Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V60, From A to E mount!
Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V60, From A to E mount!
|
|
Aug 19 2014, 04:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,286 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: Home |
Does anyone here own the RX100 M3? Seems like theres good reviews all over. MIGHT consider moving to that since I find my A77 abit too bulky. But I know that I'll definitely miss my A77.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 20 2014, 12:11 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,286 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: Home |
QUOTE(Slevin Sent @ Aug 19 2014, 04:59 PM) i got a RX100 MK2, while the image quality cant match my NEX. Its so small that i can bring it to everywhere. Literally everywhere. Exactly. It's so portable. That attracts me. Mind posting some sample shots taken from your RX100? Have you tried the Mark3? Is the new lens any better?But will not sell the NEX thou.. Love It! |
|
|
Aug 20 2014, 12:12 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,286 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: Home |
|
|
|
Aug 20 2014, 01:38 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,286 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: Home |
QUOTE(Slevin Sent @ Aug 20 2014, 12:33 AM) u can check it out here.. some great photo by forumers Thanks! Never knew an RX100 thread existed.---> https://forum.lowyat.net/topic/2377899 <--- |
|
|
Aug 22 2014, 11:18 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,286 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: Home |
QUOTE(awiekupo @ Aug 22 2014, 10:36 AM) Sry, confuse a bit.. this announcement means there will be new lens for A6000 or A7 series? Sounds like it. New E mount lenses. Does the A6000 and A7 use E mount? I don't know. Haven't been following the latest for awhile. http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/sr5-huge-ze...s-will-love-it/ |
|
|
Aug 22 2014, 06:38 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,286 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: Home |
I went into Sony Centre today to try the RX100 M3 as well as the A6000. Oh God why did I even walk in in the first place..
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 10 2014, 12:17 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,286 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: Home |
QUOTE(HaN18 @ Sep 10 2014, 11:45 AM) so what brand of UV filter is good enough to reduce all the cons you mention above? because im a rough person too You gotta be ready to take out money for good filters. They go up to a few hundred ringgit. Zeiss, B+W, Hoya Pro1BTW im using HOYA filter now so far so good. I about to buy sel1018 soon.. so need find a good filter for this wide angle lens |
|
|
Sep 10 2014, 09:07 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,286 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: Home |
QUOTE(poi2005 @ Sep 10 2014, 07:07 PM) Hi anyone with A6000 battery drain while the camera is off? Could be normal. Was it in an aircond room? Or maybe your battery is not calibrated well.I turn on the camera today with 1% left where yesterday night still have 15% before I turn off. Airplane mode is 'ON', no wifi , nfc etc. Remote control is turn off as well. Any idea why it drains so much battery? Thanks . |
|
|
Sep 11 2014, 02:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,286 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: Home |
QUOTE(bai1101 @ Sep 11 2014, 10:04 AM) You don't need a tripod for moon. Just use aperture priority, set your lens to F8, ISO400. Choose spot metering and set the moon right in the centre of the frame. The shutter speed will most probably be around 1/200. Don't bother framing the moon since you're most probably gonna be cropping the picture anyways. |
|
|
Sep 11 2014, 02:04 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,286 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: Home |
QUOTE(melvintcs @ Sep 11 2014, 01:06 PM) im planning to get a external flashlite for my A6000, F20M at Rm499. Metz to me is the best and most reliable 3rd party flash. They're ADI/TTL is just as accurate as Sony's. YongNuo/Nissin/Octopus/Sunpak/etc I don't wanna comment.the price is fine for me, but i seldom use, so if possible, i want something more cheaper. how about this model? Metz 24? Selling at Rm299, and it has TTL feature. http://www.lelong.com.my/metz-24-af-1-meca...7-01-Sale-I.htm i just worried that 3rd party TTL is not accurate. later ended up using manual |
|
|
Sep 11 2014, 06:14 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,286 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: Home |
