---> ALTER a.k.a UUNet ---> China
Singtel.com.sg Maxis --> TMnet exchange --> Singtel exchange
Starhub.com.sg Maxis --> NTT(MY) --> NTT(SG) --> Starhub
SLOW! if its TMnet... its direct! so what can you say? Who beats who?
there are several reason why maxis route to US to go to China website: WORST!Tracing route to www.btchina.net [220.196.42.5]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 9 ms 2 ms 1 ms 192.168.0.1
2 101 ms 89 ms 89 ms 10.213.251.131
3 88 ms 89 ms 89 ms 10.213.140.193
4 88 ms 89 ms 89 ms 10.213.159.13
5 86 ms 134 ms 102 ms 192.168.186.2
6 91 ms 99 ms 99 ms 10.213.8.1
7 98 ms 99 ms 99 ms 202.179.111.74
8 98 ms 99 ms 99 ms 202.179.111.69
9 98 ms 99 ms 99 ms B098P0200000.maxis.net.my [202.75.135.97]
10 96 ms 101 ms 98 ms B097F0400000.maxis.net.my [202.75.128.60]
11 97 ms 99 ms 99 ms B001F0210300.maxis.net.my [202.75.128.30]
12 148 ms 139 ms 139 ms p1-0-1-1.a00.kslrml01.my.ra.gin.ntt.net [203.78.
193.5]
13 128 ms 129 ms 129 ms ge-1-0-0.r01.kslrml01.my.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250
.16.145]
14 139 ms 148 ms 139 ms p1-1-2-1.r00.sngpsi01.sg.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250
.2.4]
15 317 ms 329 ms 359 ms as-0.r04.sttlwa01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.3.2
53]
16 297 ms 306 ms 289 ms p16-0-1-2.r20.sttlwa01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.25
0.2.68]
17 298 ms 298 ms 300 ms POS3-0.BR2.SEA1.ALTER.NET [204.255.169.97]
18 308 ms 309 ms 308 ms 0.so-4-3-0.XT1.SEA1.ALTER.NET [152.63.106.10]
19 305 ms 309 ms 319 ms 0.so-7-0-0.XL1.SAC1.ALTER.NET [152.63.53.249]
20 318 ms 319 ms 308 ms 0.so-3-0-0.XR1.SAC1.ALTER.NET [152.63.53.238]
21 306 ms 308 ms 319 ms 185.ATM6-0.GW3.SAC1.ALTER.NET [152.63.51.105]
22 276 ms 279 ms 289 ms chinaunicom-gw.customer.alter.net [157.130.207.1
18]
23 278 ms 278 ms 289 ms 211.94.39.29
24 281 ms 278 ms 289 ms 211.94.44.10
25 280 ms 279 ms 279 ms 211.95.88.25
26 288 ms 279 ms 288 ms 211.95.74.17
27 * * ^C
14 139 ms 148 ms 139 ms p1-1-2-1.r00.sngpsi01.sg.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250
.2.4] <--- Singapore NTT? Why can't they use this for all singapore site? Why maxis still need to route through US? Any Network expert can explain this?
So... Maxis ---> NTT(SG) ---> NTT (US) ---> ALTER a.k.a UUNet ---> China
Singtel.com.sg Maxis --> TMnet exchange --> Singtel exchange
Starhub.com.sg Maxis --> NTT(MY) --> NTT(SG) --> Starhub
SLOW! if its TMnet... its direct! so what can you say? Who beats who?
1) the singapore NTT did not have directy peering to China (so need to go to other route)
2) the bandwidth pipe to US from Singapore is more bigger than from Singapore directly to China (maybe from singapore to china just 10mbps while from singapore to US is 1Gbps and then from US to China is also 1Gbps)
3) maybe currently peering to china from singapore have problem (maybe submarine cable problem)
4) or maybe the network admin just config it like that
Quote
0.0904sec
0.40
7 queries
GZIP Disabled