I 'm the buyer of 2D, kind of disappointed when look at those balconies. This make me feel those balconies are only for u to easy maintain the sliding doors, even worst for master bedroom balconies, it can only allow single person to stand on it!

What will the cost incur, if cancel after S&P signed? Or will it possible switch it to merrydale end lot/corner lot?

Below is my email to EcoMajestic management, hope they treat my feed back seriously:

"As one of the early buyers of Tenderfield 2D, I would like to express my disappointment after the visit of the Show Gallery for the actual show unit. Generally I like the design, but I found the show unit build up dimensions is not exactly according to the S&P floor plan whereby the width of the house is only about 23ft which is lack of hefty 2ft! This is in contrast to those Cradleton show units whereby their built up are exactly 24ft or 22ft in width and make those units feel and look spacious than Tenderfield. By just looking at those Cradleton show units, I can't imagine those Cradleton corner/end lots will be even more spacious than Tenderfield due to extra 2ft they have. This is really NOT acceptable whereby we paid premium for cluster semi-D but end up our build up (width) is less than terrace house (Cradleton).

I hope EcoWorld take my feedback seriously when construct the actual units to prevent the dispute when comes to Vacant Possession."

Hi bro, you are right, i measured through the tiles, whereby the total tiles are 11.5pcs, which make it 23ft. Then i studied the floor plan more properly, i found out actually the front portion (living hall + dining hall) is smaller than the rear portion by 2ft . Hence is correct that living hall is 23ft instead of 25ft.

By studied the floor plan, i found out that the measurement of 1st floor in brochure is diff from S&P. In brochure the width measurement is not include the side balcony as below:
[attachmentid=4247840]

But S&P width measurement is included side balcony as below:
[attachmentid=4247841]

Do u think we able to claim back the spaces occupied by side balcony due to false advertised info given by ecoworld? Our buying decision is based on the brochures and not the S&P This my fault also during S&P signing didn't notice the difference! I hope EcoWorld kind enuf to build the actual unit without include the side balcony as bonus to us as early supporters to their project

This is indeed very informative. I will attach the news to EcoWorld as strong base for us to redeem our rights.

I have talked to the SA who responsible for my purchase, he said their management is acknowledged on this and will provide us the update. He told me few buyers already make the same complaints to them. This is the power of forum and FB . The purchasers of 2D who not make the complaint yet, please do so and quote we are all group together thru lowyat forum and FB (this is what i told them), so that they know we are not act alone!

I got the latest update from the SA whereby they currently propose to the management to extent the dining hall and living hall to full 25ft which mean the veranda which originally outside and below the 1st floor side balcony now will become part of the dining hall and living so that overall Tenderfield 2D will be looking more spacious

They cannot build the side balcony outside of the 25ft due to authority issue whereby for Tenderfields it must have 10ft fields in order to classify as cluster semi-D

Hopefully the management will approve the suggestion.