Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 fat or lean!?, check it out...

views
     
TST+1
post Aug 12 2006, 05:54 PM, updated 20y ago

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,368 posts

Joined: Jun 2006


simple method to check whether we r fat or lean

(adapted from http://www.accumeasurefitness.com/descript.html)

The site you will use for skinfold measurement is the suprailliac (approximately one inch above the right hipbone).
check the thickness of ur skin (at position as shown in the figure)
Repeat three times and use the average as your measurement. Refer to the body fat interpretation chart to determine your body fat percentage and what it means.
user posted image

user posted image

i dun have the caliper, so i just estimated with fingers only tongue.gif
hehe, i have about 12.7% body fat, which is considered ideal laugh.gif
iDk
post Aug 12 2006, 09:19 PM


******
Senior Member
1,124 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Malaysia
maybe 7.3% BF, roughly see only.
pizzaboy
post Aug 13 2006, 08:43 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
VIP
9,495 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
I think mine about 10.5-11 % lidat...

terperanjat me man, i was lookin at the women's one, then i tot, "WAHLEUH!!!! 18% meh!!??!!!!"
iDk
post Aug 13 2006, 09:11 AM


******
Senior Member
1,124 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Malaysia
haha.. same here. Women need to be really low on BF then only can consider lean if compare to men's BF. It is not easy to become women.
TST+1
post Aug 13 2006, 08:10 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,368 posts

Joined: Jun 2006


eh... i think girls can have higher BF to be considered lean. it is natural that girls store more fat in their bodies.
btw, skinfold measurement for lean/ideal/average/overfat is basically the same for male and female.
TST+1
post Aug 13 2006, 08:17 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,368 posts

Joined: Jun 2006


actually, for those who want to lose weight through exercise, setting ur goal in term of body fat percent is much much better.
this is because when u do exercise, u may build up some muscle mass. however the muscle is much heavier than fat. as a result, u may gain weight although u r losing fat. if u primary goal is to lose weight, this may be discouraging and demotivating.

on contrary, if u set the goal in BF reduction, u will be sure that u come nearer to ur goal...
iDk
post Aug 13 2006, 11:21 PM


******
Senior Member
1,124 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Malaysia
QUOTE(T+1 @ Aug 13 2006, 08:17 PM)
actually, for those who want to lose weight through exercise, setting ur goal in term of body fat percent is much much better.
this is because when u do exercise, u may build up some muscle mass. however the muscle is much heavier than fat. as a result, u may gain weight although u r losing fat. if u primary goal is to lose weight, this may be discouraging and demotivating.

on contrary, if u set the goal in BF reduction, u will be sure that u come nearer to ur goal...
*
are you sure the muscle is heavier than fat? or it is the other way round?

This post has been edited by iDk: Aug 13 2006, 11:21 PM
TST+1
post Aug 14 2006, 01:00 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,368 posts

Joined: Jun 2006


QUOTE(iDk @ Aug 13 2006, 11:21 PM)
are you sure the muscle is heavier than fat? or it is the other way round?
*
definitely sure... because my body size shrank, after weight training although my weight is still the same (assume that i lost fat and gained muscle biggrin.gif )

jut kidding...

QUOTE
Muscle weighs more than fat!
Muscle is 70% water and, as a result, is a relatively heavy tissue-much heavier than fat. On the flip side, fat takes up much more space than muscle, actually three times as much.

pizzaboy
post Aug 14 2006, 02:11 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
VIP
9,495 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
definitely sure that muscle is heavier than fat
muscle takes 4x less space than fat.

so a muscular 200 lbs guy, same height, would actually look, smaller than a 200lbs fat guy.
iDk
post Aug 14 2006, 04:13 PM


******
Senior Member
1,124 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Malaysia
opss.. i tot fat is heavier than muscle biggrin.gif I always got the feeling that fat is heavier than muscle.
LYFfan
post Aug 14 2006, 04:36 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
229 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
QUOTE(iDk @ Aug 14 2006, 04:13 PM)
opss.. i tot fat is heavier than muscle biggrin.gif I always got the feeling that fat is heavier than muscle.
*
Just imagine you're eating some chicken. The lean flesh of the leg is tough. The yellow fatty bits are mushy and soft and squishy.

The weightiness of muscle is in the density of muscle tissue.
db07mufan
post Aug 14 2006, 04:52 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,705 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
wahhh

i so fat!

18%
iDk
post Aug 14 2006, 10:37 PM


******
Senior Member
1,124 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Malaysia
QUOTE(LYFfan @ Aug 14 2006, 04:36 PM)
Just imagine you're eating some chicken. The lean flesh of the leg is tough. The yellow fatty bits are mushy and soft and squishy.

The weightiness of muscle is in the density of muscle tissue.
*
but is there anyway to know how dense is your muscle? Or is there a way to calculate or measure it?
PowerHouse
post Aug 15 2006, 04:02 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
237 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
From: Kuching...


muscle is heavier than fat...
PowerHouse
post Aug 15 2006, 02:26 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
237 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
From: Kuching...


QUOTE(iDk @ Aug 14 2006, 10:37 PM)
but is there anyway to know how dense is your muscle? Or is there a way to calculate or measure it?
*
just measure using the measuring tape. around... lol

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0161sec    1.28    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 19th December 2025 - 03:09 PM