Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 EcoMajestic @ Semenyih (VERSION 6), ~Party Started for MerryDale~

views
     
kamilnu
post Nov 20 2014, 10:03 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,170 posts

Joined: Mar 2013
QUOTE(Chris Chew @ Nov 20 2014, 03:04 PM)
Very subjective.

The portion to rent in Semenyih is very low and even lower for those desperate to rent in Semenyih. Thats the fact today.

We also can look into the fact of below ;
10 years ago, not much people is willing to rent at the matured location of Kepong or Menjalara unless below RM 1k, and a lot of people said, who is even willing to rent Desa Park City, which was even deeper into Kepong and on the mining land and sold at so high price ( compare to best location of Menjalara back then )

Fast forward to 3-4 years back and DPC very matured and successful, why some expats and some pros willing to pay so much btw RM 5-7k just to rent in Desa Park City but why not RM 1.5-2k in Kepong?

If we have to see into next 10 years, by 2024, I believe Eco Majestic would be more than 50-60% matured ( based on the speed they intend and EM is more than twice bigger than DPC ) and I would say Eco Majestic / Setia Eco Hill live up their own township and the area of Semenyih rather than people think they stay or rent in Semenyih.

That's what DPC did at Kepong area and how Bdr Setia Alam / Eco Park self contained twonship rather than being involve together with Klang although people described Setia Alam is Klang border or secluded Meru area during the first launch.
*
As they say in the stock market "Pass performances is not an indication of future performance"

This post has been edited by kamilnu: Nov 20 2014, 10:04 PM
kamilnu
post Dec 7 2014, 01:35 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,170 posts

Joined: Mar 2013
QUOTE(wesleycjh @ Dec 6 2014, 10:55 PM)
This is indeed very informative. I will attach the news to EcoWorld as strong base for us to redeem our rights. rclxms.gif
*
Read the fine print below the back page of the brochure. There must be a disclaimer saying that the brochure is for illustration purposes la....correct at time of print la...indicative only la.

Developer are smart people..thats why they built house and sell to you and not the other way round. Good luck though.
kamilnu
post Dec 7 2014, 01:47 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,170 posts

Joined: Mar 2013
QUOTE(Jasoncat @ Dec 6 2014, 06:08 PM)
Good! Purchaser's right is protected smile.gif
EM need to handle it well, else may get itself into unnecessary trouble.
*
Wake up...which planet you came from. This is Bolehland, consumers got no right one....haisss
kamilnu
post Dec 11 2014, 09:19 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,170 posts

Joined: Mar 2013
Since when living in a terrace house considered living luxurious? Amazing. I thought living in a mansion is luxury, no?
kamilnu
post Dec 18 2014, 07:14 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,170 posts

Joined: Mar 2013
QUOTE(wesleycjh @ Dec 18 2014, 05:51 PM)
I got the latest update from the SA whereby they currently propose to the management to extent the dining hall and living hall to full 25ft which mean the veranda which originally outside and below the 1st floor side balcony now will become part of the dining hall and living so that overall Tenderfield 2D will be looking more spacious  smile.gif

They cannot build the side balcony outside of the 25ft due to authority issue whereby for Tenderfields it must have 10ft fields in order to classify as cluster semi-D  sad.gif

Hopefully the management will approve the suggestion.
*
Mgmt does not need to listen to their SAs...EM will sell good with or without their proposal.

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0364sec    0.47    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 11th December 2025 - 01:25 PM