salam. saya ingin bertanya.

apa hukumnya baca buku waktu khutbah? saya bercadang nak bawak buku kecik untuk dibaca sewaktu khutbah. sebab setau saya yang tak dibenarkan sewaktu khutbah ialah bercakap2. kalau main henfon pula saya tengok ramai je yang main henfon.

apakah hukumnya baca buku (bukan buku keagamaan) sewaktu khutbah? dan adakah ianya kelihatan pelik/janggal?

It seems you missed the rational argument here.

When you preach your God is the only true God and theirs is false (that means their Gods are fakes), you receive some reactions. So these people reacted to Muhammad when he claimed that and denounced their beliefs. So they became angry at Muhammad, just like you would. So they persecuted Muhammad, mocked him and chased him out of Mecca.

There are more to the story but I purposely keep it simple just to put the message across. Pagan Arabs being the local inhabitants, did what you would do, and that they were not really as bad as Islamic sources or teachers painted them to be.

There were also many cases which exemplified the intolerance of Muslims, particularly when Islam or Muhammad was insulted. There was even a case a self proclaimed prophet was killed because of that.

Again it is not quite true. I am not here to bash Muhammad or Islam. That is not my intention. I am here to set a few perspectives right because I found out many Muslims are told only the one sided version of Muhammad, which tends to paint him as exemplary, a perfect role model for humanity. He was not as perfect or moral as you thought or told. That is my point of view after numerous readings.

But I do agree that coming here into your Muslim Fellowship thread is a bad taste on my part. I apologize for causing the people here undue stress. Thank you for your patience in having me for a couple of posts.

read a thread of someone finding a rat in their mutton soup (i.e. the soup is not supposed to contain rat, only mutton lah)... so tried to look up what we should do if it happened to us. the following is not about rat, but on the fundamental level it is similar in that it is something haram to eat.

Btw, rats & mice are haram to eat according to jumhur 'ulama. One of the cause is the following principle:

Al-Baihaqiy rahimahullah berkata :
قال أصحابنا : فالذي أمر بقتله في الحل والحرم يحرم أكله ، والذي نهى عن قتله يحرم أكله.........
“Telah berkata shahabat-shahabat kami (ulama Syaafi’iyyah) : Hewan yang diperintahkan untuk dibunuh di tanah haram ataupun halal, maka diharamkan untuk memakannya. Begitu puga hewan yang dilarang untuk membunuhnya, terlarang pula untuk memakannya…..” [Ash-Shughraa, 8/294].

An-Nawawiy rahimahullah berkata :
ما أمر بقتله من الحيوانات فأكله حرام
“Semua hewan yang diperintahkan untuk membunuhnya, haram dimakan” [Al-Majmuu’, 9/22].

[start excerpt]
Syaikh Abdul Aziz bin Baz ditanya: “jika seseorang makan daging babi karena tidak tahu, apakah ada kafarahnya? Jika ada apakah kafarahnya?”.

Syaikh menjawab:

ليس عليه شيء ما دام لا يعلم، ليس عليه شيء، إنما عليه أن يتمضمض ويغسل فمه من آثار النجاسة ويغسل يديه، والحمد لله. لكن إذا لم يتمضمض أو لم يذكر لحم خنزير إلا بعد حين ماذا يفعل؟ ج/ ما عليه شيء

“Tidak ada kewajiban apa-apa baginya, selama ia memakannya karena tidak tahu sedikit pun. Yang perlu ia lakukan adalah berkumur-kumur dan mencuci mulutnya dari sisa-sisa najis (daging babi) dan mencuci tangannya. Walhamdulillah. Namun jika memakannya pada waktu yang sudah berlalu lama sekali dan ia ketika itu tidak berkumur-kumur, apa yang perlu dilakukan? Jawabnya: tidak perlu melakukan apa-apa” (Sumber: http://www.binbaz.org.sa/node/12018).

Al Lajnah Ad Daimah lil Buhuts Wal Ifta juga ditanya: “seseorang makan daging babi dalam keadaan tidak tahu. Lalu setelah ia selesai makan, datang orang lain yang mengatakan bahwa yang dimakan itu daging babi. Dan daging bagi sebagaimana kita ketahui, hukumnya haram bagi seorang Muslim. Apa yang mesti ia lakukan?”

Mereka menjawab:

لا يلزمه شيء تجاه ذلك ولا حرج عليه؛ لكونه لا يعلم أنه لحم خنزير، وإنما يلزمه التحري والحذر في المستقبل‏

“Tidak ada kewajiban apa-apa baginya, dan itu tidak masalah. Karena ia tidak tahu yang dimakan adalah daging babi. Yang perlu ia lakukan adalah berhati-hati dan waspada di masa depan” (Fatawa Al Lajnah Ad Daimah jilid 4, no. 7290‏ pertanyaan ke-5).
Sumber: https://muslim.or.id/27355-makan-daging-bab...-dilakukan.html

[end excerpt]

ustaz zaharuddin kata wajib
KWSP sebelum ni tak shariah compliance = so haram but kita takda kuasa mengubah/memilih = tak boleh buat apa
sekarang dah ada shariah KWSP maka wajib tukar

edit: btw aku dah tukar, pergi mana2 cawangan pon boleh, aku pergi dekat bandar pucong ada 1, siap ada kaunter tambahan (time tu lah) 15 minit selesai

Question is:

why banks cannot simply provide a house loan/car loan/ etc that we just pay back the amount we borrow but not including the extra fees?

Example:

rm100k for house loan. So we pay back exactly rm100k within 25 years for example.

