Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Military Thread V13

views
     
pcboss00
post Sep 4 2014, 02:35 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
177 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
pump boat tu apee?
pcboss00
post Sep 4 2014, 02:39 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
177 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
QUOTE(KYPMbangi @ Sep 4 2014, 02:25 PM)
Map shows what each country's military camouflage pattern looks like
[Click for full size image]

Msia camo is not there.. huhu..  cry.gif
*
link rosak abam
pcboss00
post Sep 4 2014, 02:41 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
177 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
QUOTE(kinabalu @ Sep 4 2014, 02:39 PM)
sampan with engine.
*
thanks blush.gif
pcboss00
post Sep 4 2014, 03:18 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
177 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
QUOTE(KYPMbangi @ Sep 4 2014, 03:11 PM)
18 RAMD DI BUMI SABAH

LATIHAN OP GASAK II [FORMASI SIANG & MALAM]
[18 RAMD]
*
I like this. Pilak impression like< "Army, army everywhere.jpg".
pcboss00
post Sep 5 2014, 05:28 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
177 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
^^ wtf link got flyingspeghettimonster laugh.gif
pcboss00
post Sep 8 2014, 10:01 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
177 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
user posted image
Zhejiang province
pcboss00
post Sep 8 2014, 10:13 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
177 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
The picture from last year. It's a mock model to be display in National Defense educational Base.
pcboss00
post Sep 17 2014, 05:16 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
177 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Sep 17 2014, 11:07 AM)
Secret discussions revealed: US asks Malaysia for Maritime Reconnaissance base in Sabah

user posted image
A Boeing P-8 Poseidon Maritime Reconnaissance Aircraft

According to a senior diplomat familiar with the talks, the US have been discussing with Malaysian government officials for 'some time' on the possibility of a basing agreement in the Malaysian state of Sabah for US P-8 Poseidon maritime reconnaissance planes to monitor the South China Sea.

The statement seems to have been confirmed by the US Chief of Naval Operations, Admiral Jonathan W. Greenert when he spoke at a forum in Washington last week. He was quoted as "the recent offer by Malaysia for P-8 Poseidon aircraft to fly out of the country’s most eastern area would give the United States greater proximity to the South China Sea".

Malaysian Defense minister Tun Hishamuddin Hussein,when asked by local press about an agreement for a Malaysian-US deal on 'US fighters' to operate out of Sabah, the minister replied: "that is not true".

(Although as P-8 Poseidons are not "fighter" planes.... so technically the MENHAN did not lie....biggrin.gif )

News Link:Malaysia to base US Navy Poseidons?
*
what the big deal? RAAF P-3 operate in "penang"~singapore long time already.
pcboss00
post Sep 25 2014, 11:57 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
177 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
QUOTE(zimhibikie @ Sep 25 2014, 11:02 AM)
bigger than destroyer, yet armament still coastal patrol vessel level pun..
*
winnable if ram small puny ship tongue.gif
pcboss00
post Oct 9 2014, 05:35 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
177 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
QUOTE(ichi_24 @ Oct 9 2014, 05:32 PM)
LTZ is our very own submariner and these pic probably have flag for public purpose
*
lel that not ours tongue.gif
pcboss00
post Oct 9 2014, 05:42 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
177 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
QUOTE(ichi_24 @ Oct 9 2014, 05:38 PM)
check back the picture

saw "PERU"

german subs! drool.gif
*
from the sail, probably from german "type" family.

edit,
Islay class. Type 209/1100.

This post has been edited by pcboss00: Oct 9 2014, 05:44 PM
pcboss00
post Oct 10 2014, 09:00 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
177 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
Procurement budget figures 2015, army 951 million, increased from RM 905m last year, Navy 1.2b up from 462m, RMAF 820m down from RM998m - dzirhan tweet
pcboss00
post Oct 10 2014, 10:17 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
177 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
QUOTE(junchuan @ Oct 10 2014, 09:42 PM)
Why dun najib grow sum balls and station 6 hawks in layang, first combat aircrafts based in spratly islands biggrin.gif
But probably a bad idea cuz dk wat china will do tongue.gif
*
Shelter tak ada. Logistic nightmare summore.
pcboss00
post Oct 11 2014, 09:00 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
177 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
French ditch MESMA AIP? Nasib baik kita tak beli.
pcboss00
post Oct 14 2014, 09:28 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
177 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
QUOTE(ikmal2129 @ Oct 14 2014, 05:29 PM)
http://www.malaysiandefence.com/?p=4987

Any chance SGPV getting other combo instead of Exo+Mica?  hmm.gif
*
I'm ok with Exo block 3. With current ceiling price, i dunno what SAM can meet the budget.
My prediction, still exo and mica.

But NSM and CAMM really fit with the SGPV modern design. :dreaming:
pcboss00
post Oct 20 2014, 11:56 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
177 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
QUOTE(atreyuangel @ Oct 17 2014, 11:21 PM)
in 60 ke 70s aku dah lupa
ada kes subs submerge sebelah oil rig!
hang tau?
*
yg ni urban legend katanya. sub russia, otw ke selat melaka.
pcboss00
post Oct 21 2014, 01:15 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
177 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Oct 21 2014, 01:02 PM)
Should've factored it all during design phase. Lack of amphibious ability in some variants still seems like a major handicap for the AV8 to me. 
All AV8 hulls are by default amphibious AFAIK, but some variants can cause the ability to be removed? sounds funny.
*
like ship, to maintain the buoyancy while able to support heavy equipment and armour, you need a bigger chassis/displacement. Later not meet army requirement because can't fit aircraft. tongue.gif
than another Joe will complain why so big ah?

pcboss00
post Oct 21 2014, 01:22 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
177 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Oct 21 2014, 10:34 AM)
Another reason for my suggestion for ATM to get one or two variant of the AV8 (the APC version and the 25mm Bushmaster IFV version), maximize its potential on that version and stick with it. Designing 12 other turrets for 12 other uses for the AV8 and trying to make it into a jack-of-all trades is wasteful, redundant and probably will lead to many blind alleys.

I think this ambitious AV8 project is not quite right for Malaysia at this time,maybe in future,but not right now.

user posted image
12 variants? c'mon!
*
what to do? since it's a big project, we need to do in the house. I think there a policy about local involvement if the project exceed some amount. I think it's a good and bad policy.

This post has been edited by pcboss00: Oct 21 2014, 01:24 PM
pcboss00
post Oct 24 2014, 11:19 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
177 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Oct 24 2014, 11:07 AM)
On the subject of APCs and IFVs, I wonder why is it that Malaysian Army bought armored vehicles that no other country uses?
Like the German Condor and Belgian SIBMAS, no other country, not even their mother countries are using them.

And Malaysia bought these in relatively huge numbers, 180 for the SIBMAS and 450 for the Condor.
*
i don think it's so complicated in our procurement in back days. meet the requirement and price, they sign the contract.
If long and detail feasible study were taken, the 'lagendary' skyhawk will not exist in our AF.
pcboss00
post Oct 30 2014, 10:56 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
177 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
QUOTE(lucifer_666 @ Oct 29 2014, 09:28 PM)
personally, i still think that this is an idea worth pursuing (manned airship or tethered blimp) for maritime surveillance in Straits of Malacca & Sabah East Coast  hmm.gif
*
Lol. Look like we will join them. http://finance.yahoo.com/news/tcom-bintang...-150100036.html

2 Pages  1 2 >
Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0658sec    0.30    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 01:40 AM