pump boat tu apee?
Military Thread V13
Military Thread V13
|
|
Sep 4 2014, 02:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
177 posts Joined: Jul 2013 |
pump boat tu apee?
|
|
|
Sep 4 2014, 02:39 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
177 posts Joined: Jul 2013 |
QUOTE(KYPMbangi @ Sep 4 2014, 02:25 PM) Map shows what each country's military camouflage pattern looks like link rosak abam[Click for full size image] Msia camo is not there.. huhu.. |
|
|
Sep 4 2014, 02:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
177 posts Joined: Jul 2013 |
|
|
|
Sep 4 2014, 03:18 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
177 posts Joined: Jul 2013 |
QUOTE(KYPMbangi @ Sep 4 2014, 03:11 PM) I like this. Pilak impression like< "Army, army everywhere.jpg". |
|
|
Sep 5 2014, 05:28 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
177 posts Joined: Jul 2013 |
^^ wtf link got flyingspeghettimonster
|
|
|
Sep 8 2014, 10:01 AM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
177 posts Joined: Jul 2013 |
![]() Zhejiang province |
|
|
Sep 8 2014, 10:13 AM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
177 posts Joined: Jul 2013 |
The picture from last year. It's a mock model to be display in National Defense educational Base.
|
|
|
Sep 17 2014, 05:16 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
177 posts Joined: Jul 2013 |
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Sep 17 2014, 11:07 AM) Secret discussions revealed: US asks Malaysia for Maritime Reconnaissance base in Sabah what the big deal? RAAF P-3 operate in "penang"~singapore long time already.![]() A Boeing P-8 Poseidon Maritime Reconnaissance Aircraft According to a senior diplomat familiar with the talks, the US have been discussing with Malaysian government officials for 'some time' on the possibility of a basing agreement in the Malaysian state of Sabah for US P-8 Poseidon maritime reconnaissance planes to monitor the South China Sea. The statement seems to have been confirmed by the US Chief of Naval Operations, Admiral Jonathan W. Greenert when he spoke at a forum in Washington last week. He was quoted as "the recent offer by Malaysia for P-8 Poseidon aircraft to fly out of the country’s most eastern area would give the United States greater proximity to the South China Sea". Malaysian Defense minister Tun Hishamuddin Hussein,when asked by local press about an agreement for a Malaysian-US deal on 'US fighters' to operate out of Sabah, the minister replied: "that is not true". (Although as P-8 Poseidons are not "fighter" planes.... so technically the MENHAN did not lie.... News Link:Malaysia to base US Navy Poseidons? |
|
|
Sep 25 2014, 11:57 AM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
177 posts Joined: Jul 2013 |
|
|
|
Oct 9 2014, 05:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
177 posts Joined: Jul 2013 |
|
|
|
Oct 9 2014, 05:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
177 posts Joined: Jul 2013 |
|
|
|
Oct 10 2014, 09:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
177 posts Joined: Jul 2013 |
Procurement budget figures 2015, army 951 million, increased from RM 905m last year, Navy 1.2b up from 462m, RMAF 820m down from RM998m - dzirhan tweet
|
|
|
Oct 10 2014, 10:17 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
177 posts Joined: Jul 2013 |
|
|
|
Oct 11 2014, 09:00 AM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
177 posts Joined: Jul 2013 |
French ditch MESMA AIP? Nasib baik kita tak beli.
|
|
|
Oct 14 2014, 09:28 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
177 posts Joined: Jul 2013 |
QUOTE(ikmal2129 @ Oct 14 2014, 05:29 PM) I'm ok with Exo block 3. With current ceiling price, i dunno what SAM can meet the budget.My prediction, still exo and mica. But NSM and CAMM really fit with the SGPV modern design. :dreaming: |
|
|
Oct 20 2014, 11:56 AM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
177 posts Joined: Jul 2013 |
|
|
|
Oct 21 2014, 01:15 PM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
177 posts Joined: Jul 2013 |
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Oct 21 2014, 01:02 PM) Should've factored it all during design phase. Lack of amphibious ability in some variants still seems like a major handicap for the AV8 to me. like ship, to maintain the buoyancy while able to support heavy equipment and armour, you need a bigger chassis/displacement. Later not meet army requirement because can't fit aircraft. All AV8 hulls are by default amphibious AFAIK, but some variants can cause the ability to be removed? sounds funny. than another Joe will complain why so big ah? |
|
|
Oct 21 2014, 01:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
177 posts Joined: Jul 2013 |
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Oct 21 2014, 10:34 AM) Another reason for my suggestion for ATM to get one or two variant of the AV8 (the APC version and the 25mm Bushmaster IFV version), maximize its potential on that version and stick with it. Designing 12 other turrets for 12 other uses for the AV8 and trying to make it into a jack-of-all trades is wasteful, redundant and probably will lead to many blind alleys. what to do? since it's a big project, we need to do in the house. I think there a policy about local involvement if the project exceed some amount. I think it's a good and bad policy.I think this ambitious AV8 project is not quite right for Malaysia at this time,maybe in future,but not right now. ![]() 12 variants? c'mon! This post has been edited by pcboss00: Oct 21 2014, 01:24 PM |
|
|
Oct 24 2014, 11:19 AM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
177 posts Joined: Jul 2013 |
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Oct 24 2014, 11:07 AM) On the subject of APCs and IFVs, I wonder why is it that Malaysian Army bought armored vehicles that no other country uses? i don think it's so complicated in our procurement in back days. meet the requirement and price, they sign the contract.Like the German Condor and Belgian SIBMAS, no other country, not even their mother countries are using them. And Malaysia bought these in relatively huge numbers, 180 for the SIBMAS and 450 for the Condor. If long and detail feasible study were taken, the 'lagendary' skyhawk will not exist in our AF. |
|
|
Oct 30 2014, 10:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
177 posts Joined: Jul 2013 |
QUOTE(lucifer_666 @ Oct 29 2014, 09:28 PM) personally, i still think that this is an idea worth pursuing (manned airship or tethered blimp) for maritime surveillance in Straits of Malacca & Sabah East Coast Lol. Look like we will join them. http://finance.yahoo.com/news/tcom-bintang...-150100036.html |
| Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic |
| Change to: | 0.0658sec
0.30
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 01:40 AM |