QUOTE(bloods33k3r @ Jun 6 2014, 09:01 AM)
Nikon picture sharper is not bcos of the camera body but is bcos of their Nano lens. This is wat i heard from other photographer.
This is really some long perpetuated misconception. Are you into cameras to learn photography or are you into camera to collect the sharpest lenses in existence? All brands have lenses that are sharp and lenses that are not so sharp. One usually buy lenses based on their usage and need for it. If the lens is sharp enough then it's all good. Just how many people will zoom in a picture and study each individual pixel? The story that a picture tells is much more important than the sharpness.
QUOTE(bloods33k3r @ Jun 6 2014, 09:04 AM)
I understand, but mirrorless camera sensor is much more smaller compare to DSLR, the size of the photo that we can print is limited. Normally mirrorless camera photo just only can print up to 8R sizes. Above 8R, the pixel will noticeable and noises start to appear. But if DSLR photo, we can enlarge and print up to poster sizes, the photo still look sharp as new knife.
The Sony A6000 has an APS-C sized sensor. That is the same sensor size used by all entry level and some mid range DSLRs for both Nikon and Canon. With around 20MP you can safely print normal poster sizes with no problems. The Sony A7 and A7r is compact sized but packs a full frame sensor. That's the same sensor size that's used for the Nikon and Canon flagship cameras. Don't judge a camera by its size.
QUOTE(bloods33k3r @ Jun 6 2014, 09:05 AM)
I do have a Sony camera b4 but the quality is so so only...cant compare with Nikon or Canon. If u said Minolta then yes, but after brought over by Sony n merge, the technology is more improve on electronic component but not lens quality.
Thus far Sony is the only brand to have auto-focus Carl Zeiss lenses. If you are saying that Sony Carl Zeiss lenses are not up to par in terms of quality, then you have a lot to learn about photography in general. No doubt Minolta has some pretty good lenses but I would want to know if there's any photography enthusiast out there who wants to doubt the quality of the following lenses:
1. Sony 135mm f1.8 Zeiss
2. Sony 85mm f1.4 Zeiss
3. Sony 24-70mm f2.8 Zeiss
4. Sony 16-35mm f2.8 Zeiss
5. Sony 50mm f1.4 Zeiss
6. Sony 24mm f2 Zeiss
And I've not even gone into Sony's G series of lenses.
I would suggest that you discard all your pre-conceived notions and disregard all the posts in here too. Including mine. Go out to the shops and test out all the cameras from all brands that's within your budget. Get a feel of how they work and get some pics from them. Then get the one that feels the best to you. Meaning you like the way it works, you like its output and you just don't feel like putting it down. If you find that, then that's the best camera for you.