QUOTE(skulless @ Jul 4 2007, 12:31 PM)
The robots didn't have enough on screen time or personality is because there are so many of them, and it's hard to focus on all of them instead of the story. The story was based on allspark and the consequences of it. OP and Megatron is always the main cast of TF, Bumblebee had more on screen because he was attached to Sam, who is the main cast of the movie. This is a general movie not based on the animations and certainly not a toy figure movie.
Lord of the rings have many actors too, but you can still see personallity. a "general movie" is an excuse. if spider-man were not made with his original custome, will it be succesfull? wonder why spider-man 3 wasn't much of a success? because they screw a few things. wonder why x-men 3 was a failure? because they screw a few things. if it wasn't based on the cartoon/tittle, why the heck was "optimus prime" in it? serious, it's an excuse that has been used by many directors before. no such thing as "general movie".

wonder why when a film that has succesfully adapt from its original title, "general movie" was never mentioned?
QUOTE(skulless @ Jul 4 2007, 12:31 PM)
The CGI was definitely a top drawer, a new software specially written for it at the Industrial of Light and Magic. People who said it's the movie of year because they like not because they haven't seen anything better.
well it's a bit a early to give the "movie of the year" title isn't? IIRC, ghost rider was anticipated as "movie of the year" too. now what happened? they're giving away tittle for free? wonder why ghost rider fails? because they screw a few things and say it's a "general movie".
QUOTE(skulless @ Jul 4 2007, 12:31 PM)
When the 1st designs came out, every TF fans in the world were screaming at M Bay and his design crew, esp Hasbro. Heck, it was awesome when it got integrated with the movie and story. The alternator line is a toy figure collection and if you do collect the movie line collection, you will notice the transformation is so much harder than alternators because it is more realistic.
alternators are more well designed and realistic man. heck it's even in scale. movie line is realistic? please, all i see in the transformation sequence was cheating effects. honestly, it was hasbro that saved the movie. m.bay didn't even want the robots to have dialogue. mr bay would've screwed the movie over if he didn't consult with hasbro. sure the toys looks great, but the movie model is not the same as the toy model is it now?
This post has been edited by zeroglyph: Jul 4 2007, 02:29 PM