QUOTE(melvintcs @ Sep 11 2014, 02:20 PM) thank you for the reply, do i need to use adapter for the hotshoe between Metz 24 + Sony A6000? Im not really sure about the hotshoe, but if I were to guess, it'll be the old Sony hotshoe. Believe me or not, I actually prefer the old hotshoe over the new ISO hotshoe. One reason only. Because the old one 'clicks' in, unlike the ISO which you have to turn turn turn for it to lock. Not sure if you understand what Im trying to say or not. i can't find the answer at google but this does come close: http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/53707347 if it needs an adapter, i think i just get the F20M, end of story. QUOTE(Eiraku @ Sep 11 2014, 05:21 PM) Trying out some noobie B&W with the Tokky 3.5/17. Shot wide open so please forgive the haziness. Straight from the A6k with basic PP on my phone. Your picture looks out of focus. Was it done on purpose?![]() Somehow this pic just makes me want the Rokkie 2/12 even more now... Not... enough... bokeh... Yeah, I actually want bokeh for my UWAs... I'm prolly just crazy like that. QUOTE(edpaul @ Sep 11 2014, 05:57 PM) im 2nd to newbieeeeeee, And if you find a good deal online, you can get the F43 cheap. I got mine, mint condition no scratches no nothing, white bulb, full set, under warranty for a few more months for RM400/450. Cant really remember. Metz is know to be closest to accurate in TTL for canikony... with proper i/e-ttl/ADI. others are just plain hit and miss ttl. till today, nissin and YN that i tested recently (nissin 4th gen? ttl, YN 2nd gen ttl, both for canon) still hit and miss. after a little google up and homepage searching.... both brand(metz/nissin) doesnt provide proper information of hotshoe although both claim support Sony ADI/ttl, nor the photo are conclusive showing the new sony Multimedia Interface (MI) iso hotshoe... just plain iso hotshoe which mean, no concrete evidence of Mi hotshoe interface... so the only way is to head down to a shop who carries them to take proper 'LOOK' at the hotshoe before buying online(RISK). (if anyone actually seen those flash with sony MI hotshoe, please let us know) my own 2 cent, i wont bother the metz24 or nissini40, that rm500 spend, rather save it more for a proper F43M(rm7xx). why? if you just need a light fill, the pop up(finger move it to bounce) is more then enough under iso1600~ worried bout ugly direct flash light? please use 'SlowSync Flash' mode. you will be surprise how the Slowsync Flash does wonders!. and when saved for a F43m, it can be better in many ways from "house gathering" to 'event' shooting with the faster cycle then Metz/Nissin. |
|
|
Sep 13 2014, 08:09 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,286 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: Home |
|
|
|
Sep 14 2014, 12:48 AM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,286 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: Home |
QUOTE(weretiger @ Sep 14 2014, 12:37 AM) ![]() E 50mm F1.8 OSS ƒ/1.8 50.0 mm 1/4000 ISO 1000 the tough and untouchable real god car... see this and you should drive your car away..... it bang you you lose... XD |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 14 2014, 06:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,286 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: Home |
|
|
|
Sep 19 2014, 03:26 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,286 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: Home |
QUOTE(Valentino46 @ Sep 19 2014, 02:26 PM) let me give a few examples of a6000 erratic exposure and face recognition I don't think this is a fair comparison, due to back lighting. How about you try to pop your flash up and let the camera detect the face?![]() this is when camera can't find the face,perfect exposure,but no soft skin ![]() once the camera detect faces,camera apply soft skin,but exposure hancur ![]() camera can't find faces again,perfect exposure again,but no soft skin ![]() found face,crap exposure ![]() no face found,ok ![]() no face found ![]() face found ![]() no face found ![]() face found that said,when everything bang on,the detail is just STUNNING |
|
|
Sep 20 2014, 01:22 AM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,286 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: Home |
QUOTE(Valentino46 @ Sep 19 2014, 10:53 PM) thanks for your reply, You only have one shutter. It either meters the background or the face. You choose. You can't have 1/1250 for the background and 1/800 for the face so that they're both perfectly exposed right? And if those pictures are not due to backlighting then I don't know what else it is. This is when flashes come into play. Meter the background and flash the face. Let the ADI kick in. Simple solution. No camera in the world can perfectly expose both the face and the background.1) to illustrate this problem,try lock on focus (its a feature,i use it for "quick focus then recompose" technique) with sony at a moderate busy place,then try on olympus or panasonic,you'll know what i mean 2) my problem is not dealing with backlighting, my beef with this camera is it force u to use spot metering if face detect,that's what my main problem,let me re-iterate ![]() perfect exposure ![]() blown exposure once the camera detect the face,not because it backlighted,because it spot metered the face perfect shot is not what i after,i can lift the shadow area with slight post editing,what i want the face detection to do is just so that i can focus off center faces easily,natural face expression doesn't wait you to manual focus or manually move focus point but just now i try AEL before focusing,it partially solve the problems This post has been edited by Newbieeeeee: Sep 20 2014, 01:23 AM |
