Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Military Thread V13

views
     
lucifer_666
post Sep 4 2014, 06:13 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
234 posts

Joined: Oct 2008


QUOTE(KYPMbangi @ Sep 4 2014, 02:42 PM)
Fixed

user posted image

[Link]
*
multicam (and its derivatives Scorpion W2/MTP seems popular). hmm.gif but i fancy cadpat. any idea where to get one? biggrin.gif
lucifer_666
post Sep 4 2014, 06:45 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
234 posts

Joined: Oct 2008


QUOTE(LTZ @ Sep 4 2014, 06:43 PM)
Bergelap tonight..... now in crisis time.
*
well, keep safe then. praying for the safety of for all personnel and civilian in areas involved (if any).
lucifer_666
post Oct 8 2014, 10:55 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
234 posts

Joined: Oct 2008


QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Oct 8 2014, 02:40 PM)
user posted image
China constructing Zubr heavy hovercraft. The red banner hung on the stern says 'Reuniting the motherland'.

Whoa nelly shocking.gif
*
Look at banner. Look at Taiwan... rolleyes.gif
lucifer_666
post Oct 29 2014, 09:28 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
234 posts

Joined: Oct 2008


QUOTE
Above and beyond: New surveillance system to guard against aerial, maritime threats
user posted image
SINGAPORE: The Republic will soon have an extra pair of eyes in the sky to look out for aerial and maritime threats. The Aerostat System – a tethered balloon that uses low-level radar to detect threats as far as 200km away – will be deployed early next year.

Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen announced this on Tuesday (Oct 28) at Nanyang Polytechnic, during the PRoductivity and Innovation in Daily Efforts (PRIDE) Day award ceremony. The event promotes innovation and productivity across the Ministry of Defence.

Dr Ng said with the Aerostat System, the Singapore Armed Forces will save nearly S$30 million in operating costs a year.

The system will complement the Republic of Singapore Air Force's current suite of airborne and ground-based radars. "Our ground-based radar systems can only operate above high-rise buildings," Dr Ng said, adding that the urban landscape in Singapore is changing, and more tall buildings are coming up.

"For a small island-state like Singapore, surveillance and early warning to give us sufficient reaction time to respond will always be a challenge but the Aerostat will improve our surveillance capabilities significantly," he said.

The system requires eight ground crew members to operate. The Aerostat can be tethered to a height of up to 600 metres – about twice the height of One Raffles Place building. Safety measures will also be in place to ensure Aerostat is far from flying aircraft, when deployed. The blimp will also be secured to the ground mooring station with a Kevlar tether, to withstand strong winds and lightning strikes.

Aerostats have been used by different agencies across the world since the 1980s as early warning systems and for radio re-broadcast.

In a Facebook post on Tuesday, Dr Ng said the "protector in the sky" will strengthen Singapore's defences against aerial and maritime threats.

"The aerostat will complement our ground radars to detect such threats and provide early warning. It can stay airborne for 24/7, use less manpower and cost less," wrote Dr Ng.

He also applauded Singapore's military planners and engineers who are "constantly coming up with new and better ideas for our nation's defence."


personally, i still think that this is an idea worth pursuing (manned airship or tethered blimp) for maritime surveillance in Straits of Malacca & Sabah East Coast hmm.gif
lucifer_666
post Oct 30 2014, 02:20 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
234 posts

Joined: Oct 2008


QUOTE(General Fahmy @ Oct 30 2014, 02:09 PM)
You look at the coordination of our radar people take so long to reveal, after the MH370 made turn back.

Don't think it make a ton of difference so as long as the mentality of our people don't change.
*
well, maybe they have their own procedures and regulations to adhere to. i dont know the details, so i wont comment further upon that. but yes, there seems to be a lapse them, between the ATC, civilian and military radar operators.

just stating the personal opinion that i think its nice to have a constant & continuous, high altitude (therefore long range) surveillance platform.

whether its a more cost-effective option than what we already have, further research may be necessary.

Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0180sec    0.36    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 09:19 AM