Why they cannot do it? WHY? 

true that. but money is one of the ribawi items, hence no "profit" is allowed if it is transacted with money. I mean, in this case you are loaning money, and you will pay with money - whether paid in one go or in installment.

"profit" is allowed if it is a normal "physical item" (say, a car, a house, smakfon, etc.) for credit payment. As the others have stated, you can sell iPhone 7 plus at RM 4k for one time payment, or a total of RM 4.1k for a three time payment. but this must be agreed when buying, cannot have conditional terms like: I will buy the iPhone 7 plus from you at RM4k, but If I cannot pay you in full then I will pay you RM 4.1k (i.e. in this example, both agree two prices may take effect).

Disclaimer:
There are a lot of things/rulings on islamic economics. I have to confess, I failed even normal economics (to the extent that during my school days getting a C score would be a success for me) - so I cannot grasp everything on islamic economics. However, I have heard before that inflation can be considered. (will try to find source later)

thanks... but TLTR
can summarize ala /k or not?

isu dulu, wahabi vs <tak ingat nama>
sorang tambah2 agama eg: molidul rasul
sorang lagi taknak tambah2 agama eg: molidul rasul adalah hareem

Thanks for your comment.

Actually those who embrace Islam from their own research, and on their own accord - I have much respect for them. Many times they put me to shame with their knowledge of the deen, their steadfastness and especially their willingness to follow the sunnah!

is it true there will be 3 nights without sunlight before the sun rise from the west?

If that is the case, then, not "sometimes" but "most of the times" liberal is okay.. Because we do agree on freedom on a lot of things to ourselves, human rights.
If someone is against LGBT, then be against LGBT, not liberals.

I know.. Ceramah keep saying liberal is bad, syiah is bad, itu ini bad, without intellectual reasons. That is why I see a lot of malays in facebook comment gila2 maki liberals, then when I ask them what is liberalism, they can't answer shit. Masjid need to stop teaching hate to us Muslims, and teach love and understanding instead.

If people have disagreements with orthodox teachings, and there are other interpretations that they deem more rational or acceptable, that is their choice. Just like the orthodox traditionalist muslims who have their own interpretation of the Quran or hadith. If one side can interpret the Quran, why can't the other? What makes one group holier than the other? None of us have prophets with us, so none of us can claim that only we are the absolute truth. As long as that opinion do not hurt other people (such as radical muslims interpretations), then we can discuss like an adult, intellectually.

And just because some opinions sounds so different from the teaching that we have inherited since nenek moyang, unquestioned, we shouldn't be silencing them with "jangan persoal", or simply brushing them as "sesat", or deleting people's comments.

If we believe our opinion is more plausible, and we can counter-argue, then counter-argue. Otherwise, leave it be, let other people deal with it.
Asking question will help us learn. Absolutely. Just like in any other subject. Just like in school. We ask question, we get answer, we are more educated. That is common sense.

salamualaikum my brothers, glad to see this thread..

hope to gain more info from you guys about islam..

imams should do qunut nazilah, instead of the normal qunut - at least for now la.

that "hakikat" should never stop us from praying
and if we do pray, that "hakikat" will not stop us from getting the rewards

btw, KWSP/EPF kene bayar zakat? aku google kena tapi tak sure bayar setiap tahun atau bayar bila keluar?

ok dah jumpa sos kata bayar bila keluar http://blog.zakatselangor.com.my/simpanan-...kat-atau-tidak/
sebab time dalam EPF belum sempurna milik kita

lol, aku tak bayar zakat pendapatan. dulu aku pernah pergi pejabat zakat tanya camna nak kira, yang dia tanya zakat wang simpanan aje (aku ingat pendapatan ni = zakat perniagaan lol)

btw camne nak kira, aku tengok zakat selangor nya website kalkulator tah apa tak faham, ayam hanyalah buruh nelayan petani bukan jaguh sukan.jutawan
kalau dah bayar ansuran, means bila deposit semua EPF nanti takyah bayar langsung? btw, ayam duduk selangor liao, ikut selangor fatwa

for me, i don't pay zakat pendapatan - if you guys are talking about the monthly payment type
my basis is that would be like "double taxation"
i pay RM## every month, then every one year  I pay RM ### - calculation which includes money from the balance of my salary (of course, the full calculation includes my savings and all other whatever la). so i just pay once a year.
on a more religious stand point, i follow the ruling that there is no such thing as zakat pendapatan (monthly payment type). there is only zakat maal (zakat harta), calculated and paid on an annual basis.
the common and logical argument that supports this is that in the old days of the Prophet (PBUH) and sahabat, there are already people who work and earn salary. it was never known that these people pay zakat on a monthly basis.

one can, of course, argue that the monthly payment is like dividing your yearly zakat by 12. fine, la. but i just think it's premature to pay when really, you need to ensure that your harta meets the criteria of having a full year (hijri year) completed where the amount exceeds the minimum threshold (equiv to 85 g of gold, iirc). full year means the amount never drops below 85 g of gold. if it drops, the counter should reset upon the time the amount recovers. it's also like trying to stay ahead of fate (takdir), as if you already know what will happen (i.e. that you will meet the full year and amount criteria). who knows, we might die the next day and therefore we are liberated from the obligation to pay zakat, since we did not complete the full year cycle.

but that's just me and what ruling i hold on to. not trying to force it upon anyone.

aku macam pernah dengar tak boleh bayar zakat (haram la kot) kalau tak cukup syarat, sebab ia dikira zalim (sebab zakat ni wajib, maka bila diwajib kan pada orang yang tak mampu=zalim)
tapi kalau niat sedekah tak sure, patutnya tiada masaalah