Is the pricing correct ? Not sure if I heard wrongly or what, I was told it's at least 6xx psf, somemore 3k per floor.

Very aggressive pricing from a first time developer.

I won't put on bet on it as I have no idea about the developers financial. 'Sekali' become another Duet Residence. LOL.

But I was told the new access road with a bridge crossing to Taylor's college is ***REAL***.

MPSJ is collecting money from all the developers to fund this road. Question remains is when will MPSJ start work.

In the map provided by twin residence, there is also a new bridge crossing the Kesas highway (parallel to existing bridge), next to the existing school.

This is something additional compared to what's drawn by Ohako.

These two new bridges will give new life to this area if they are coming true.

That's the thing. No date is mentioned.

But they keep approving more projects and keep collecting contribution from the developers.

I wonder how they work out the amount of contribution from each developer.

That sounds more like it ... I was told it's 6xx psf. And every floor 3k. Duh !

If you read back the old posts, a few people said it's < 600 psf.

No land cost, good lar, then translate it to cheaper selling price lar.

Why still more expensive than Ohako ?

This post has been edited by puchongite: Jan 17 2015, 04:55 PM

That's not the end of the story. More projects coming up.

War lau this Twinz also BBB ? Kaw tao kaw tao .....

Quiet ?

Some one posted in this thread ( you can scroll up to read ), almost fully sold for the first tower wor.

I was like eye popped out !

You would understand it better if you go to Tesco Pusat Bandar Puchong today as I just came back from there.

They are showing the sales chart there.

It's slightly less than 50% sticker in my estimate. Most of the sticker are sticked to the lower floors.

Let say if one car park is 360 sf, the way I read it for two car park :-

maintenance = ( 1000 + 360 + 360 ) * 0.3

For people who have 3 car park, add another 360 into it.

If the figure comes out too big, then they can also adjust the figure 0.3, but the figure 0.3 should apply to everybody.

Sorry I have no idea of the implementation, I was just trying to understand from the post mentioned about the act which is supposed to come into action June 2015.

I doubt it has been implemented by anyone.

Hate to sound like sabotage but these are signs of the project will be hitting trouble some time down the road.

Small unknown developer some more ! Avoid at all costs !

You don't get me or you are trying to defend your pay master ? The point is for small % of sales, the developer has to fork out more money to complete the entire project. More money will be held up in the form of unsold props. Is a small developer able to that ?

Nonsense ! You are ignoring what I am trying to bring out. Trinity products were selling quite well. Above certain % of sales the developer will be able to roll its cash flow. Basic common sense.

This post has been edited by puchongite: Oct 11 2015, 05:55 PM

Damn, google is so powerful !