QUOTE(Someonesim @ Mar 26 2017, 04:56 PM)
Erm, cant brain you bro
I said/wrote that Intel will win when comes to game. You deny it then go ahead explain why Ryzen 5 wont win
You said gaming is your main concern, I replied, then you said you're not pure gaming
For platform, mostly not a concern unless you're those that upgrade every generation. If you want future proofing for more than 8 threads, there's Ryzen 7 already available

1700 are pretty much 1800X, what you need are some time to OC it and it even comes with free RGB lighting cooler.
I know you're trying to convince that you want Ryzen 5 4core build

Nothing wrong there
Unless I missed it, but there's no confirmation on Ryzen 5's core arrangement yet ( likely 6 core = 3+3 ), but if Ryzen 5 4 core are 2+2 then GG your gaming performance
You're better with true 8 cores or 6 cores if multitasking is your thing, than rely on that 8 threads ( which doesnt guarantee performance boost, if there is, will not be too much ).
Your reply here
QUOTE
If 4C/8T then for sure lost to i7 ( maybe even i5 ) then, as Intel have much higher clock speed and higher OC speed. If I'm still pure gaming then no doubt I will get i5/i7.
Which i assumed you meant the 4C/8T Ryzen will lost to i5/i7 while the 6C/12T and over won't?
I should rephrase that, Ryzen's gaming performance is my main concern alongside budget. I've used 4C/8T processors for like 6-7 years? Along those years only Crysis 3 actually managed to utilized all 8 threads and over according to recent Ryzen reviews and another game that show similar scaling is Mafia 3? Battlefield 1 is another game but that only scale up to 8 threads.
IPC is the most important for gaming and since all Ryzen chips have similar oc ceiling and very few games will scale over/up to 8 threads then there is no reason for me to buy an R7.
My original plan is to get a 1600x/1600 but i was wondering if i could get away with 1500x and upgrade to Zen+ in a year or 2 since it will bring better IPC and maybe higher clock speed because of processing maturity. Hopefully they will fix or improve latency between CCXs as well.
Hopefully review of R5 will prove me wrong though.
AMD already confirmed that 6 cores will have 3+3 and 4 cores is 2+2. Multitasking was never a problem for me with my current processor.
QUOTE(goldfries @ Mar 26 2017, 08:51 PM)
Nope, not always the case. I've done tests on my own, will be publishing it soon.
Case by case really, do not assume RAM speed affects all forms of rendering.
I know.
QUOTE(Someonesim @ Mar 26 2017, 10:25 PM)
That will be good research
Need advice if we should cough out more money for that faster RAM
Hence why I have no issue aiming Ryzne 5 1600 now

as I'm on X34 with 1070, which means most games are bottleneck on my GPU

I'm still on 1080p and got CPU bottlenecked pretty hard in some games. D: