Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Storage Setup, (SSD and HDD)

views
     
TSAivihc
post Oct 23 2014, 03:02 PM, updated 12y ago

Casual
***
Junior Member
466 posts

Joined: Feb 2013
From: Jesselton, North Borneo
So.. looking at revamping my SSD/HDD setup on my desktop. At the moment I have 240GB SSD (For OS and programs) and one 2tb drive(storage). The question is do I need another SSD for scratch file (for LR catalog/backup)? kinda noob about SSD blush.gif

So what is your setup for SSD/HDD in terms of running a program/swapping files/storage/backup?

This topic open for photography & videography smile.gif
LegendLee
post Oct 24 2014, 09:38 AM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(Aivihc @ Oct 23 2014, 03:02 PM)
So.. looking at revamping my SSD/HDD setup on my desktop. At the moment I have 240GB SSD (For OS and programs) and one 2tb drive(storage). The question is do I need another SSD for scratch file (for LR catalog/backup)? kinda noob about SSDĀ  blush.gif

So what is your setup for SSD/HDD in terms of running a program/swapping files/storage/backup?

This topic open for photography & videography smile.gif
*
I usually have
1 1TB HDD for active back up for the OS. (External 2.5 that is always connected but easily swappable)

1 3.5 3TB HDD to store images and where I keep my LR catalog. - SSD will make it faster too. I believe having a separate disk as the scratch file can help.

2TB HDD to to store my videos (External 2.5 for easy swapping)

Thunderbolt Raided HDD for video editing software scratch file - SSD will work too.

1 3.5 5TB HDD as the backup to the video editing software files.

This may not be the best setup. But I feel comfortable with sufficient number of redundancy incase something happens halfway through. *touchwood* and I still prefer HDD due to the size/price factor. Though the price of SSD have been steadily decreasing to make it a very legit consideration.

This post has been edited by LegendLee: Oct 24 2014, 09:43 AM
SUSsupersound
post Oct 26 2014, 02:49 PM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
11,554 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
A HDD can last solid 5 years while a SSD will be more than that. But the cost you think of it.
Burning it to DVD also another way, but beware, it can last you for 4-5 years only as some files tends to unable to read.
Re writable DVD will last longer.
LegendLee
post Oct 26 2014, 09:02 PM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(supersound @ Oct 26 2014, 02:49 PM)
A HDD can last solid 5 years while a SSD will be more than that. But the cost you think of it.
Burning it to DVD also another way, but beware, it can last you for 4-5 years only as some files tends to unable to read.
Re writable DVD will last longer.
*
Burning GB upon GB of data into DVD is an incredibly troublesome process.
If I've 10TB of data, it'll take forever to burn them onto DVDs
SUSsupersound
post Oct 26 2014, 09:49 PM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
11,554 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(LegendLee @ Oct 26 2014, 09:02 PM)
Burning GB upon GB of data into DVD is an incredibly troublesome process.
If I've 10TB of data, it'll take forever to burn them onto DVDs
*
Yes, you are right, so it depends greatly what we need at the end of day.
Like my D800's RAW each file need 7+MB, so you can imagine how much storage if I want to store under this format.
For mini DV tape's quality, 1 hour need about 13-15GB.
Now a HDD are dirt cheap, so I will choose HDD over SSD. External would last longer, so I won't worry on this.
DecaPix
post Oct 28 2014, 01:48 PM

5 star monkey
*******
Senior Member
3,000 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
From: PeeJay
for TS requirement..wont pumping in more RAM actually help in the swap file /scratch?
SSD is good for the OS and program while HDD for storage.
get a NAS for backup as well
LegendLee
post Oct 29 2014, 01:59 PM

><3LG3|\|D
Group Icon
Elite
2,725 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(DecaPix @ Oct 28 2014, 01:48 PM)
for TS requirement..wont pumping in more RAM actually help in the swap file /scratch?
SSD is good for the OS and program while HDD for storage.
get a NAS for backup as well
*
Why is there a need for NAS when you're the only user and you're mainly editing from one computer ?

NAS is also more expensive and is slower than USB 3.0 assuming Gigabit Ethernet.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0172sec    0.52    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 22nd December 2025 - 04:17 AM