QUOTE(wankongyew @ Dec 6 2014, 11:20 AM)
You know, virtually every fund in FSM that invests internationally underperforms its stated benchmark, sometimes by a very large margin. Feeder funds generally underperform more. It's kind of annoying to me. I think it's mostly due to the fees involved. I chose FSM because, well, it's very convenient. But I wonder if for the sums I have available, it wouldn't make more sense for me to open an account with a large US-based fund company and buy their ETFs instead.
Err...not really. There are some good foreign funds.
Eastspring Investments Global Emerging Markets outperformed MSCI EM index, or at least managed to track quite closely
CIMB Global Titans outperformed MSCI World index
TA European Equity managed to track European indices too
And CIMB Asia Pacific Dynamic Income (our acclaimed Ponzi 2.0

) totally thrashed MSCI Asia ex Japan index...
Gems are out there, u just gotta do some homework (and need some luck)
E.g. TA BRIC and Emerging Markets were terrible vs MSCI EM index over 3- and 5-year periods
Okay, u are right on one - US fund
RHB-OSK-GS US Equity couldn't even track S&P 500 index
I think this is agreed by most US equity analysts - managed funds lose to ETFs where it comes to US equity market
This post has been edited by Pink Spider: Dec 6 2014, 06:14 PM