No. I leave it all the time inside. Reason? No time if I want to quickly take a candid shot of my 18 month old.

Hi guys,
Am in a little dilemma.

I used to shoot events for my Organisation many eons ago. Back then I was using a Pentax K7 and a variety of lenses. And after my baby came along, I traded that in for a F3 as i wanted something smaller to tote around and I retired from shooting my company's events.

Recently, they beg me to take up the job again... At this weekend, there is an annual dinner with some performances. Now, I still have some good ol' Pentax aperture driven lenses and I intend to use them... Which will also allow me to snip away. Unfortunately, they aren't long enough. max is 100mm.

So my problem is, and note that $$$ is an issue here, would my trusty ol' F3 be up to the task? Should I upgrade that to 6000? or should I get the 55-210 to allow me to get that extra reach?

Now, I have always managed to survive camera limitations ... And getting the best out of the situations Coming from Pentax. So...

What do you guys think?

Thanks.

nutz,
Personally,I would have preferred if the 2nd and 4th photo had more space... Meaning that your model wasn't really in the center... More towards the edge,thereby giving her that more wistfu look/gaze...

Otherwise, I like them.

This post has been edited by ultrageek: Sep 26 2014, 10:30 PM