imho, cps is variable valve lift on intake port, low profile to high profile using trilobe cam to enhance the power from mid to high range n for low to mid,since no variable valve timing being used,it being replace by vim-variable intake manifold(like iafm)which is ecu activated,as the name suggest on intake cuz vvt plus vvl is not quite cost efficient for prtn.  even vim n vvt has nearly same objective,to generate more torque at low rpm,but vim only control the air,but vvt cntrol the valve opening n duration n more efficient.

nfe, vvt,without vvl n turbo.

cfe, vvt with single scroll turbo. why use vvt,more cost efficient than twin charger n twin scroll turbo.

vvt n vim are more emmision friendly than vvl. it doesnt mean it cant be done,but hard, time cnsuming n cost related.

nfe is of course the most fuel efficient campro among campro variants n bosch also lending a helping hand,but of course,it is not the most fuel efficient engine out there,just among the campros :-).

but interm of technological advancement, i think it will be better than suprima,inside n out(proton to proton comparison,not other makes)

gcc will be a shy n humble car compare competitors,maybe a dark horse if every thing goes well. if not,then it just a proton n i believe that the rnd team work really hard against the limitation. maybe some suprises during the launch :-).

maybe their honda civic is the usa facelift version? u know the higher class interior which ours kena kutuk kau kau for being plasticky

this is easy to debunk...

it's because Potong factory under-capacity nothing much to produce (low demand), so got time to produce parts for other car makers...

alang2, sewa rent out all factory to Hyundai, Kia etc. lah...don't waste good steels...

currently doing internship at the company that doing the wire harness for this GSC car, still on sampling phase tho.. nothing more i can say..lol