|
|
Sep 20 2014, 01:27 AM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,286 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: Home |
|
|
|
Sep 20 2014, 02:38 AM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,286 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: Home |
QUOTE(yok70 @ Sep 20 2014, 02:02 AM) ya, some people here has very strange response when someone complain about some functionality offered by a camera. me and you becomes victim for a while now. :P How is that face detection thing a 'weakness'? It doesn't make any sense. It's supposed to detect a face. That's all it's supposed to do! Do you expect the camera to frame your shot for you as well? Or help you do some instant editing in Photoshop? Or do you expect 2 different shutter speeds, one for the background and one for the face? Calling the face detection a weakness because it can't get perfect exposure for a backlit photo, which no camera in this world is able to do, shows us your level of knowledge about cameras and their system.we are here to discuss how "the" camera behave on certain functions/features, and how to work around them or providing suggestions to the camera maker for a firmware update etc. This is suppose to be a constructive discussions but then we see many emotional responses (even for the one sentence I wrote!) that seems like they are not happy on any complain. You had shown us the weakness of this face detection feature, so it's a weakness, this is the fact. So I think you deserved to be thank by sharing this. Of course we can choose other way to shoot the photo better, but that's out of the point here. We are discussing about face detection, remember? Not like, oh, you shouldn't use it this way, bla bla bla. ok, forget about those noise now. So in conclusion, I do wish Sony gives us an option to set on/off for face detection on Exposure. If we have this option, that would be really nice to use the face detection feature since without it, the auto exposure works really well actually. And in fact, it's a great feature to have when shooting events. For now, I'd chose to use manual mode with Auto ISO and DMF for AF mode and turn off the face detection. When flash is on, a slow-sync gives more comfortable exposure but I usually prefer to not use the flash unless it's absolutely necessary or it's in a carefully set up studio. B] This post has been edited by Newbieeeeee: Sep 20 2014, 02:41 AM |
|
|
Sep 20 2014, 03:02 AM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,286 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: Home |
QUOTE(yok70 @ Sep 20 2014, 02:46 AM) What are you talking about?? Read carefully what people said before shooting back. Don't act like a child. How old are you? Kid? Oh yes I'm glad you got it right. I am indeed a kid. Why am I not allowed to act like one? If you're not a kid then why aren't you acting like one? Well at least a kid doesn't need to insult a so called 'adult' to prove his point. I said, turning off face detection, the auto exposure works very well even at moderate backlit condition (as demonstrated by Valentino46). Therefore, if the face detection can give us an option to use the auto exposure mode that works when there is no face detection, then it would be great. Meaning, the face detection only find the face and focus it for us, that's all. Don't you want this feature? Please tell me, do you want this feature? No? You don't want is it? You prefer it the way right now is it? An option to turn off exposure meter on face is just required firmware update, no need hardware update. And it should be a rather simple update. :hmm: Kid 1-0 Self proclaimed adult. Edit: Btw I didn't really read through what you said. Haven't been following Sony's technology for quite some time now so I have no idea what you're talking about. In conclusion, tl;dr. This post has been edited by Newbieeeeee: Sep 20 2014, 03:04 AM |
|
|
Sep 20 2014, 10:55 AM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,286 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: Home |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0783sec
0.36
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 20th December 2025 - 05:05 AM |