Interesting article for Intel, Concerning chipset strap
|
|
 Aug 24 2006, 06:11 AM, updated 20y ago
Show posts by this member only | Post
#1
|
 
VIP
3,773 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Anywhere lah...as long got Kopi-O   
|
Courtesy of Tony OCZ which helps a lot in terms of understanding how the chipsets work at OC'ed speeds and how to best work on it
The discussion: http://xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=106834 The article: http://www.bleedinedge.com/forum/showthread.php?t=22297 Note the article is to be updated as Tony makes further progress sifting thru the white papers This post has been edited by almostthere: Aug 24 2006, 06:16 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 9 2006, 12:36 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#2
|
 
Senior Member
1,966 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: No longer hanging by a NUS 
|
Tony unlocks the reason why lower-end C2Ds can o/c more than the higher-end ones (and NO, it's not because of the cache).
C2D o/c secrets |
|
|
Sep 9 2006, 01:10 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#3
|
|
VIP
3,773 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Anywhere lah...as long got Kopi-O
|
QUOTE(cks2k2 @ Sep 9 2006, 12:36 AM) Tony unlocks the reason why lower-end C2Ds can o/c more than the higher-end ones (and NO, it's not because of the cache). hehheeee...finally someone who did bother to read about it. But it follows the basic rule of FSB OC'ing. Lower multi's is the classic methodC2D o/c secrets  |
|
|
Sep 9 2006, 01:38 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#4
|
Senior Member
1,885 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Sydney / Penang
|
very informative article, i've been wondering all these for quite some time
|
|
|
Sep 9 2006, 09:17 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#5
|
|
Senior Member
1,966 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: No longer hanging by a NUS
|
QUOTE(almostthere @ Sep 9 2006, 01:10 AM) hehheeee...finally someone who did bother to read about it. But it follows the basic rule of FSB OC'ing. Lower multi's is the classic method Only up to a point: if the ratio btw std multiplier and set multiplier is too much x FSB the strain on the NB will limit the o/c. |
|
|
Sep 9 2006, 06:20 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#6
|
|
VIP
3,773 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Anywhere lah...as long got Kopi-O
|
QUOTE(cks2k2 @ Sep 9 2006, 09:17 AM) Only up to a point: if the ratio btw std multiplier and set multiplier is too much x FSB the strain on the NB will limit the o/c. Which is where the article helps in understanding it's effects and the strap issues. |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 9 2006, 06:41 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#7
|
 
Moderator
9,275 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: KL. Best place in Malaysia. Nuff said
|
good god, I suddenly saw the light!!!
great article BTW |
|
|
Sep 10 2006, 12:03 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#8
|
Senior Member
905 posts Joined: Aug 2006
|
wow..good article...thanks for sharing
|
|
|
Oct 28 2006, 02:01 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#9
|
Senior Member
2,865 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
Bump up for a good information thread...
 |
|
|
 Nov 4 2006, 07:08 PM
|
Senior Member
4,139 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Internet
|
QUOTE(cks2k2 @ Sep 9 2006, 01:36 AM) Tony unlocks the reason why lower-end C2Ds can o/c more than the higher-end ones (and NO, it's not because of the cache). damn... they actually got time to go through the white papers... wonder wat they do for their living... but tat's a good info... C2D o/c secrets  |
|
|
Nov 7 2006, 07:58 AM
|
Senior Member
616 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Milky Way / UK / Ipoh
|
They are probably engineers I guess... Geez, after reading the article, I'm abit more worried for my NB than my CPU cause can never really tell the actual temperature on the NB, scared that it's stressing more than the CPU...
|
|
|
Nov 7 2006, 01:01 PM
|
|
Senior Member
5,341 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
Does anyone here test on the strap on 267,333 and 400 ? Does the memory performance drops significant at those chipset clock speed?Asus P5B i965
|
|
|
Nov 13 2006, 01:58 PM
|
|
Senior Member
4,139 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Internet
|
QUOTE(MaGicDust @ Nov 7 2006, 08:58 AM) They are probably engineers I guess... Geez, after reading the article, I'm abit more worried for my NB than my CPU cause can never really tell the actual temperature on the NB, scared that it's stressing more than the CPU... try using thermometer... real 1ce... then tell us if it's affective...  |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 13 2006, 09:30 PM
|
All Stars
14,908 posts Joined: Jul 2005 
|
So, this mean that E6300 is much much better then the X6800 am i right?
 |
|
|
Nov 13 2006, 10:32 PM
|
|
Senior Member
2,865 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(sHawTY @ Nov 13 2006, 09:30 PM) So, this mean that E6300 is much much better then the X6800 am i right? Ya ya..go buy E6300 and OC to X6800...I dunno from which info/site/review/data sheet/ that lead U make to this statement...  2mb vs 4mb, unlock multiplier vs locked multiplier.....and etc... Go figure.  This post has been edited by mikelanding: Nov 13 2006, 11:08 PM |
|
|
Nov 14 2006, 12:26 AM
|
Senior Member
3,291 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Nowhere Everywhere
|
So the real question should be.. Does E6600 overclocks alot better then x6800?
Hurm.. very interesting article though... Gotta do some reading later. |
|
|
Nov 19 2006, 09:43 PM
|
|
Senior Member
2,865 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
The link of article seem to be broken. Here the update 1: http://www.bleedinedgesupport.com/ocz/foru...ead.php?t=22297
Hope thread starter amend accordingly... This post has been edited by mikelanding: Nov 19 2006, 09:43 PM |
|
|
Dec 16 2006, 04:26 PM
|
Junior Member
87 posts Joined: Feb 2005 From: penang,
|
nice link you got there.. might as well grab a c2D and try ocing it..
|
|
|
 Dec 17 2006, 11:32 AM
|
|
Senior Member
4,139 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Internet
|
i heard tat current 6300 are conroes and have 4 MB cache physically but locked... any1 know how to unlock it...?
 |
| Change to: |  0.0172sec
 0.60
 5 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 29th November 2025 - 06:03 PM |
Quote